summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/llvm/Transforms
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* [C++] Use 'nullptr'. Transforms edition.Craig Topper2014-04-25
| | | | git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207196 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Allow vectorization of bit intrinsics in BB Vectorizer.Karthik Bhat2014-04-25
| | | | | | | | This patch adds support for vectorization of bit intrinsics such as bswap,ctpop,ctlz,cttz. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207174 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [Modules] Make Support/Debug.h modular. This requires it to not changeChandler Carruth2014-04-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | behavior based on other files defining DEBUG_TYPE, which means it cannot define DEBUG_TYPE at all. This is actually better IMO as it forces folks to define relevant DEBUG_TYPEs for their files. However, it requires all files that currently use DEBUG(...) to define a DEBUG_TYPE if they don't already. I've updated all such files in LLVM and will do the same for other upstream projects. This still leaves one important change in how LLVM uses the DEBUG_TYPE macro going forward: we need to only define the macro *after* header files have been #include-ed. Previously, this wasn't possible because Debug.h required the macro to be pre-defined. This commit removes that. By defining DEBUG_TYPE after the includes two things are fixed: - Header files that need to provide a DEBUG_TYPE for some inline code can do so by defining the macro before their inline code and undef-ing it afterward so the macro does not escape. - We no longer have rampant ODR violations due to including headers with different DEBUG_TYPE definitions. This may be mostly an academic violation today, but with modules these types of violations are easy to check for and potentially very relevant. Where necessary to suppor headers with DEBUG_TYPE, I have moved the definitions below the includes in this commit. I plan to move the rest of the DEBUG_TYPE macros in LLVM in subsequent commits; this one is big enough. The comments in Debug.h, which were hilariously out of date already, have been updated to reflect the recommended practice going forward. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206822 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Add missing #include found by modules build.Richard Smith2014-04-20
| | | | git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206726 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* PMBuilder: Expose an option to disable tail callsDuncan P. N. Exon Smith2014-04-18
| | | | | | | | Adds API to allow frontends to disable tail calls in PassManagerBuilder. <rdar://problem/16050591> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206542 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [C++11] More 'nullptr' conversion. In some cases just using a boolean check ↵Craig Topper2014-04-15
| | | | | | instead of comparing to nullptr. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206252 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [C++11] More 'nullptr' conversion. In some cases just using a boolean check ↵Craig Topper2014-04-14
| | | | | | instead of comparing to nullptr. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206142 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* SLPVectorizer: Only vectorize intrinsics whose operands are widened equallyArnold Schwaighofer2014-04-09
| | | | | | | | | The vectorizer only knows how to vectorize intrinics by widening all operands by the same factor. Patch by Tyler Nowicki! git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205855 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Revert "Reapply "LTO: add API to set strategy for -internalize""Duncan P. N. Exon Smith2014-04-02
| | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit r199244. Conflicts: include/llvm-c/lto.h include/llvm/LTO/LTOCodeGenerator.h lib/LTO/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205471 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Move partial/runtime unrolling late in the pipelineHal Finkel2014-03-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The generic (concatenation) loop unroller is currently placed early in the standard optimization pipeline. This is a good place to perform full unrolling, but not the right place to perform partial/runtime unrolling. However, most targets don't enable partial/runtime unrolling, so this never mattered. However, even some x86 cores benefit from partial/runtime unrolling of very small loops, and follow-up commits will enable this. First, we need to move partial/runtime unrolling late in the optimization pipeline (importantly, this is after SLP and loop vectorization, as vectorization can drastically change the size of a loop), while keeping the full unrolling where it is now. This change does just that. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205264 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Remove LowerInvoke's obsolete "-enable-correct-eh-support" optionMark Seaborn2014-03-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This option caused LowerInvoke to generate code using SJLJ-based exception handling, but there is no code left that interprets the jmp_buf stack that the resulting code maintained (llvm.sjljeh.jblist). This option has been obsolete for a while, and replaced by SjLjEHPrepare. This leaves the default behaviour of LowerInvoke, which is to convert invokes to calls. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3136 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204388 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [msan] Origin tracking with history.Evgeniy Stepanov2014-03-18
