summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>2007-08-13 20:03:06 +0000
committerDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>2007-08-13 20:03:06 +0000
commitbadb2d23d1042a991b8c6e31ff19ffd3f6712570 (patch)
treee1d981a0b294666f0f96b3e255a359a904b66abd
parenta45d9a15ba45eedc55b7b8cad292afbd4cb57cba (diff)
downloadllvm-badb2d23d1042a991b8c6e31ff19ffd3f6712570.tar.gz
llvm-badb2d23d1042a991b8c6e31ff19ffd3f6712570.tar.bz2
llvm-badb2d23d1042a991b8c6e31ff19ffd3f6712570.tar.xz
When x86 addresses matching exceeds its recursion limit, check to
see if the base register is already occupied before assuming it can be used. This fixes bogus code generation in the accompanying testcase. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@41049 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp18
-rw-r--r--test/CodeGen/X86/lea-recursion.ll47
2 files changed, 59 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp
index f0331b83a1..812d2ecbd2 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp
@@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ namespace {
bool MatchAddress(SDOperand N, X86ISelAddressMode &AM,
bool isRoot = true, unsigned Depth = 0);
+ bool MatchAddressBase(SDOperand N, X86ISelAddressMode &AM,
+ bool isRoot, unsigned Depth);
bool SelectAddr(SDOperand Op, SDOperand N, SDOperand &Base,
SDOperand &Scale, SDOperand &Index, SDOperand &Disp);
bool SelectLEAAddr(SDOperand Op, SDOperand N, SDOperand &Base,
@@ -572,12 +574,9 @@ void X86DAGToDAGISel::EmitFunctionEntryCode(Function &Fn, MachineFunction &MF) {
/// addressing mode
bool X86DAGToDAGISel::MatchAddress(SDOperand N, X86ISelAddressMode &AM,
bool isRoot, unsigned Depth) {
- if (Depth > 5) {
- // Default, generate it as a register.
- AM.BaseType = X86ISelAddressMode::RegBase;
- AM.Base.Reg = N;
- return false;
- }
+ // Limit recursion.
+ if (Depth > 5)
+ return MatchAddressBase(N, AM, isRoot, Depth);
// RIP relative addressing: %rip + 32-bit displacement!
if (AM.isRIPRel) {
@@ -763,6 +762,13 @@ bool X86DAGToDAGISel::MatchAddress(SDOperand N, X86ISelAddressMode &AM,
break;
}
+ return MatchAddressBase(N, AM, isRoot, Depth);
+}
+
+/// MatchAddressBase - Helper for MatchAddress. Add the specified node to the
+/// specified addressing mode without any further recursion.
+bool X86DAGToDAGISel::MatchAddressBase(SDOperand N, X86ISelAddressMode &AM,
+ bool isRoot, unsigned Depth) {
// Is the base register already occupied?
if (AM.BaseType != X86ISelAddressMode::RegBase || AM.Base.Reg.Val) {
// If so, check to see if the scale index register is set.
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/X86/lea-recursion.ll b/test/CodeGen/X86/lea-recursion.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ca7b3674d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/CodeGen/X86/lea-recursion.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | grep lea | wc -l | grep 12
+
+; This testcase was written to demonstrate an instruction-selection problem,
+; however it also happens to expose a limitation in the DAGCombiner's
+; expression reassociation which causes it to miss opportunities for
+; constant folding due to the intermediate adds having multiple uses.
+; The Reassociate pass has similar limitations. If these limitations are
+; fixed, the test commands above will need to be updated to expect fewer
+; lea instructions.
+
+@g0 = weak global [1000 x i32] zeroinitializer, align 32 ; <[1000 x i32]*> [#uses=8]
+@g1 = weak global [1000 x i32] zeroinitializer, align 32 ; <[1000 x i32]*> [#uses=7]
+
+define void @foo() {
+entry:
+ %tmp4 = load i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g0, i32 0, i32 0) ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp8 = load i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g1, i32 0, i32 0) ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp9 = add i32 %tmp4, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp10 = add i32 %tmp9, %tmp8 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ store i32 %tmp10, i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g0, i32 0, i32 1)
+ %tmp8.1 = load i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g1, i32 0, i32 1) ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp9.1 = add i32 %tmp10, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp10.1 = add i32 %tmp9.1, %tmp8.1 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ store i32 %tmp10.1, i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g0, i32 0, i32 2)
+ %tmp8.2 = load i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g1, i32 0, i32 2) ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp9.2 = add i32 %tmp10.1, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp10.2 = add i32 %tmp9.2, %tmp8.2 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ store i32 %tmp10.2, i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g0, i32 0, i32 3)
+ %tmp8.3 = load i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g1, i32 0, i32 3) ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp9.3 = add i32 %tmp10.2, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp10.3 = add i32 %tmp9.3, %tmp8.3 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ store i32 %tmp10.3, i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g0, i32 0, i32 4)
+ %tmp8.4 = load i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g1, i32 0, i32 4) ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp9.4 = add i32 %tmp10.3, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp10.4 = add i32 %tmp9.4, %tmp8.4 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ store i32 %tmp10.4, i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g0, i32 0, i32 5)
+ %tmp8.5 = load i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g1, i32 0, i32 5) ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp9.5 = add i32 %tmp10.4, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp10.5 = add i32 %tmp9.5, %tmp8.5 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ store i32 %tmp10.5, i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g0, i32 0, i32 6)
+ %tmp8.6 = load i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g1, i32 0, i32 6) ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp9.6 = add i32 %tmp10.5, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp10.6 = add i32 %tmp9.6, %tmp8.6 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ store i32 %tmp10.6, i32* getelementptr ([1000 x i32]* @g0, i32 0, i32 7)
+ ret void
+}
+