summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>2013-11-28 00:34:08 +0000
committerBill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>2013-11-28 00:34:08 +0000
commit57907e56191adea0fa870c052054eb0fe0c4681f (patch)
tree55485f18476f42211ffbfa6896a2d3be9705e271
parentc78e5b33cb2dccfd7972eed2bc4a785cfa42bf94 (diff)
downloadclang-57907e56191adea0fa870c052054eb0fe0c4681f.tar.gz
clang-57907e56191adea0fa870c052054eb0fe0c4681f.tar.bz2
clang-57907e56191adea0fa870c052054eb0fe0c4681f.tar.xz
Merging r195827:
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r195827 | majnemer | 2013-11-27 00:20:38 -0800 (Wed, 27 Nov 2013) | 9 lines Sema: Instantiate local class and their members appropriately We would fail to instantiate them when the surrounding function was instantiated. Instantiate the class and add it's members to the list of pending instantiations, they should be resolved when we are finished with the function's body. This fixes PR9685. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_34@195900 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp5
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp8
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp48
-rw-r--r--test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.inst/p1.cpp11
-rw-r--r--test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-local-class.cpp96
5 files changed, 147 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index e9977d42aa..5977b3cbae 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -6270,7 +6270,10 @@ Sema::CheckSpecializationInstantiationRedecl(SourceLocation NewLoc,
switch (NewTSK) {
case TSK_Undeclared:
case TSK_ImplicitInstantiation:
- llvm_unreachable("Don't check implicit instantiations here");
+ assert(
+ (PrevTSK == TSK_Undeclared || PrevTSK == TSK_ImplicitInstantiation) &&
+ "previous declaration must be implicit!");
+ return false;
case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization:
switch (PrevTSK) {
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
index 3c621dafab..7888e27eb5 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
@@ -2457,6 +2457,11 @@ Sema::InstantiateClassMembers(SourceLocation PointOfInstantiation,
CXXRecordDecl *Instantiation,
const MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList &TemplateArgs,
TemplateSpecializationKind TSK) {
+ assert(
+ (TSK == TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition ||
+ TSK == TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration ||
+ (TSK == TSK_ImplicitInstantiation && Instantiation->isLocalClass())) &&
+ "Unexpected template specialization kind!");
for (DeclContext::decl_iterator D = Instantiation->decls_begin(),
DEnd = Instantiation->decls_end();
D != DEnd; ++D) {
@@ -2497,6 +2502,9 @@ Sema::InstantiateClassMembers(SourceLocation PointOfInstantiation,
InstantiateFunctionDefinition(PointOfInstantiation, Function);
} else {
Function->setTemplateSpecializationKind(TSK, PointOfInstantiation);
+ if (TSK == TSK_ImplicitInstantiation)
+ PendingLocalImplicitInstantiations.push_back(
+ std::make_pair(Function, PointOfInstantiation));
}
}
} else if (VarDecl *Var = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(*D)) {
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
index f5c4c72cb3..32f304338c 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
@@ -25,6 +25,17 @@
using namespace clang;
+static bool isDeclWithinFunction(const Decl *D) {
+ const DeclContext *DC = D->getDeclContext();
+ if (DC->isFunctionOrMethod())
+ return true;
+
+ if (DC->isRecord())
+ return cast<CXXRecordDecl>(DC)->isLocalClass();
+
+ return false;
+}
+
bool TemplateDeclInstantiator::SubstQualifier(const DeclaratorDecl *OldDecl,
DeclaratorDecl *NewDecl) {
if (!OldDecl->getQualifierLoc())
@@ -657,19 +668,17 @@ Decl *TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitEnumDecl(EnumDecl *D) {
}
}
- if (D->getDeclContext()->isFunctionOrMethod())
- SemaRef.CurrentInstantiationScope->InstantiatedLocal(D, Enum);
-
// C++11 [temp.inst]p1: The implicit instantiation of a class template
// specialization causes the implicit instantiation of the declarations, but
// not the definitions of scoped member enumerations.
- // FIXME: There appears to be no wording for what happens for an enum defined
- // within a block scope, but we treat that much like a member template. Only
- // instantiate the definition when visiting the definition in that case, since
- // we will visit all redeclarations.
- if (!Enum->isScoped() && Def &&
- (!D->getDeclContext()->isFunctionOrMethod() || D->isCompleteDefinition()))
+ //
+ // DR1484 clarifies that enumeration definitions inside of a template
+ // declaration aren't considered entities that can be separately instantiated
+ // from the rest of the entity they are declared inside of.
+ if (isDeclWithinFunction(D) ? D == Def : Def && !Enum->isScoped()) {
+ SemaRef.CurrentInstantiationScope->InstantiatedLocal(D, Enum);
InstantiateEnumDefinition(Enum, Def);
+ }
return Enum;
}
@@ -1120,13 +1129,26 @@ Decl *TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitCXXRecordDecl(CXXRecordDecl *D) {
Record->setObjectOfFriendDecl();
// Make sure that anonymous structs and unions are recorded.