| | | | | | | | | LLVM part of MSan implementation of advanced origin tracking, when we record not only creation point, but all locations where an uninitialized value was stored to memory, too. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204151 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Untabify.NAKAMURA Takumi2014-03-16
| | | | git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204020 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Move duplicated code into a helper function (exposed through overload).Eli Bendersky2014-03-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There's a bit of duplicated "magic" code in opt.cpp and Clang's CodeGen that computes the inliner threshold from opt level and size opt level. This patch moves the code to a function that lives alongside the inliner itself, providing a convenient overload to the inliner creation. A separate patch can be committed to Clang to use this once it's committed to LLVM. Standalone tools that use the inlining pass can also avoid duplicating this code and fearing it will go out of sync. Note: this patch also restructures the conditinal logic of the computation to be cleaner. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203669 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Cloning a function now also clones its debug metadata if ↵Alon Mishne2014-03-12
| | | | | | 'ModuleLevelChanges' is true. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [C++11] Add 'override' keyword to virtual methods that override their base ↵Craig Topper2014-03-05
| | | | | | class. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202953 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [Modules] Move CFG.h to the IR library as it defines graph traits overChandler Carruth2014-03-04
| | | | | | IR types. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202827 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [Modules] Move ValueMap to the IR library. While this class does notChandler Carruth2014-03-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | directly care about the Value class (it is templated so that the key can be any arbitrary Value subclass), it is in fact concretely tied to the Value class through the ValueHandle's CallbackVH interface which relies on the key type being some Value subclass to establish the value handle chain. Ironically, the unittest is already in the right library. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202824 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [Modules] Move ValueHandle into the IR library where Value itself lives.Chandler Carruth2014-03-04
| | | | | | | | | | | Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well. This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests. Mmmm, tasty layering. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202821 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [Modules] Move GetElementPtrTypeIterator into the IR library. As itsChandler Carruth2014-03-04
| | | | | | | | | name might indicate, it is an iterator over the types in an instruction in the IR.... You see where this is going. Another step of modularizing the support library. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202815 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Pass to emit DWARF path discriminators.Diego Novillo2014-03-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DWARF discriminators are used to distinguish multiple control flow paths on the same source location. When this happens, instructions across basic block boundaries will share the same debug location. This pass detects this situation and creates a new lexical scope to one of the two instructions. This lexical scope is a child scope of the original and contains a new discriminator value. This discriminator is then picked up from MCObjectStreamer::EmitDwarfLocDirective to be written on the object file. This fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18270. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202752 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [CodeGenPrepare] Move CodeGenPrepare into lib/CodeGen.Quentin Colombet2014-02-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | CodeGenPrepare uses extensively TargetLowering which is part of libLLVMCodeGen. This is a layer violation which would introduce eventually a dependence on CodeGen in ScalarOpts. Move CodeGenPrepare into libLLVMCodeGen to avoid that. Follow-up of <rdar://problem/15519855> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@201912 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Rename some member variables from TD to DL.Rafael Espindola2014-02-18
| | | | | | TargetData was renamed DataLayout back in r165242. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@201581 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Don't build DFSan functionality for Android.Stephen Hines2014-02-13
