summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp149
1 files changed, 85 insertions, 64 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp
index 2002e680d1..1da6a070d9 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
#define DEBUG_TYPE "tailcallelim"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/CaptureTracking.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/InlineCost.h"
@@ -69,6 +70,7 @@
#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CallSite.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/ValueHandle.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
@@ -129,34 +131,42 @@ void TailCallElim::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.addRequired<TargetTransformInfo>();
}
-/// AllocaMightEscapeToCalls - Return true if this alloca may be accessed by
-/// callees of this function. We only do very simple analysis right now, this
-/// could be expanded in the future to use mod/ref information for particular
-/// call sites if desired.
-static bool AllocaMightEscapeToCalls(AllocaInst *AI) {
- // FIXME: do simple 'address taken' analysis.
- return true;
+/// CanTRE - Scan the specified basic block for alloca instructions.
+/// If it contains any that are variable-sized or not in the entry block,
+/// returns false.
+static bool CanTRE(AllocaInst *AI) {
+ // Because of PR962, we don't TRE allocas outside the entry block.
+
+ // If this alloca is in the body of the function, or if it is a variable
+ // sized allocation, we cannot tail call eliminate calls marked 'tail'
+ // with this mechanism.
+ BasicBlock *BB = AI->getParent();
+ return BB == &BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock() &&
+ isa<ConstantInt>(AI->getArraySize());
}
-/// CheckForEscapingAllocas - Scan the specified basic block for alloca
-/// instructions. If it contains any that might be accessed by calls, return
-/// true.
-static bool CheckForEscapingAllocas(BasicBlock *BB,
- bool &CannotTCETailMarkedCall) {
- bool RetVal = false;
- for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); I != E; ++I)
- if (AllocaInst *AI = dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(I)) {
- RetVal |= AllocaMightEscapeToCalls(AI);
-
- // If this alloca is in the body of the function, or if it is a variable
- // sized allocation, we cannot tail call eliminate calls marked 'tail'
- // with this mechanism.
- if (BB != &BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock() ||
- !isa<ConstantInt>(AI->getArraySize()))
- CannotTCETailMarkedCall = true;
- }
- return RetVal;
-}
+struct AllocaCaptureTracker : public CaptureTracker {
+ AllocaCaptureTracker() : Captured(false) {}
+
+ void tooManyUses() { Captured = true; }
+
+ bool shouldExplore(Use *U) {
+ Value *V = U->getUser();
+ if (isa<CallInst>(V) || isa<InvokeInst>(V))
+ UsesAlloca.insert(V);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ bool captured(Use *U) {
+ if (isa<ReturnInst>(U->getUser()))
+ return false;
+ Captured = true;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ bool Captured;
+ SmallPtrSet<const Value *, 64> UsesAlloca;
+};
bool TailCallElim::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
// If this function is a varargs function, we won't be able to PHI the args
@@ -168,41 +178,44 @@ bool TailCallElim::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
bool TailCallsAreMarkedTail = false;
SmallVector<PHINode*, 8> ArgumentPHIs;
bool MadeChange = false;
- bool FunctionContainsEscapingAllocas = false;
- // CannotTCETailMarkedCall - If true, we cannot perform TCE on tail calls
+ // CanTRETailMarkedCall - If false, we cannot perform TRE on tail calls
// marked with the 'tail' attribute, because doing so would cause the stack
- // size to increase (real TCE would deallocate variable sized allocas, TCE
+ // size to increase (real TRE would deallocate variable sized allocas, TRE
// doesn't).
- bool CannotTCETailMarkedCall = false;
-
- // Loop over the function, looking for any returning blocks, and keeping track
- // of whether this function has any non-trivially used allocas.
- for (Function::iterator BB = F.begin(), E = F.end(); BB != E; ++BB) {
- if (FunctionContainsEscapingAllocas && CannotTCETailMarkedCall)
- break;
-
- FunctionContainsEscapingAllocas |=
- CheckForEscapingAllocas(BB, CannotTCETailMarkedCall);
+ bool CanTRETailMarkedCall = true;
+
+ // Find calls that can be marked tail.
