From f039e3eb0ffa87aae0e38cec48f367ee179b4de6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 05:18:44 +0000
Subject: Suppress bogus "use of undefined constexpr function" error if the
 function body was erroneous and got discarded.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@181758 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
 lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp                   | 5 +++++
 test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp | 8 ++++++++
 test/SemaCXX/enum-unscoped-nonexistent.cpp | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp b/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
index 0f44985471..2a3efb225b 100644
--- a/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
+++ b/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
@@ -3161,6 +3161,11 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunction(EvalInfo &Info, SourceLocation CallLoc,
       Declaration->isConstexpr())
     return false;
 
+  // Bail out with no diagnostic if the function declaration itself is invalid.
+  // We will have produced a relevant diagnostic while parsing it.
+  if (Declaration->isInvalidDecl())
+    return false;
+
   // Can we evaluate this function call?
   if (Definition && Definition->isConstexpr() && !Definition->isInvalidDecl())
     return true;
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp
index 09a9cb5dd8..97b0b91b99 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp
@@ -1503,3 +1503,11 @@ namespace PR15884 {
   // expected-note@-3 {{pointer to temporary is not a constant expression}}
   // expected-note@-4 {{temporary created here}}
 }
+
+namespace AfterError {
+  // FIXME: Suppress the 'no return statements' diagnostic if the body is invalid.
+  constexpr int error() { // expected-error {{no return statement}}
+    return foobar; // expected-error {{undeclared identifier}}
+  }
+  constexpr int k = error(); // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}}
+}
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/enum-unscoped-nonexistent.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/enum-unscoped-nonexistent.cpp
index e9da38f558..7da9a96d60 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/enum-unscoped-nonexistent.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/enum-unscoped-nonexistent.cpp
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ struct Base {
 template<typename T> struct S : Base {
   enum E : int;
   constexpr int f() const;
-  constexpr int g() const; // expected-note {{declared here}}
+  constexpr int g() const;
   void h();
 };
 template<> enum S<char>::E : int {}; // expected-note {{enum 'S<char>::E' was explicitly specialized here}}
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static_assert(S<int>().f() == 1, "");
 // The unqualified-id here names a member of the current instantiation, which
 // bizarrely might not exist in some instantiations.
 template<typename T> constexpr int S<T>::g() const { return b; } // expected-error {{enumerator 'b' does not exist in instantiation of 'S<char>'}}
-static_assert(S<char>().g() == 1, ""); // expected-note {{here}} expected-error {{not an integral constant expression}} expected-note {{undefined}}
+static_assert(S<char>().g() == 1, ""); // expected-note {{here}} expected-error {{not an integral constant expression}}
 static_assert(S<short>().g() == 2, "");
 static_assert(S<long>().g() == 8, "");
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3