- if (D->isAnonymousStructOrUnion()) {
+ if (D->isAnonymousStructOrUnion())
Record->setAnonymousStructOrUnion(true);
- if (Record->getDeclContext()->getRedeclContext()->isFunctionOrMethod())
- SemaRef.CurrentInstantiationScope->InstantiatedLocal(D, Record);
- }
+
+ if (D->isLocalClass())
+ SemaRef.CurrentInstantiationScope->InstantiatedLocal(D, Record);
Owner->addDecl(Record);
+
+ // DR1484 clarifies that the members of a local class are instantiated as part
+ // of the instantiation of their enclosing entity.
+ if (D->isCompleteDefinition() && D->isLocalClass()) {
+ if (SemaRef.InstantiateClass(D->getLocation(), Record, D, TemplateArgs,
+ TSK_ImplicitInstantiation,
+ /*Complain=*/true)) {
+ llvm_unreachable("InstantiateClass shouldn't fail here!");
+ } else {
+ SemaRef.InstantiateClassMembers(D->getLocation(), Record, TemplateArgs,
+ TSK_ImplicitInstantiation);
+ }
+ }
return Record;
}
diff --git a/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.inst/p1.cpp b/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.inst/p1.cpp
index 8684fc4dab..adf812b714 100644
--- a/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.inst/p1.cpp
+++ b/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.inst/p1.cpp
@@ -33,24 +33,23 @@ namespace ScopedEnum {
ScopedEnum1<double>::E e1; // ok
ScopedEnum1<double>::E e2 = decltype(e2)::e; // expected-note {{in instantiation of enumeration 'ScopedEnum::ScopedEnum1<double>::E' requested here}}
- // The behavior for enums defined within function templates is not clearly
- // specified by the standard. We follow the rules for enums defined within
- // class templates.
+ // DR1484 specifies that enumerations cannot be separately instantiated,
+ // they will be instantiated with the rest of the template declaration.
template<typename T>
int f() {
enum class E {
- e = T::error
+ e = T::error // expected-error {{has no members}}
};
return (int)E();
}
- int test1 = f<int>();
+ int test1 = f<int>(); // expected-note {{here}}
template<typename T>
int g() {
enum class E {
e = T::error // expected-error {{has no members}}
};
- return E::e; // expected-note {{here}}
+ return E::e;
}
int test2 = g<int>(); // expected-note {{here}}
}
diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-local-class.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-local-class.cpp
index c151fbb9a5..2b5db0fda3 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-local-class.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-local-class.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c++11 %s
// expected-no-diagnostics
template<typename T>
void f0() {
@@ -66,3 +66,97 @@ namespace PR8801 {
template void foo<Y>();
}
+
+namespace TemplatePacksAndLambdas {
+ template <typename ...T> int g(T...);
+ struct S {
+ template <typename ...T> static void f(int f = g([]{ static T t; return ++t; }()...)) {}
+ };
+ void h() { S::f<int, int, int>(); }
+}
+
+namespace PR9685 {
+ template <class Thing> void forEach(Thing t) { t.func(); }
+
+ template <typename T> void doIt() {
+ struct Functor {
+ void func() { (void)i; }
+ int i;
+ };
+
+ forEach(Functor());
+ }
+
+ void call() {
+ doIt<int>();
+ }
+}
+
+namespace PR12702 {
+ struct S {
+ template <typename F> bool apply(F f) { return f(); }
+ };
+
+ template <typename> struct T {
+ void foo() {
+ struct F {
+ int x;
+
+ bool operator()() { return x == 0; }
+ };
+
+ S().apply(F());
+ }
+ };
+
+ void call() { T<int>().foo(); }
+}
+
+namespace PR17139 {
+ template <class T> void foo(const T &t) { t.foo(); }
+
+ template <class F> void bar(F *f) {
+ struct B {
+ F *fn;
+ void foo() const { fn(); }
+ } b = { f };
+ foo(b);
+ }
+
+ void go() {}
+
+ void test() { bar(go); }
+}
+
+namespace PR17740 {
+class C {
+public:
+ template <typename T> static void foo(T function);
+ template <typename T> static void bar(T function);
+ template <typename T> static void func(T function);
+};
+
+template <typename T> void C::foo(T function) { function(); }
+
+template <typename T> void C::bar(T function) {
+ foo([&function]() { function(); });
+}
+
+template <typename T> void C::func(T function) {
+ struct Struct {
+ T mFunction;
+
+ Struct(T function) : mFunction(function) {};
+
+ void operator()() {
+ mFunction();
+ };
+ };
+
+ bar(Struct(function));
+}
+
+void call() {
+ C::func([]() {});
+}
+}