| | | | git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@201362 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [LPM] Fix PR18616 where the shifts to the loop pass manager to extractChandler Carruth2014-01-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | LCSSA from it caused a crasher with the LoopUnroll pass. This crasher is really nasty. We destroy LCSSA form in a suprising way. When unrolling a loop into an outer loop, we not only need to restore LCSSA form for the outer loop, but for all children of the outer loop. This is somewhat obvious in retrospect, but hey! While this seems pretty heavy-handed, it's not that bad. Fundamentally, we only do this when we unroll a loop, which is already a heavyweight operation. We're unrolling all of these hypothetical inner loops as well, so their size and complexity is already on the critical path. This is just adding another pass over them to re-canonicalize. I have a test case from PR18616 that is great for reproducing this, but pretty useless to check in as it relies on many 10s of nested empty loops that get unrolled and deleted in just the right order. =/ What's worse is that investigating this has exposed another source of failure that is likely to be even harder to test. I'll try to come up with test cases for these fixes, but I want to get the fixes into the tree first as they're causing crashes in the wild. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200273 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [LPM] Make LCSSA a utility with a FunctionPass that applies it to allChandler Carruth2014-01-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | the loops in a function, and teach LICM to work in the presance of LCSSA. Previously, LCSSA was a loop pass. That made passes requiring it also be loop passes and unable to depend on function analysis passes easily. It also caused outer loops to have a different "canonical" form from inner loops during analysis. Instead, we go into LCSSA form and preserve it through the loop pass manager run. Note that this has the same problem as LoopSimplify that prevents enabling its verification -- loop passes which run at the end of the loop pass manager and don't preserve these are valid, but the subsequent loop pass runs of outer loops that do preserve this pass trigger too much verification and fail because the inner loop no longer verifies. The other problem this exposed is that LICM was completely unable to handle LCSSA form. It didn't preserve it and it actually would give up on moving instructions in many cases when they were used by an LCSSA phi node. I've taught LICM to support detecting LCSSA-form PHI nodes and to hoist and sink around them. This may actually let LICM fire significantly more because we put everything into LCSSA form to rotate the loop before running LICM. =/ Now LICM should handle that fine and preserve it correctly. The down side is that LICM has to require LCSSA in order to preserve it. This is just a fact of life for LCSSA. It's entirely possible we should completely remove LCSSA from the optimizer. The test updates are essentially accomodating LCSSA phi nodes in the output of LICM, and the fact that we now completely sink every instruction in ashr-crash below the loop bodies prior to unrolling. With this change, LCSSA is computed only three times in the pass pipeline. One of them could be removed (and potentially a SCEV run and a separate LoopPassManager entirely!) if we had a LoopPass variant of InstCombine that ran InstCombine on the loop body but refused to combine away LCSSA PHI nodes. Currently, this also prevents loop unrolling from being in the same loop pass manager is rotate, LICM, and unswitch. There is one thing that I *really* don't like -- preserving LCSSA in LICM is quite expensive. We end up having to re-run LCSSA twice for some loops after LICM runs because LICM can undo LCSSA both in the current loop and the parent loop. I don't really see good solutions to this other than to completely move away from LCSSA and using tools like SSAUpdater instead. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200067 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Revert "Revert "Add Constant Hoisting Pass" (r200034)"Juergen Ributzka2014-01-25
| | | | | | | This reverts commit r200058 and adds the using directive for ARMTargetTransformInfo to silence two g++ overload warnings. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200062 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Revert "Add Constant Hoisting Pass" (r200034)Hans Wennborg2014-01-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit caused -Woverloaded-virtual warnings. The two new TargetTransformInfo::getIntImmCost functions were only added to the superclass, and to the X86 subclass. The other targets were not updated, and the warning highlighted this by pointing out that e.g. ARMTTI::getIntImmCost was hiding the two new getIntImmCost variants. We could pacify the warning by adding "using TargetTransformInfo::getIntImmCost" to the various subclasses, or turning it off, but I suspect that it's wrong to leave the functions unimplemnted in those targets. The default implementations return TCC_Free, which I don't think is right e.g. for ARM. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200058 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Add Constant Hoisting PassJuergen Ributzka2014-01-24
| | | | | | | | Retry commit r200022 with a fix for the build bot errors. Constant expressions have (unlike instructions) module scope use lists and therefore may have users in different functions. The fix is to simply ignore these out-of-function uses. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200034 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Revert "Add Constant Hoisting Pass"Juergen Ributzka2014-01-24
