summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrInfo.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHal Finkel <hfinkel@anl.gov>2013-04-06 19:30:30 +0000
committerHal Finkel <hfinkel@anl.gov>2013-04-06 19:30:30 +0000
commit839b9096538f790a2bb060547df24703807cb83b (patch)
tree0cf51af4bf2e88a7a170f6ef96961f35b7699a07 /lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrInfo.cpp
parent012ffd56059576d4a0ee523f673b3190b1f03311 (diff)
downloadllvm-839b9096538f790a2bb060547df24703807cb83b.tar.gz
llvm-839b9096538f790a2bb060547df24703807cb83b.tar.bz2
llvm-839b9096538f790a2bb060547df24703807cb83b.tar.xz
Implement PPCInstrInfo::FoldImmediate
There are certain PPC instructions into which we can fold a zero immediate operand. We can detect such cases by looking at the register class required by the using operand (so long as it is not otherwise constrained). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178961 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrInfo.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrInfo.cpp68
1 files changed, 68 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrInfo.cpp b/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrInfo.cpp
index b0dc99977c..e106f2201d 100644
--- a/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrInfo.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrInfo.cpp
@@ -806,6 +806,74 @@ ReverseBranchCondition(SmallVectorImpl<MachineOperand> &Cond) const {
return false;
}
+bool PPCInstrInfo::FoldImmediate(MachineInstr *UseMI, MachineInstr *DefMI,
+ unsigned Reg, MachineRegisterInfo *MRI) const {
+ // For some instructions, it is legal to fold ZERO into the RA register field.
+ // A zero immediate should always be loaded with a single li.
+ unsigned DefOpc = DefMI->getOpcode();
+ if (DefOpc != PPC::LI && DefOpc != PPC::LI8)
+ return false;
+ if (!DefMI->getOperand(1).isImm())
+ return false;
+ if (DefMI->getOperand(1).getImm() != 0)
+ return false;
+
+ // Note that we cannot here invert the arguments of an isel in order to fold
+ // a ZERO into what is presented as the second argument. All we have here
+ // is the condition bit, and that might come from a CR-logical bit operation.
+
+ const MCInstrDesc &UseMCID = UseMI->getDesc();
+
+ // Only fold into real machine instructions.
+ if (UseMCID.isPseudo())
+ return false;
+
+ unsigned UseIdx;
+ for (UseIdx = 0; UseIdx < UseMI->getNumOperands(); ++UseIdx)
+ if (UseMI->getOperand(UseIdx).isReg() &&
+ UseMI->getOperand(UseIdx).getReg() == Reg)
+ break;
+
+ assert(UseIdx < UseMI->getNumOperands() && "Cannot find Reg in UseMI");
+ assert(UseIdx < UseMCID.getNumOperands() && "No operand description for Reg");
+
+ const MCOperandInfo *UseInfo = &UseMCID.OpInfo[UseIdx];
+
+ // We can fold the zero if this register requires a GPRC_NOR0/G8RC_NOX0
+ // register (which might also be specified as a pointer class kind).
+ if (UseInfo->isLookupPtrRegClass()) {
+ if (UseInfo->RegClass /* Kind */ != 1)
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ if (UseInfo->RegClass != PPC::GPRC_NOR0RegClassID &&
+ UseInfo->RegClass != PPC::G8RC_NOX0RegClassID)
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ // Make sure this is not tied to an output register (or otherwise
+ // constrained). This is true for ST?UX registers, for example, which
+ // are tied to their output registers.
+ if (UseInfo->Constraints != 0)
+ return false;
+
+ unsigned ZeroReg;
+ if (UseInfo->isLookupPtrRegClass()) {
+ bool isPPC64 = TM.getSubtargetImpl()->isPPC64();
+ ZeroReg = isPPC64 ? PPC::ZERO8 : PPC::ZERO;
+ } else {
+ ZeroReg = UseInfo->RegClass == PPC::G8RC_NOX0RegClassID ?
+ PPC::ZERO8 : PPC::ZERO;
+ }
+
+ bool DeleteDef = MRI->hasOneNonDBGUse(Reg);
+ UseMI->getOperand(UseIdx).setReg(ZeroReg);
+
+ if (DeleteDef)
+ DefMI->eraseFromParent();
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/// GetInstSize - Return the number of bytes of code the specified
/// instruction may be. This returns the maximum number of bytes.
///