summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Trick <atrick@apple.com>2011-04-13 00:38:32 +0000
committerAndrew Trick <atrick@apple.com>2011-04-13 00:38:32 +0000
commit87896d9368e08d93493427ce7bf8272d1e5cca35 (patch)
treed3183747b2917bf4e1254c7a331ff86fd3352a2f /lib
parentf93f7b2446bec3febc30b7136e18704664bd98cc (diff)
downloadllvm-87896d9368e08d93493427ce7bf8272d1e5cca35.tar.gz
llvm-87896d9368e08d93493427ce7bf8272d1e5cca35.tar.bz2
llvm-87896d9368e08d93493427ce7bf8272d1e5cca35.tar.xz
Recommit r129383. PreRA scheduler heuristic fixes: VRegCycle, TokenFactor latency.
Additional fixes: Do something reasonable for subtargets with generic itineraries by handle node latency the same as for an empty itinerary. Now nodes default to unit latency unless an itinerary explicitly specifies a zero cycle stage or it is a TokenFactor chain. Original fixes: UnitsSharePred was a source of randomness in the scheduler: node priority depended on the queue data structure. I rewrote the recent VRegCycle heuristics to completely replace the old heuristic without any randomness. To make the ndoe latency adjustments work, I also needed to do something a little more reasonable with TokenFactor. I gave it zero latency to its consumers and always schedule it as low as possible. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@129421 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r--lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGRRList.cpp286
-rw-r--r--lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGSDNodes.cpp60
2 files changed, 190 insertions, 156 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGRRList.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGRRList.cpp
index b2e9c15b68..ac2f3d5c85 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGRRList.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGRRList.cpp
@@ -102,11 +102,11 @@ static cl::opt<unsigned> AvgIPC(
#ifndef NDEBUG
namespace {
// For sched=list-ilp, Count the number of times each factor comes into play.
- enum { FactPressureDiff, FactRegUses, FactHeight, FactDepth, FactStatic,
- FactOther, NumFactors };
+ enum { FactPressureDiff, FactRegUses, FactStall, FactHeight, FactDepth,
+ FactStatic, FactOther, NumFactors };
}
static const char *FactorName[NumFactors] =
-{"PressureDiff", "RegUses", "Height", "Depth","Static", "Other"};
+{"PressureDiff", "RegUses", "Stall", "Height", "Depth","Static", "Other"};
static int FactorCount[NumFactors];
#endif //!NDEBUG
@@ -463,6 +463,13 @@ void ScheduleDAGRRList::AdvancePastStalls(SUnit *SU) {
if (DisableSchedCycles)
return;
+ // FIXME: Nodes such as CopyFromReg probably should not advance the current
+ // cycle. Otherwise, we can wrongly mask real stalls. If the non-machine node
+ // has predecessors the cycle will be advanced when they are scheduled.
+ // But given the crude nature of modeling latency though such nodes, we
+ // currently need to treat these nodes like real instructions.
+ // if (!SU->getNode() || !SU->getNode()->isMachineOpcode()) return;
+
unsigned ReadyCycle = isBottomUp ? SU->getHeight() : SU->getDepth();
// Bump CurCycle to account for latency. We assume the latency of other
@@ -533,6 +540,8 @@ void ScheduleDAGRRList::EmitNode(SUnit *SU) {
}
}
+static void resetVRegCycle(SUnit *SU);
+
/// ScheduleNodeBottomUp - Add the node to the schedule. Decrement the pending
/// count of its predecessors. If a predecessor pending count is zero, add it to
/// the Available queue.
@@ -542,7 +551,8 @@ void ScheduleDAGRRList::ScheduleNodeBottomUp(SUnit *SU) {
#ifndef NDEBUG
if (CurCycle < SU->getHeight())
- DEBUG(dbgs() << " Height [" << SU->getHeight() << "] pipeline stall!\n");
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << " Height [" << SU->getHeight()
+ << "] pipeline stall!\n");
#endif
// FIXME: Do not modify node height. It may interfere with
@@ -559,7 +569,7 @@ void ScheduleDAGRRList::ScheduleNodeBottomUp(SUnit *SU) {
AvailableQueue->ScheduledNode(SU);
// If HazardRec is disabled, and each inst counts as one cycle, then
- // advance CurCycle before ReleasePredecessors to avoid useles pushed to
+ // advance CurCycle before ReleasePredecessors to avoid useless pushes to
// PendingQueue for schedulers that implement HasReadyFilter.
if (!HazardRec->isEnabled() && AvgIPC < 2)
AdvanceToCycle(CurCycle + 1);
@@ -580,20 +590,25 @@ void ScheduleDAGRRList::ScheduleNodeBottomUp(SUnit *SU) {
}
}
+ resetVRegCycle(SU);
+
SU->isScheduled = true;
// Conditions under which the scheduler should eagerly advance the cycle:
// (1) No available instructions
// (2) All pipelines full, so available instructions must have hazards.