| | | | | | This reverts commit r200022 to unbreak the build bots. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200024 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Add Constant Hoisting PassJuergen Ributzka2014-01-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This pass identifies expensive constants to hoist and coalesces them to better prepare it for SelectionDAG-based code generation. This works around the limitations of the basic-block-at-a-time approach. First it scans all instructions for integer constants and calculates its cost. If the constant can be folded into the instruction (the cost is TCC_Free) or the cost is just a simple operation (TCC_BASIC), then we don't consider it expensive and leave it alone. This is the default behavior and the default implementation of getIntImmCost will always return TCC_Free. If the cost is more than TCC_BASIC, then the integer constant can't be folded into the instruction and it might be beneficial to hoist the constant. Similar constants are coalesced to reduce register pressure and materialization code. When a constant is hoisted, it is also hidden behind a bitcast to force it to be live-out of the basic block. Otherwise the constant would be just duplicated and each basic block would have its own copy in the SelectionDAG. The SelectionDAG recognizes such constants as opaque and doesn't perform certain transformations on them, which would create a new expensive constant. This optimization is only applied to integer constants in instructions and simple (this means not nested) constant cast experessions. For example: %0 = load i64* inttoptr (i64 big_constant to i64*) Reviewed by Eric git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200022 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Fix known typosAlp Toker2014-01-24
| | | | | | | Sweep the codebase for common typos. Includes some changes to visible function names that were misspelt. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200018 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [LPM] Make LoopSimplify no longer a LoopPass and instead both a utilityChandler Carruth2014-01-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | function and a FunctionPass. This has many benefits. The motivating use case was to be able to compute function analysis passes *after* running LoopSimplify (to avoid invalidating them) and then to run other passes which require LoopSimplify. Specifically passes like unrolling and vectorization are critical to wire up to BranchProbabilityInfo and BlockFrequencyInfo so that they can be profile aware. For the LoopVectorize pass the only things in the way are LoopSimplify and LCSSA. This fixes LoopSimplify and LCSSA is next on my list. There are also a bunch of other benefits of doing this: - It is now very feasible to make more passes *preserve* LoopSimplify because they can simply run it after changing a loop. Because subsequence passes can assume LoopSimplify is preserved we can reduce the runs of this pass to the times when we actually mutate a loop structure. - The new pass manager should be able to more easily support loop passes factored in this way. - We can at long, long last observe that LoopSimplify is preserved across SCEV. This *halves* the number of times we run LoopSimplify!!! Now, getting here wasn't trivial. First off, the interfaces used by LoopSimplify are all over the map regarding how analysis are updated. We end up with weird "pass" parameters as a consequence. I'll try to clean at least some of this up later -- I'll have to have it all clean for the new pass manager. Next up I discovered a really frustrating bug. LoopUnroll *claims* to preserve LoopSimplify. That's actually a lie. But the way the LoopPassManager ends up running the passes, it always ran LoopSimplify on the unrolled-into loop, rectifying this oversight before any verification could kick in and point out that in fact nothing was preserved. So I've added code to the unroller to *actually* simplify the surrounding loop when it succeeds at unrolling. The only functional change in the test suite is that we now catch a case that was previously missed because SCEV and other loop transforms see their containing loops as simplified and thus don't miss some opportunities. One test case has been converted to check that we catch this case rather than checking that we miss it but at least don't get the wrong answer. Note that I have #if-ed out all of the verification logic in LoopSimplify! This is a temporary workaround while extracting these bits from the LoopPassManager. Currently, there is no way to have a pass in the LoopPassManager which preserves LoopSimplify along with one which does not. The LPM will try to verify on each loop in the nest that LoopSimplify holds but the now-Function-pass cannot distinguish what loop is being verified and so must try to verify all of them. The inner most loop is clearly no longer simplified as there is a pass which didn't even *attempt* to preserve it. =/ Once I get LCSSA out (and maybe LoopVectorize and some other fixes) I'll be able to re-enable this check and catch any places where we are still failing to preserve LoopSimplify. If this causes problems I can back this out and try to commit *all* of this at once, but so far this seems to work and allow much more incremental progress. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199884 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [asan] Remove -fsanitize-address-zero-base-shadow command lineEvgeniy Stepanov2014-01-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | flag from clang, and disable zero-base shadow support on all platforms where it is not the default behavior. - It is completely unused, as far as we know. - It is ABI-incompatible with non-zero-base shadow, which means all objects in a process must be built with the same setting. Failing to do so results in a segmentation fault at runtime. - It introduces a backward dependency of compiler-rt on user code, which is uncommon and complicates testing. This is the LLVM part of a larger change. