From 099bfe68a47ebb4f764d009cc2de572e6bc5bc96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eli Bendersky Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:37:58 +0000 Subject: Some sphinx-ing and consistency fixes git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@168380 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- docs/TableGenFundamentals.rst | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/TableGenFundamentals.rst') diff --git a/docs/TableGenFundamentals.rst b/docs/TableGenFundamentals.rst index bfb2618998..356b7d208e 100644 --- a/docs/TableGenFundamentals.rst +++ b/docs/TableGenFundamentals.rst @@ -120,16 +120,16 @@ this (at the time of this writing): } ... -This definition corresponds to a 32-bit register-register add instruction in the -X86. The string after the '``def``' string indicates the name of the -record---"``ADD32rr``" in this case---and the comment at the end of the line -indicates the superclasses of the definition. The body of the record contains -all of the data that TableGen assembled for the record, indicating that the -instruction is part of the "X86" namespace, the pattern indicating how the the -instruction should be emitted into the assembly file, that it is a two-address -instruction, has a particular encoding, etc. The contents and semantics of the -information in the record is specific to the needs of the X86 backend, and is -only shown as an example. +This definition corresponds to the 32-bit register-register ``add`` instruction +of the the x86 architecture. ``def ADD32rr`` defines a record named +``ADD32rr``, and the comment at the end of the line indicates the superclasses +of the definition. The body of the record contains all of the data that +TableGen assembled for the record, indicating that the instruction is part of +the "X86" namespace, the pattern indicating how the the instruction should be +emitted into the assembly file, that it is a two-address instruction, has a +particular encoding, etc. The contents and semantics of the information in the +record are specific to the needs of the X86 backend, and are only shown as an +example. As you can see, a lot of information is needed for every instruction supported by the code generator, and specifying it all manually would be unmaintainable, @@ -152,13 +152,12 @@ factor out the common features that instructions of its class share. A key feature of TableGen is that it allows the end-user to define the abstractions they prefer to use when describing their information. -Each def record has a special entry called "``NAME``." This is the name of the -def ("``ADD32rr``" above). In the general case def names can be formed from -various kinds of string processing expressions and ``NAME`` resolves to the +Each ``def`` record has a special entry called "NAME". This is the name of the +record ("``ADD32rr``" above). In the general case ``def`` names can be formed +from various kinds of string processing expressions and ``NAME`` resolves to the final value obtained after resolving all of those expressions. The user may -refer to ``NAME`` anywhere she desires to use the ultimate name of the def. -``NAME`` should not be defined anywhere else in user code to avoid conflict -problems. +refer to ``NAME`` anywhere she desires to use the ultimate name of the ``def``. +``NAME`` should not be defined anywhere else in user code to avoid conflicts. Running TableGen ---------------- -- cgit v1.2.3