summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/CodeGen/ARM/2012-08-30-select.ll
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* MachineSink: Fix and tweak critical-edge breaking heuristic.Will Dietz2013-10-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Per original comment, the intention of this loop is to go ahead and break the critical edge (in order to sink this instruction) if there's reason to believe doing so might "unblock" the sinking of additional instructions that define registers used by this one. The idea is that if we have a few instructions to sink "together" breaking the edge might be worthwhile. This commit makes a few small changes to help better realize this goal: First, modify the loop to ignore registers defined by this instruction. We don't sink definitions of physical registers, and sinking an SSA definition isn't going to unblock an upstream instruction. Second, ignore uses of physical registers. Instructions that define physical registers are rejected for sinking, and so moving this one won't enable moving any defining instructions. As an added bonus, while virtual register use-def chains are generally small due to SSA goodness, iteration over the uses and definitions (used by hasOneNonDBGUse) for physical registers like EFLAGS can be rather expensive in practice. (This is the original reason for looking at this) Finally, to keep things simple continue to only consider this trick for registers that have a single use (via hasOneNonDBGUse), but to avoid spuriously breaking critical edges only do so if the definition resides in the same MBB and therefore this one directly blocks it from being sunk as well. If sinking them together is meant to be, let the iterative nature of this pass sink the definition into this block first. Update tests to accomodate this change, add new testcase where sinking avoids pipeline stalls. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@192608 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Update to more CodeGen tests to use CHECK-LABEL for labels corresponding to ↵Stephen Lin2013-07-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | function definitions for more informative error messages. No functionality change. All changes were made by the following bash script: find test/CodeGen -name "*.ll" | \ while read NAME; do echo "$NAME" grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc.*debug" $NAME && continue grep -q "^; *RUN:.*llvm-objdump" $NAME && continue grep -q "^; *RUN: *opt.*" $NAME && continue TEMP=`mktemp -t temp` cp $NAME $TEMP sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \ while read FUNC; do sed -i '' "s/;\([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\):\( *\)$FUNC[:]* *\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3$FUNC:/g" $TEMP done sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-LABEL-LABEL:/;\1-LABEL:/" $TEMP sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-NEXT-LABEL:/;\1-NEXT:/" $TEMP sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-NOT-LABEL:/;\1-NOT:/" $TEMP sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-DAG-LABEL:/;\1-DAG:/" $TEMP mv $TEMP $NAME done This script catches a superset of the cases caught by the script associated with commit r186280. It initially found some false positives due to unusual constructs in a minority of tests; all such cases were disambiguated first in commit r186621. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186624 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Not all targets have efficient ISel code generation for select instructions.Nadav Rotem2012-09-02
| | | | | | | | | | | For example, the ARM target does not have efficient ISel handling for vector selects with scalar conditions. This patch adds a TLI hook which allows the different targets to report which selects are supported well and which selects should be converted to CF duting codegen prepare. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163093 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Generate better select code by allowing the target to use scalar select, and ↵Nadav Rotem2012-09-02
| | | | | | not sign-extend. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163086 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Currently targets that do not support selects with scalar conditions and ↵Nadav Rotem2012-08-30
vector operands - scalarize the code. ARM is such a target because it does not support CMOV of vectors. To implement this efficientlyi, we broadcast the condition bit and use a sequence of NAND-OR to select between the two operands. This is the same sequence we use for targets that don't have vector BLENDs (like SSE2). rdar://12201387 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@162926 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8