summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/CodeGen/TailDuplication.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEvan Cheng <evan.cheng@apple.com>2011-01-29 04:46:23 +0000
committerEvan Cheng <evan.cheng@apple.com>2011-01-29 04:46:23 +0000
commitc3f507f98a0747bd256e1c13536060b6fc5c4b62 (patch)
tree21d6d7ccd66a19999f470068386986b338c7cbef /lib/CodeGen/TailDuplication.cpp
parentb0a42fdb36b575a8ad939ca9624105908aeedf51 (diff)
downloadllvm-c3f507f98a0747bd256e1c13536060b6fc5c4b62.tar.gz
llvm-c3f507f98a0747bd256e1c13536060b6fc5c4b62.tar.bz2
llvm-c3f507f98a0747bd256e1c13536060b6fc5c4b62.tar.xz
Re-apply r124518 with fix. Watch out for invalidated iterator.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124526 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/TailDuplication.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/CodeGen/TailDuplication.cpp11
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/TailDuplication.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/TailDuplication.cpp
index ce4b1be854..15aed3436c 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/TailDuplication.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/TailDuplication.cpp
@@ -465,9 +465,12 @@ TailDuplicatePass::TailDuplicate(MachineBasicBlock *TailBB, MachineFunction &MF,
MaxDuplicateCount = TailDuplicateSize;
if (PreRegAlloc) {
- // Pre-regalloc tail duplication hurts compile time and doesn't help
- // much except for indirect branches.
- if (TailBB->empty() || !TailBB->back().getDesc().isIndirectBranch())
+ if (TailBB->empty())
+ return false;
+ const TargetInstrDesc &TID = TailBB->back().getDesc();
+ // Pre-regalloc tail duplication hurts compile time and doesn't help
+ // much except for indirect branches and returns.
+ if (!TID.isIndirectBranch() && !TID.isReturn())
return false;
// If the target has hardware branch prediction that can handle indirect
// branches, duplicating them can often make them predictable when there
@@ -502,7 +505,7 @@ TailDuplicatePass::TailDuplicate(MachineBasicBlock *TailBB, MachineFunction &MF,
}
// Heuristically, don't tail-duplicate calls if it would expand code size,
// as it's less likely to be worth the extra cost.
- if (InstrCount > 1 && HasCall)
+ if (InstrCount > 1 && (PreRegAlloc && HasCall))
return false;
DEBUG(dbgs() << "\n*** Tail-duplicating BB#" << TailBB->getNumber() << '\n');