//
- // If HazardRec is disabled, the cycle was advanced earlier.
+ // If HazardRec is disabled, the cycle was pre-advanced before calling
+ // ReleasePredecessors. In that case, IssueCount should remain 0.
//
// Check AvailableQueue after ReleasePredecessors in case of zero latency.
- ++IssueCount;
- if ((HazardRec->isEnabled() && HazardRec->atIssueLimit())
- || (!HazardRec->isEnabled() && AvgIPC > 1 && IssueCount == AvgIPC)
- || AvailableQueue->empty())
- AdvanceToCycle(CurCycle + 1);
+ if (HazardRec->isEnabled() || AvgIPC > 1) {
+ if (SU->getNode() && SU->getNode()->isMachineOpcode())
+ ++IssueCount;
+ if ((HazardRec->isEnabled() && HazardRec->atIssueLimit())
+ || (!HazardRec->isEnabled() && IssueCount == AvgIPC))
+ AdvanceToCycle(CurCycle + 1);
+ }
}
/// CapturePred - This does the opposite of ReleasePred. Since SU is being
@@ -1220,7 +1235,7 @@ void ScheduleDAGRRList::ListScheduleBottomUp() {
// priority. If it is not ready put it back. Schedule the node.
Sequence.reserve(SUnits.size());
while (!AvailableQueue->empty()) {
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "\n*** Examining Available\n";
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nExamining Available:\n";
AvailableQueue->dump(this));
// Pick the best node to schedule taking all constraints into
@@ -1661,17 +1676,6 @@ void RegReductionPQBase::CalculateSethiUllmanNumbers() {
CalcNodeSethiUllmanNumber(&(*SUnits)[i], SethiUllmanNumbers);
}
-void RegReductionPQBase::initNodes(std::vector<SUnit> &sunits) {
- SUnits = &sunits;
- // Add pseudo dependency edges for two-address nodes.
- AddPseudoTwoAddrDeps();
- // Reroute edges to nodes with multiple uses.
- if (!TracksRegPressure)
- PrescheduleNodesWithMultipleUses();
- // Calculate node priorities.
- CalculateSethiUllmanNumbers();
-}
-
void RegReductionPQBase::addNode(const SUnit *SU) {
unsigned SUSize = SethiUllmanNumbers.size();
if (SUnits->size() > SUSize)
@@ -2008,7 +2012,29 @@ static unsigned calcMaxScratches(const SUnit *SU) {
return Scratches;
}
-/// hasOnlyLiveOutUse - Return true if SU has a single value successor that is a
+/// hasOnlyLiveInOpers - Return true if SU has only value predecessors that are
+/// CopyFromReg from a virtual register.
+static bool hasOnlyLiveInOpers(const SUnit *SU) {
+ bool RetVal = false;
+ for (SUnit::const_pred_iterator I = SU->Preds.begin(), E = SU->Preds.end();
+ I != E; ++I) {
+ if (I->isCtrl()) continue;
+ const SUnit *PredSU = I->getSUnit();
+ if (PredSU->getNode() &&
+ PredSU->getNode()->getOpcode() == ISD::CopyFromReg) {
+ unsigned Reg =
+ cast<RegisterSDNode>(PredSU->getNode()->getOperand(1))->getReg();
+ if (TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg)) {
+ RetVal = true;
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+ return false;
+ }
+ return RetVal;
+}
+
+/// hasOnlyLiveOutUses - Return true if SU has only value successors that are
/// CopyToReg to a virtual register. This SU def is probably a liveout and
/// it has no other use. It should be scheduled closer to the terminator.
static bool hasOnlyLiveOutUses(const SUnit *SU) {
@@ -2030,62 +2056,71 @@ static bool hasOnlyLiveOutUses(const SUnit *SU) {
return RetVal;
}
-/// UnitsSharePred - Return true if the two scheduling units share a common
-/// data predecessor.
