Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | |
---|---|---|---|
* | [weak vtables] Remove a bunch of weak vtables | Juergen Ributzka | 2013-11-19 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to a single object file. The memory leaks in this version have been fixed. Thanks Alexey for pointing them out. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068 Reviewed by Andy git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195064 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 | ||
* | Revert r194865 and r194874. | Alexey Samsonov | 2013-11-18 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | This change is incorrect. If you delete virtual destructor of both a base class and a subclass, then the following code: Base *foo = new Child(); delete foo; will not cause the destructor for members of Child class. As a result, I observe plently of memory leaks. Notable examples I investigated are: ObjectBuffer and ObjectBufferStream, AttributeImpl and StringSAttributeImpl. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194997 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 | ||
* | [weak vtables] Remove a bunch of weak vtables | Juergen Ributzka | 2013-11-15 |
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to a single object file. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068 Reviewed by Andy git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194865 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 |