summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp41
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
index e7fe672ad3..b77f8d6ddc 100644
--- a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
+++ b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
@@ -1700,3 +1700,44 @@ unsigned SCEVExpander::replaceCongruentIVs(Loop *L, const DominatorTree *DT,
}
return NumElim;
}
+
+namespace {
+// Search for a SCEV subexpression that is not safe to expand. Any expression
+// that may expand to a !isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute value is unsafe, namely
+// UDiv expressions. We don't know if the UDiv is derived from an IR divide
+// instruction, but the important thing is that we prove the denominator is
+// nonzero before expansion.
+//
+// IVUsers already checks that IV-derived expressions are safe. So this check is
+// only needed when the expression includes some subexpression that is not IV
+// derived.
+//
+// Currently, we only allow division by a nonzero constant here. If this is
+// inadequate, we could easily allow division by SCEVUnknown by using
+// ValueTracking to check isKnownNonZero().
+struct SCEVFindUnsafe {
+ bool IsUnsafe;
+
+ SCEVFindUnsafe(): IsUnsafe(false) {}
+
+ bool follow(const SCEV *S) {
+ const SCEVUDivExpr *D = dyn_cast<SCEVUDivExpr>(S);
+ if (!D)
+ return true;
+ const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(D->getRHS());
+ if (SC && !SC->getValue()->isZero())
+ return true;
+ IsUnsafe = true;
+ return false;
+ }
+ bool isDone() const { return IsUnsafe; }
+};
+}
+
+namespace llvm {
+bool isSafeToExpand(const SCEV *S) {
+ SCEVFindUnsafe Search;
+ visitAll(S, Search);
+ return !Search.IsUnsafe;
+}
+}