-static bool UnitsSharePred(const SUnit *left, const SUnit *right) {
- SmallSet<const SUnit*, 4> Preds;
- for (SUnit::const_pred_iterator I = left->Preds.begin(),E = left->Preds.end();
+// Set isVRegCycle for a node with only live in opers and live out uses. Also
+// set isVRegCycle for its CopyFromReg operands.
+//
+// This is only relevant for single-block loops, in which case the VRegCycle
+// node is likely an induction variable in which the operand and target virtual
+// registers should be coalesced (e.g. pre/post increment values). Setting the
+// isVRegCycle flag helps the scheduler prioritize other uses of the same
+// CopyFromReg so that this node becomes the virtual register "kill". This
+// avoids interference between the values live in and out of the block and
+// eliminates a copy inside the loop.
+static void initVRegCycle(SUnit *SU) {
+ if (DisableSchedVRegCycle)
+ return;
+
+ if (!hasOnlyLiveInOpers(SU) || !hasOnlyLiveOutUses(SU))
+ return;
+
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "VRegCycle: SU(" << SU->NodeNum << ")\n");
+
+ SU->isVRegCycle = true;
+
+ for (SUnit::const_pred_iterator I = SU->Preds.begin(), E = SU->Preds.end();
I != E; ++I) {
- if (I->isCtrl()) continue; // ignore chain preds
- Preds.insert(I->getSUnit());
+ if (I->isCtrl()) continue;
+ I->getSUnit()->isVRegCycle = true;
}
- for (SUnit::const_pred_iterator I = right->Preds.begin(),E = right->Preds.end();
+}
+
+// After scheduling the definition of a VRegCycle, clear the isVRegCycle flag of
+// CopyFromReg operands. We should no longer penalize other uses of this VReg.
+static void resetVRegCycle(SUnit *SU) {
+ if (!SU->isVRegCycle)
+ return;
+
+ for (SUnit::const_pred_iterator I = SU->Preds.begin(),E = SU->Preds.end();
I != E; ++I) {
if (I->isCtrl()) continue; // ignore chain preds
- if (Preds.count(I->getSUnit()))
- return true;
+ SUnit *PredSU = I->getSUnit();
+ if (PredSU->isVRegCycle) {
+ assert(PredSU->getNode()->getOpcode() == ISD::CopyFromReg &&
+ "VRegCycle def must be CopyFromReg");
+ I->getSUnit()->isVRegCycle = 0;
+ }
}
- return false;
}
-// Return true if the virtual register defined by VRCycleSU may interfere with
-// VRUseSU.
-//
-// Note: We may consider two SU's that use the same value live into a loop as
-// interferng even though the value is not an induction variable. This is an
-// unfortunate consequence of scheduling on the selection DAG.
-static bool checkVRegCycleInterference(const SUnit *VRCycleSU,
- const SUnit *VRUseSU) {
- for (SUnit::const_pred_iterator I = VRCycleSU->Preds.begin(),
- E = VRCycleSU->Preds.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+// Return true if this SUnit uses a CopyFromReg node marked as a VRegCycle. This
+// means a node that defines the VRegCycle has not been scheduled yet.
+static bool hasVRegCycleUse(const SUnit *SU) {
+ // If this SU also defines the VReg, don't hoist it as a "use".
+ if (SU->isVRegCycle)
+ return false;
+
+ for (SUnit::const_pred_iterator I = SU->Preds.begin(),E = SU->Preds.end();
+ I != E; ++I) {
if (I->isCtrl()) continue; // ignore chain preds
- SDNode *InNode = I->getSUnit()->getNode();
- if (!InNode || InNode->getOpcode() != ISD::CopyFromReg)
- continue;
- for (SUnit::const_pred_iterator II = VRUseSU->Preds.begin(),
- EE = VRUseSU->Preds.end(); II != EE; ++II) {
- if (II->getSUnit() == I->getSUnit())
- return true;
+ if (I->getSUnit()->isVRegCycle &&
+ I->getSUnit()->getNode()->getOpcode() == ISD::CopyFromReg) {
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << " VReg cycle use: SU (" << SU->NodeNum << ")\n");
+ return true;
}
}
return false;
}
-// Compare the VRegCycle properties of the nodes.
-// Return -1 if left has higher priority, 1 if right has higher priority.
-// Return 0 if priority is equivalent.