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199371 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Reapply "LTO: add API to set strategy for -internalize"Duncan P. N. Exon Smith2014-01-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Reapply r199191, reverted in r199197 because it carelessly broke Other/link-opts.ll. The problem was that calling createInternalizePass("main") would select createInternalizePass(bool("main")) instead of createInternalizePass(ArrayRef<const char *>("main")). This commit fixes the bug. The original commit message follows. Add API to LTOCodeGenerator to specify a strategy for the -internalize pass. This is a new attempt at Bill's change in r185882, which he reverted in r188029 due to problems with the gold linker. This puts the onus on the linker to decide whether (and what) to internalize. In particular, running internalize before outputting an object file may change a 'weak' symbol into an internal one, even though that symbol could be needed by an external object file --- e.g., with arclite. This patch enables three strategies: - LTO_INTERNALIZE_FULL: the default (and the old behaviour). - LTO_INTERNALIZE_NONE: skip -internalize. - LTO_INTERNALIZE_HIDDEN: only -internalize symbols with hidden visibility. LTO_INTERNALIZE_FULL should be used when linking an executable. Outputting an object file (e.g., via ld -r) is more complicated, and depends on whether hidden symbols should be internalized. E.g., for ld -r, LTO_INTERNALIZE_NONE can be used when -keep_private_externs, and LTO_INTERNALIZE_HIDDEN can be used otherwise. However, LTO_INTERNALIZE_FULL is inappropriate, since the output object file will eventually need to link with others. lto_codegen_set_internalize_strategy() sets the strategy for subsequent calls to lto_codegen_write_merged_modules() and lto_codegen_compile*(). <rdar://problem/14334895> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199244 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Revert r199191, "LTO: add API to set strategy for -internalize"NAKAMURA Takumi2014-01-14
| | | | | | Please update also Other/link-opts.ll, in next time. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199197 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* LTO: add API to set strategy for -internalizeDuncan P. N. Exon Smith2014-01-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add API to LTOCodeGenerator to specify a strategy for the -internalize pass. This is a new attempt at Bill's change in r185882, which he reverted in r188029 due to problems with the gold linker. This puts the onus on the linker to decide whether (and what) to internalize. In particular, running internalize before outputting an object file may change a 'weak' symbol into an internal one, even though that symbol could be needed by an external object file --- e.g., with arclite. This patch enables three strategies: - LTO_INTERNALIZE_FULL: the default (and the old behaviour). - LTO_INTERNALIZE_NONE: skip -internalize. - LTO_INTERNALIZE_HIDDEN: only -internalize symbols with hidden visibility. LTO_INTERNALIZE_FULL should be used when linking an executable. Outputting an object file (e.g., via ld -r) is more complicated, and depends on whether hidden symbols should be internalized. E.g., for ld -r, LTO_INTERNALIZE_NONE can be used when -keep_private_externs, and LTO_INTERNALIZE_HIDDEN can be used otherwise. However, LTO_INTERNALIZE_FULL is inappropriate, since the output object file will eventually need to link with others. lto_codegen_set_internalize_strategy() sets the strategy for subsequent calls to lto_codegen_write_merged_modules() and lto_codegen_compile*(). <rdar://problem/14334895> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199191 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Add support to indvars for optimizing sadd.with.overflow.Andrew Trick2013-12-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Split sadd.with.overflow into add + sadd.with.overflow to allow analysis and optimization. This should ideally be done after InstCombine, which can perform code motion (eventually indvars should run after all canonical instcombines). We want ISEL to recombine the add and the check, at least on x86. This is currently under an option for reducing live induction variables: -liv-reduce. The next step is reducing liveness of IVs that are live out of the overflow check paths. Once the related optimizations are fully developed, reviewed and tested, I do expect this to become default. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@197926 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [asan] don't unpoison redzones on function exit in use-after-return mode.Kostya Serebryany2013-12-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Before this change the instrumented code before Ret instructions looked like: <Unpoison Frame Redzones> if (Frame != OriginalFrame) // I.e. Frame is fake <Poison Complete Frame> Now the instrumented code looks like: if (Frame != OriginalFrame) // I.e. Frame is fake <Poison Complete Frame> else <Unpoison Frame Redzones> Reviewers: eugenis Reviewed By: eugenis CC: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2458 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@197907 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Add an explicit insert point argument to SplitBlockAndInsertIfThen.Evgeniy Stepanov2013-12-19
| | | | | | | | | Currently SplitBlockAndInsertIfThen requires that branch condition is an Instruction itself, which is very inconvenient, because it is sometimes an Operator, or even a Constant. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@197677 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Fix missing C++ mode commentMatt Arsenault2013-12-19
| | | | git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@197658 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Enable double to float shrinking optimizations for binary functions like ↵Yi Jiang2013-12-16