+ AllocaCaptureTracker ACT;
+ for (Function::iterator BB = F.begin(), EE = F.end(); BB != EE; ++BB) {
+ for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ if (AllocaInst *AI = dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(I)) {
+ CanTRETailMarkedCall &= CanTRE(AI);
+ PointerMayBeCaptured(AI, &ACT);
+ // If any allocas are captured, exit.
+ if (ACT.Captured)
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
}
- /// FIXME: The code generator produces really bad code when an 'escaping
- /// alloca' is changed from being a static alloca to being a dynamic alloca.
- /// Until this is resolved, disable this transformation if that would ever
- /// happen. This bug is PR962.
- if (FunctionContainsEscapingAllocas)
- return false;
-
- // Second pass, change any tail calls to loops.
- for (Function::iterator BB = F.begin(), E = F.end(); BB != E; ++BB) {
- if (ReturnInst *Ret = dyn_cast<ReturnInst>(BB->getTerminator())) {
- bool Change = ProcessReturningBlock(Ret, OldEntry, TailCallsAreMarkedTail,
- ArgumentPHIs,CannotTCETailMarkedCall);
- if (!Change && BB->getFirstNonPHIOrDbg() == Ret)
- Change = FoldReturnAndProcessPred(BB, Ret, OldEntry,
- TailCallsAreMarkedTail, ArgumentPHIs,
- CannotTCETailMarkedCall);
- MadeChange |= Change;
+ // Second pass, change any tail recursive calls to loops.
+ //
+ // FIXME: The code generator produces really bad code when an 'escaping
+ // alloca' is changed from being a static alloca to being a dynamic alloca.
+ // Until this is resolved, disable this transformation if that would ever
+ // happen. This bug is PR962.
+ if (ACT.UsesAlloca.empty()) {
+ for (Function::iterator BB = F.begin(), E = F.end(); BB != E; ++BB) {
+ if (ReturnInst *Ret = dyn_cast<ReturnInst>(BB->getTerminator())) {
+ bool Change = ProcessReturningBlock(Ret, OldEntry, TailCallsAreMarkedTail,
+ ArgumentPHIs, !CanTRETailMarkedCall);
+ if (!Change && BB->getFirstNonPHIOrDbg() == Ret)
+ Change = FoldReturnAndProcessPred(BB, Ret, OldEntry,
+ TailCallsAreMarkedTail, ArgumentPHIs,
+ !CanTRETailMarkedCall);
+ MadeChange |= Change;
+ }
}
}
@@ -223,16 +236,24 @@ bool TailCallElim::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
}
}
- // Finally, if this function contains no non-escaping allocas, or calls
- // setjmp, mark all calls in the function as eligible for tail calls
- //(there is no stack memory for them to access).
- if (!FunctionContainsEscapingAllocas && !F.callsFunctionThatReturnsTwice())
- for (Function::iterator BB = F.begin(), E = F.end(); BB != E; ++BB)
- for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); I != E; ++I)
+ // At this point, we know that the function does not have any captured
+ // allocas. If additionally the function does not call setjmp, mark all calls
+ // in the function that do not access stack memory with the tail keyword. This
+ // implies ensuring that there does not exist any path from a call that takes
+ // in an alloca but does not capture it and the call which we wish to mark
+ // with "tail".
+ if (!F.callsFunctionThatReturnsTwice()) {
+ for (Function::iterator BB = F.begin(), E = F.end(); BB != E; ++BB) {
+ for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); I != E; ++I) {
if (CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(I)) {
- CI->setTailCall();
- MadeChange = true;
+ if (!ACT.UsesAlloca.count(CI)) {
+ CI->setTailCall();
+ MadeChange = true;
+ }
}
+ }
+ }
+ }
return MadeChange;
}
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-06-04 17:41:48 +0000