-static int BUCompareVRegCycle(const SUnit *left, const SUnit *right) {
- if (left->isVRegCycle && !right->isVRegCycle) {
- if (checkVRegCycleInterference(left, right))
- return -1;
- }
- else if (!left->isVRegCycle && right->isVRegCycle) {
- if (checkVRegCycleInterference(right, left))
- return 1;
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
// Check for either a dependence (latency) or resource (hazard) stall.
//
// Note: The ScheduleHazardRecognizer interface requires a non-const SU.
@@ -2101,23 +2136,12 @@ static bool BUHasStall(SUnit *SU, int Height, RegReductionPQBase *SPQ) {
// Return 0 if latency-based priority is equivalent.
static int BUCompareLatency(SUnit *left, SUnit *right, bool checkPref,
RegReductionPQBase *SPQ) {
- // If the two nodes share an operand and one of them has a single
- // use that is a live out copy, favor the one that is live out. Otherwise
- // it will be difficult to eliminate the copy if the instruction is a
- // loop induction variable update. e.g.
- // BB:
- // sub r1, r3, #1
- // str r0, [r2, r3]
- // mov r3, r1
- // cmp
- // bne BB
- bool SharePred = UnitsSharePred(left, right);
- // FIXME: Only adjust if BB is a loop back edge.
- // FIXME: What's the cost of a copy?
- int LBonus = (SharePred && hasOnlyLiveOutUses(left)) ? 1 : 0;
- int RBonus = (SharePred && hasOnlyLiveOutUses(right)) ? 1 : 0;
- int LHeight = (int)left->getHeight() - LBonus;
- int RHeight = (int)right->getHeight() - RBonus;
+ // Scheduling an instruction that uses a VReg whose postincrement has not yet
+ // been scheduled will induce a copy. Model this as an extra cycle of latency.
+ int LPenalty = hasVRegCycleUse(left) ? 1 : 0;
+ int RPenalty = hasVRegCycleUse(right) ? 1 : 0;
+ int LHeight = (int)left->getHeight() + LPenalty;
+ int RHeight = (int)right->getHeight() + RPenalty;
bool LStall = (!checkPref || left->SchedulingPref == Sched::Latency) &&
BUHasStall(left, LHeight, SPQ);
@@ -2128,36 +2152,47 @@ static int BUCompareLatency(SUnit *left, SUnit *right, bool checkPref,
// If scheduling either one of the node will cause a pipeline stall, sort
// them according to their height.
if (LStall) {
- if (!RStall)
+ if (!RStall) {
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactStall]);
return 1;
- if (LHeight != RHeight)
+ }
+ if (LHeight != RHeight) {
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactStall]);
return LHeight > RHeight ? 1 : -1;
- } else if (RStall)
+ }
+ } else if (RStall) {
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactStall]);
return -1;
+ }
// If either node is scheduling for latency, sort them by height/depth
// and latency.
if (!checkPref || (left->SchedulingPref == Sched::Latency ||
right->SchedulingPref == Sched::Latency)) {
if (DisableSchedCycles) {
- if (LHeight != RHeight)
+ if (LHeight != RHeight) {
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactHeight]);
return LHeight > RHeight ? 1 : -1;
+ }
}
else {
// If neither instruction stalls (!LStall && !RStall) then
// its height is already covered so only its depth matters. We also reach
// this if both stall but have the same height.
- unsigned LDepth = left->getDepth();
- unsigned RDepth = right->getDepth();
+ int LDepth = left->getDepth() - LPenalty;
+ int RDepth = right->getDepth() - RPenalty;
if (LDepth != RDepth) {
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactDepth]);
DEBUG(dbgs() << " Comparing latency of SU (" << left->NodeNum
<< ") depth " << LDepth << " vs SU (" << right->NodeNum
<< ") depth " << RDepth << "\n");
return LDepth < RDepth ? 1 : -1;
}
}
- if (left->Latency != right->Latency)
+ if (left->Latency != right->Latency) {
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactOther]);
return left->Latency > right->Latency ? 1 : -1;
+ }
}
return 0;
}
@@ -2169,7 +2204,19 @@ static bool BURRSort(SUnit *left, SUnit *right, RegReductionPQBase *SPQ) {
DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactStatic]);
return LPriority > RPriority;
}
- DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactOther]);
+ else if(LPriority == 0) {
+ // Schedule zero-latency TokenFactor below any other special
+ // nodes. The alternative may be to avoid artificially boosting the
+ // TokenFactor's height when it is scheduled, but we currently rely on an
+ // instruction's final height to equal the cycle in which it is scheduled,
+ // so heights are monotonically increasing.
