diff options
| author | Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com> | 2013-11-26 10:46:15 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com> | 2013-11-26 10:46:15 +0000 |
| commit | 9ed81d16f71b60c246a7b8e9ed4fdd58a48ce4b9 (patch) | |
| tree | 91c9441f2fe1f5445800c27781ad81dd48738f2e /lib/Target/X86 | |
| parent | d1b770d24dea3dc93a7c0f75cf61e3400cde73b0 (diff) | |
| download | llvm-9ed81d16f71b60c246a7b8e9ed4fdd58a48ce4b9.tar.gz llvm-9ed81d16f71b60c246a7b8e9ed4fdd58a48ce4b9.tar.bz2 llvm-9ed81d16f71b60c246a7b8e9ed4fdd58a48ce4b9.tar.xz | |
Merging r195679:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r195679 | rafael | 2013-11-25 12:15:14 -0800 (Mon, 25 Nov 2013) | 12 lines
Don't use nopl in cpus that don't support it.
Patch by Mikulas Patocka. I added the test. I checked that for cpu names that
gas knows about, it also doesn't generate nopl.
The modified cpus:
i686 - there are i686-class CPUs that don't have nopl: Via c3, Transmeta
Crusoe, Microsoft VirtualBox - see
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=775414
k6, k6-2, k6-3, winchip-c6, winchip2 - these are 586-class CPUs
via c3 c3-2 - see https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19733 as a proof that
Via c3 and c3-Nehemiah don't have nopl
------------------------------------------------------------------------
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_34@195730 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Target/X86')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86AsmBackend.cpp | 6 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86AsmBackend.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86AsmBackend.cpp index c1a710be5c..1c6f07121d 100644 --- a/lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86AsmBackend.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86AsmBackend.cpp @@ -309,8 +309,12 @@ bool X86AsmBackend::writeNopData(uint64_t Count, MCObjectWriter *OW) const { // This CPU doesnt support long nops. If needed add more. // FIXME: Can we get this from the subtarget somehow? + // FIXME: We could generated something better than plain 0x90. if (CPU == "generic" || CPU == "i386" || CPU == "i486" || CPU == "i586" || - CPU == "pentium" || CPU == "pentium-mmx" || CPU == "geode") { + CPU == "pentium" || CPU == "pentium-mmx" || CPU == "i686" || + CPU == "k6" || CPU == "k6-2" || CPU == "k6-3" || CPU == "geode" || + CPU == "winchip-c6" || CPU == "winchip2" || CPU == "c3" || + CPU == "c3-2") { for (uint64_t i = 0; i < Count; ++i) OW->Write8(0x90); return true; |