summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>2012-08-07 17:30:46 +0000
committerRafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>2012-08-07 17:30:46 +0000
commit702bcce747cd3fd89049b16d37c9c88952b5af81 (patch)
treed1d8133d0c32f722e356250ec8e8f555ba61de92
parent8da94ad6e0947690201c543da556ec0396ad9912 (diff)
downloadllvm-702bcce747cd3fd89049b16d37c9c88952b5af81.tar.gz
llvm-702bcce747cd3fd89049b16d37c9c88952b5af81.tar.bz2
llvm-702bcce747cd3fd89049b16d37c9c88952b5af81.tar.xz
The dominance computation already has logic for computing if an edge dominates
a use or a BB, but it is inline in the handling of the invoke instruction. This patch refactors it so that it can be used in other cases. For example, in define i32 @f(i32 %x) { bb0: %cmp = icmp eq i32 %x, 0 br i1 %cmp, label %bb2, label %bb1 bb1: br label %bb2 bb2: %cond = phi i32 [ %x, %bb0 ], [ 0, %bb1 ] %foo = add i32 %cond, %x ret i32 %foo } GVN should be able to replace %x with 0 in any use that is dominated by the true edge out of bb0. In the above example the only such use is the one in the phi. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@161429 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--include/llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h16
-rw-r--r--lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp67
2 files changed, 56 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/include/llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h b/include/llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h
index 45be59b974..25fb363ad4 100644
--- a/include/llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h
+++ b/include/llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h
@@ -705,6 +705,20 @@ DominatorTreeBase<NodeT>::properlyDominates(const NodeT *A, const NodeT *B) {
EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION(class DominatorTreeBase<BasicBlock>);
+class BasicBlockEdge {
+ const BasicBlock *Start;
+ const BasicBlock *End;
+public:
+ BasicBlockEdge(const BasicBlock *Start_, const BasicBlock *End_) :
+ Start(Start_), End(End_) { }
+ const BasicBlock *getStart() const {
+ return Start;
+ }
+ const BasicBlock *getEnd() const {
+ return End;
+ }
+};
+
//===-------------------------------------
/// DominatorTree Class - Concrete subclass of DominatorTreeBase that is used to
/// compute a normal dominator tree.
@@ -778,6 +792,8 @@ public:
bool dominates(const Instruction *Def, const Use &U) const;
bool dominates(const Instruction *Def, const Instruction *User) const;
bool dominates(const Instruction *Def, const BasicBlock *BB) const;
+ bool dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE, const Use &U) const;
+ bool dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE, const BasicBlock *BB) const;
bool properlyDominates(const DomTreeNode *A, const DomTreeNode *B) const {
return DT->properlyDominates(A, B);
diff --git a/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp b/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp
index 219e6315cf..dcf0b43be2 100644
--- a/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp
+++ b/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp
@@ -142,12 +142,22 @@ bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def,
// Invoke results are only usable in the normal destination, not in the
// exceptional destination.
BasicBlock *NormalDest = II->getNormalDest();
- if (!dominates(NormalDest, UseBB))
+ BasicBlockEdge E(DefBB, NormalDest);
+ return dominates(E, UseBB);
+}
+
+bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE,
+ const BasicBlock *UseBB) const {
+ // If the BB the edge ends in doesn't dominate the use BB, then the
+ // edge also doesn't.
+ const BasicBlock *Start = BBE.getStart();
+ const BasicBlock *End = BBE.getEnd();
+ if (!dominates(End, UseBB))
return false;
- // Simple case: if the normal destination has a single predecessor, the
- // fact that it dominates the use block implies that we also do.
- if (NormalDest->getSinglePredecessor())
+ // Simple case: if the end BB has a single predecessor, the fact that it
+ // dominates the use block implies that the edge also does.
+ if (End->getSinglePredecessor())
return true;
// The normal edge from the invoke is critical. Conceptually, what we would
@@ -170,29 +180,40 @@ bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def,
// trivially dominates itself, so we only have to find if it dominates the
// other predecessors. Since the only way out of X is via NormalDest, X can
// only properly dominate a node if NormalDest dominates that node too.
- for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(NormalDest),
- E = pred_end(NormalDest); PI != E; ++PI) {
+ for (const_pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(End), E = pred_end(End);
+ PI != E; ++PI) {
const BasicBlock *BB = *PI;
- if (BB == DefBB)
- continue;
-
- if (!DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB))
+ if (BB == Start)
continue;
- if (!dominates(NormalDest, BB))
+ if (!dominates(End, BB))
return false;
}
return true;
}
-bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def,
+bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE,
const Use &U) const {
- Instruction *UserInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
+ Instruction *UserInst = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
+ // A PHI in the end of the edge is dominated by it.
+ PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(UserInst);
+ if (PN && PN->getParent() == BBE.getEnd() &&
+ PN->getIncomingBlock(U) == BBE.getStart())
+ return true;
- // Instructions do not dominate non-instructions.
- if (!UserInst)
- return false;
+ // Otherwise use the edge-dominates-block query, which
+ // handles the crazy critical edge cases properly.
+ const BasicBlock *UseBB;
+ if (PN)
+ UseBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(U);
+ else
+ UseBB = UserInst->getParent();
+ return dominates(BBE, UseBB);
+}
+bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def,
+ const Use &U) const {
+ Instruction *UserInst = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
const BasicBlock *DefBB = Def->getParent();
// Determine the block in which the use happens. PHI nodes use
@@ -218,17 +239,9 @@ bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def,
// their own block, except possibly a phi, so we don't need to
// walk the block in any case.
if (const InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(Def)) {
- // A PHI in the normal successor using the invoke's return value is
- // dominated by the invoke's return value.
- if (isa<PHINode>(UserInst) &&
- UserInst->getParent() == II->getNormalDest() &&
- cast<PHINode>(UserInst)->getIncomingBlock(U) == DefBB)
- return true;
-
- // Otherwise use the instruction-dominates-block query, which
- // handles the crazy case of an invoke with a critical edge
- // properly.
- return dominates(Def, UseBB);
+ BasicBlock *NormalDest = II->getNormalDest();
+ BasicBlockEdge E(DefBB, NormalDest);
+ return dominates(E, U);
}
// If the def and use are in different blocks, do a simple CFG dominator