+ unsigned LOpc = left->getNode() ? left->getNode()->getOpcode() : 0;
+ unsigned ROpc = right->getNode() ? right->getNode()->getOpcode() : 0;
+ if (LOpc == ISD::TokenFactor)
+ return false;
+ if (ROpc == ISD::TokenFactor)
+ return true;
+ }
// Try schedule def + use closer when Sethi-Ullman numbers are the same.
// e.g.
@@ -2190,14 +2237,18 @@ static bool BURRSort(SUnit *left, SUnit *right, RegReductionPQBase *SPQ) {
// This creates more short live intervals.
unsigned LDist = closestSucc(left);
unsigned RDist = closestSucc(right);
- if (LDist != RDist)
+ if (LDist != RDist) {
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactOther]);
return LDist < RDist;
+ }
// How many registers becomes live when the node is scheduled.
unsigned LScratch = calcMaxScratches(left);
unsigned RScratch = calcMaxScratches(right);
- if (LScratch != RScratch)
+ if (LScratch != RScratch) {
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactOther]);
return LScratch > RScratch;
+ }
if (!DisableSchedCycles) {
int result = BUCompareLatency(left, right, false /*checkPref*/, SPQ);
@@ -2205,15 +2256,20 @@ static bool BURRSort(SUnit *left, SUnit *right, RegReductionPQBase *SPQ) {
return result > 0;
}
else {
- if (left->getHeight() != right->getHeight())
+ if (left->getHeight() != right->getHeight()) {
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactHeight]);
return left->getHeight() > right->getHeight();
+ }
- if (left->getDepth() != right->getDepth())
+ if (left->getDepth() != right->getDepth()) {
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactDepth]);
return left->getDepth() < right->getDepth();
+ }
}
assert(left->NodeQueueId && right->NodeQueueId &&
"NodeQueueId cannot be zero");
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactOther]);
return (left->NodeQueueId > right->NodeQueueId);
}
@@ -2264,24 +2320,22 @@ bool hybrid_ls_rr_sort::operator()(SUnit *left, SUnit *right) const {
// Avoid causing spills. If register pressure is high, schedule for
// register pressure reduction.
if (LHigh && !RHigh) {
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactPressureDiff]);
DEBUG(dbgs() << " pressure SU(" << left->NodeNum << ") > SU("
<< right->NodeNum << ")\n");
return true;
}
else if (!LHigh && RHigh) {
+ DEBUG(++FactorCount[FactPressureDiff]);
DEBUG(dbgs() << " pressure SU(" << right->NodeNum << ") > SU("
<< left->NodeNum << ")\n");
return false;
}
- int result = 0;
- if (!DisableSchedVRegCycle) {
- result = BUCompareVRegCycle(left, right);
- }
- if (result == 0 && !LHigh && !RHigh) {
- result = BUCompareLatency(left, right, true /*checkPref*/, SPQ);
+ if (!LHigh && !RHigh) {
+ int result = BUCompareLatency(left, right, true /*checkPref*/, SPQ);
+ if (result != 0)
+ return result > 0;
}
- if (result != 0)
- return result > 0;
return BURRSort(left, right, SPQ);
}
@@ -2347,12 +2401,6 @@ bool ilp_ls_rr_sort::operator()(SUnit *left, SUnit *right) const {
if (RReduce && !LReduce) return true;
}
- if (!DisableSchedVRegCycle) {
- int result = BUCompareVRegCycle(left, right);
- if (result != 0)
- return result > 0;
- }
-
if (!DisableSchedLiveUses && (LLiveUses != RLiveUses)) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Live uses SU(" << left->NodeNum << "): " << LLiveUses
<< " != SU(" << right->NodeNum << "): " << RLiveUses << "\n");
@@ -2391,6 +2439,24 @@ bool ilp_ls_rr_sort::operator()(SUnit *left, SUnit *right) const {
return BURRSort(left, right, SPQ);
}
+void RegReductionPQBase::initNodes(std::vector<SUnit> &sunits) {
+ SUnits = &sunits;
+ // Add pseudo dependency edges for two-address nodes.
+ AddPseudoTwoAddrDeps();
+ // Reroute edges to nodes with multiple uses.
+ if (!TracksRegPressure)
+ PrescheduleNodesWithMultipleUses();
+ // Calculate node priorities.
+ CalculateSethiUllmanNumbers();
+
+ // For single block loops, mark nodes that look like canonical IV increments.
