summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/CodeGen/AArch64/fcmp.ll
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test/CodeGen/AArch64/fcmp.ll')
-rw-r--r--test/CodeGen/AArch64/fcmp.ll81
1 files changed, 81 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/AArch64/fcmp.ll b/test/CodeGen/AArch64/fcmp.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d254e8c051
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/CodeGen/AArch64/fcmp.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+; RUN: llc -verify-machineinstrs < %s -march=aarch64 | FileCheck %s
+
+declare void @bar(i32)
+
+define void @test_float(float %a, float %b) {
+; CHECK: test_float:
+
+ %tst1 = fcmp oeq float %a, %b
+ br i1 %tst1, label %end, label %t2
+; CHECK: fcmp {{s[0-9]+}}, {{s[0-9]+}}
+; CHECK: b.eq .L
+
+t2:
+ %tst2 = fcmp une float %b, 0.0
+ br i1 %tst2, label %t3, label %end
+; CHECK: fcmp {{s[0-9]+}}, #0.0
+; CHECK: b.eq .L
+
+
+t3:
+; This test can't be implemented with just one A64 conditional
+; branch. LLVM converts "ordered and not equal" to "unordered or
+; equal" before instruction selection, which is what we currently
+; test. Obviously, other sequences are valid.
+ %tst3 = fcmp one float %a, %b
+ br i1 %tst3, label %t4, label %end
+; CHECK: fcmp {{s[0-9]+}}, {{s[0-9]+}}
+; CHECK-NEXT: b.eq .[[T4:LBB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: b.vs .[[T4]]
+t4:
+ %tst4 = fcmp uge float %a, -0.0
+ br i1 %tst4, label %t5, label %end
+; CHECK-NOT: fcmp {{s[0-9]+}}, #0.0
+; CHECK: b.mi .LBB
+
+t5:
+ call void @bar(i32 0)
+ ret void
+end:
+ ret void
+
+}
+
+define void @test_double(double %a, double %b) {
+; CHECK: test_double:
+
+ %tst1 = fcmp oeq double %a, %b
+ br i1 %tst1, label %end, label %t2
+; CHECK: fcmp {{d[0-9]+}}, {{d[0-9]+}}
+; CHECK: b.eq .L
+
+t2:
+ %tst2 = fcmp une double %b, 0.0
+ br i1 %tst2, label %t3, label %end
+; CHECK: fcmp {{d[0-9]+}}, #0.0
+; CHECK: b.eq .L
+
+
+t3:
+; This test can't be implemented with just one A64 conditional
+; branch. LLVM converts "ordered and not equal" to "unordered or
+; equal" before instruction selection, which is what we currently
+; test. Obviously, other sequences are valid.
+ %tst3 = fcmp one double %a, %b
+ br i1 %tst3, label %t4, label %end
+; CHECK: fcmp {{d[0-9]+}}, {{d[0-9]+}}
+; CHECK-NEXT: b.eq .[[T4:LBB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: b.vs .[[T4]]
+t4:
+ %tst4 = fcmp uge double %a, -0.0
+ br i1 %tst4, label %t5, label %end
+; CHECK-NOT: fcmp {{d[0-9]+}}, #0.0
+; CHECK: b.mi .LBB
+
+t5:
+ call void @bar(i32 0)
+ ret void
+end:
+ ret void
+
+}