| | | | | | 'fmin/fmax'. Fix radar:15283121 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@197434 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Fix a narrowing warning due to a type mismatch (size_t vs uint64).Kaelyn Uhrain2013-12-06
| | | | | | | | lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp:1405:36: error: non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'uint64_t' (aka 'unsigned long long') to 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned int') in initializer list [-Wc++11-narrowing] getAllocaSizeInBytes(AI), ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196623 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* [asan] rewrite asan's stack frame layoutKostya Serebryany2013-12-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Rewrite asan's stack frame layout. First, most of the stack layout logic is moved into a separte file to make it more testable and (potentially) useful for other projects. Second, make the frames more compact by using adaptive redzones (smaller for small objects, larger for large objects). Third, try to minimized gaps due to large alignments (this is hypothetical since today we don't see many stack vars aligned by more than 32). The frames indeed become more compact, but I'll still need to run more benchmarks before committing, but I am sking for review now to get early feedback. This change will be accompanied by a trivial change in compiler-rt tests to match the new frame sizes. Reviewers: samsonov, dvyukov Reviewed By: samsonov CC: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2324 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196568 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Add #pragma vectorize enable/disable to LLVMRenato Golin2013-12-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The intended behaviour is to force vectorization on the presence of the flag (either turn on or off), and to continue the behaviour as expected in its absence. Tests were added to make sure the all cases are covered in opt. No tests were added in other tools with the assumption that they should use the PassManagerBuilder in the same way. This patch also removes the outdated -late-vectorize flag, which was on by default and not helping much. The pragma metadata is being attached to the same place as other loop metadata, but nothing forbids one from attaching it to a function (to enable #pragma optimize) or basic blocks (to hint the basic-block vectorizers), etc. The logic should be the same all around. Patches to Clang to produce the metadata will be produced after the initial implementation is agreed upon and committed. Patches to other vectorizers (such as SLP and BB) will be added once we're happy with the pass manager changes. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196537 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Add forgotten header guardsAlexey Samsonov2013-12-05
| | | | git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196500 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Add a Scalarizer pass.Richard Sandiford2013-11-22
| | | | git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195471 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Add support for software expansion of 64-bit integer division instructions.Michael Ilseman2013-11-19
| | | | | | | | Patch by Dmitri Shtilman! git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195116 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Add a loop rerolling flag to the PassManagerBuilderHal Finkel2013-11-17
| | | | | | | | | This adds a boolean member variable to the PassManagerBuilder to control loop rerolling (just like we have for unrolling and the various vectorization options). This is necessary for control by the frontend. Loop rerolling remains disabled by default at all optimization levels. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194966 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Add a loop rerolling passHal Finkel2013-11-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This adds a loop rerolling pass: the opposite of (partial) loop unrolling. The transformation aims to take loops like this: for (int i = 0; i < 3200; i += 5) { a[i] += alpha * b[i]; a[i + 1] += alpha * b[i + 1]; a[i + 2] += alpha * b[i + 2]; a[i + 3] += alpha * b[i + 3]; a[i + 4] += alpha * b[i + 4]; } and turn them into this: for (int i = 0; i < 3200; ++i) { a[i] += alpha * b[i]; } and loops like this: for (int i = 0; i < 500; ++i) { x[3*i] = foo(0); x[3*i+1] = foo(0); x[3*i+2] = foo(0); } and turn them into this: for (int i = 0; i < 1500; ++i) { x[i] = foo(0); } There are two motivations for this transformation: 1. Code-size reduction (especially relevant, obviously, when compiling for code size). 2. Providing greater choice to the loop vectorizer (and generic unroller) to choose the unrolling factor (and a better ability to vectorize). The loop vectorizer can take vector lengths and register pressure into account when choosing an unrolling factor, for example, and a pre-unrolled loop limits that choice. This is especially problematic if the manual unrolling was optimized for a machine different from the current target. The current implementation is limited to single basic-block loops only. The rerolling recognition should work regardless of how the loop iterations are intermixed within the loop body (subject to dependency and side-effect constraints), but the significant restriction is that the order of the instructions in each iteration must be identical. This seems sufficient to capture all current use cases. This pass is not currently enabled by default at any optimization level. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194939 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8