+ if (scheduleDAG->BB->isSuccessor(scheduleDAG->BB)) {
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = sunits.size(); i != e; ++i) {
+ initVRegCycle(&sunits[i]);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Preschedule for Register Pressure
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGSDNodes.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGSDNodes.cpp
index 24a1937c44..078533be84 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGSDNodes.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGSDNodes.cpp
@@ -342,10 +342,6 @@ void ScheduleDAGSDNodes::BuildSchedUnits() {
assert(N->getNodeId() == -1 && "Node already inserted!");
N->setNodeId(NodeSUnit->NodeNum);
- // Set isVRegCycle if the node operands are live into and value is live out
- // of a single block loop.
- InitVRegCycleFlag(NodeSUnit);
-
// Compute NumRegDefsLeft. This must be done before AddSchedEdges.
InitNumRegDefsLeft(NodeSUnit);
@@ -417,6 +413,10 @@ void ScheduleDAGSDNodes::AddSchedEdges() {
// If this is a ctrl dep, latency is 1.
unsigned OpLatency = isChain ? 1 : OpSU->Latency;
+ // Special-case TokenFactor chains as zero-latency.
+ if(isChain && OpN->getOpcode() == ISD::TokenFactor)
+ OpLatency = 0;
+
const SDep &dep = SDep(OpSU, isChain ? SDep::Order : SDep::Data,
OpLatency, PhysReg);
if (!isChain && !UnitLatencies) {
@@ -512,47 +512,6 @@ void ScheduleDAGSDNodes::RegDefIter::Advance() {
}
}
-// Set isVRegCycle if this node's single use is CopyToReg and its only active
-// data operands are CopyFromReg.
-//
-// This is only relevant for single-block loops, in which case the VRegCycle
-// node is likely an induction variable in which the operand and target virtual
-// registers should be coalesced (e.g. pre/post increment values). Setting the
-// isVRegCycle flag helps the scheduler prioritize other uses of the same
-// CopyFromReg so that this node becomes the virtual register "kill". This
-// avoids interference between the values live in and out of the block and
-// eliminates a copy inside the loop.
-void ScheduleDAGSDNodes::InitVRegCycleFlag(SUnit *SU) {
- if (!BB->isSuccessor(BB))
- return;
-
- SDNode *N = SU->getNode();
- if (N->getGluedNode())
- return;
-
- if (!N->hasOneUse() || N->use_begin()->getOpcode() != ISD::CopyToReg)
- return;
-
- bool FoundLiveIn = false;
- for (SDNode::op_iterator OI = N->op_begin(), E = N->op_end(); OI != E; ++OI) {
- EVT OpVT = OI->getValueType();
- assert(OpVT != MVT::Glue && "Glued nodes should be in same sunit!");
-
- if (OpVT == MVT::Other)
- continue; // ignore chain operands
-
- if (isPassiveNode(OI->getNode()))
- continue; // ignore constants and such
-
- if (OI->getNode()->getOpcode() != ISD::CopyFromReg)
- return;
-
- FoundLiveIn = true;
- }
- if (FoundLiveIn)
- SU->isVRegCycle = true;
-}
-
void ScheduleDAGSDNodes::InitNumRegDefsLeft(SUnit *SU) {
assert(SU->NumRegDefsLeft == 0 && "expect a new node");
for (RegDefIter I(SU, this); I.IsValid(); I.Advance()) {
@@ -562,6 +521,16 @@ void ScheduleDAGSDNodes::InitNumRegDefsLeft(SUnit *SU) {
}
void ScheduleDAGSDNodes::ComputeLatency(SUnit *SU) {
+ SDNode *N = SU->getNode();
+
+ // TokenFactor operands are considered zero latency, and some schedulers
+ // (e.g. Top-Down list) may rely on the fact that operand latency is nonzero
+ // whenever node latency is nonzero.
+ if (N && N->getOpcode() == ISD::TokenFactor) {
+ SU->Latency = 0;
+ return;
+ }
+
// Check to see if the scheduler cares about latencies.
if (ForceUnitLatencies()) {
SU->Latency = 1;
@@ -569,7 +538,6 @@ void ScheduleDAGSDNodes::ComputeLatency(SUnit *SU) {
}
if (!InstrItins || InstrItins->isEmpty()) {
- SDNode *N = SU->getNode();
if (N && N->isMachineOpcode() &&
TII->isHighLatencyDef(N->getMachineOpcode()))
SU->Latency = HighLatencyCycles;