summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Christopher <echristo@gmail.com>2014-06-06 23:26:43 +0000
committerEric Christopher <echristo@gmail.com>2014-06-06 23:26:43 +0000
commitdf2f80d90903477ee33a6e53e90c12475d1dfdc3 (patch)
tree80ac6c6fc6cc6baf06e06795f76f2a95d01020d2
parent6c862ed02b5ca7ca16ab1e5fef3353902cd27209 (diff)
downloadllvm-df2f80d90903477ee33a6e53e90c12475d1dfdc3.tar.gz
llvm-df2f80d90903477ee33a6e53e90c12475d1dfdc3.tar.bz2
llvm-df2f80d90903477ee33a6e53e90c12475d1dfdc3.tar.xz
Remove all local variables from X86SelectionDAGInfo, the DAG has
all of the ones we were stashing away on startup. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210385 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp54
-rw-r--r--lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.h8
-rw-r--r--lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp2
3 files changed, 29 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp
index 058da847be..b6ecdf8ecf 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp
@@ -11,21 +11,23 @@
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-#include "X86TargetMachine.h"
+#include "X86InstrInfo.h"
+#include "X86ISelLowering.h"
+#include "X86RegisterInfo.h"
+#include "X86Subtarget.h"
+#include "X86SelectionDAGInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAG.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DerivedTypes.h"
+#include "llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h"
+
using namespace llvm;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "x86-selectiondag-info"
-X86SelectionDAGInfo::X86SelectionDAGInfo(const X86TargetMachine &TM) :
- TargetSelectionDAGInfo(TM.getDataLayout()),
- Subtarget(&TM.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>()),
- TLI(*TM.getTargetLowering()) {
-}
+X86SelectionDAGInfo::X86SelectionDAGInfo(const DataLayout &DL)
+ : TargetSelectionDAGInfo(&DL) {}
-X86SelectionDAGInfo::~X86SelectionDAGInfo() {
-}
+X86SelectionDAGInfo::~X86SelectionDAGInfo() {}
SDValue
X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl,
@@ -35,6 +37,7 @@ X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl,
bool isVolatile,
MachinePointerInfo DstPtrInfo) const {
ConstantSDNode *ConstantSize = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Size);
+ const X86Subtarget &Subtarget = DAG.getTarget().getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>();
// If to a segment-relative address space, use the default lowering.
if (DstPtrInfo.getAddrSpace() >= 256)
@@ -43,16 +46,14 @@ X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl,
// If not DWORD aligned or size is more than the threshold, call the library.
// The libc version is likely to be faster for these cases. It can use the
// address value and run time information about the CPU.
- if ((Align & 3) != 0 ||
- !ConstantSize ||
- ConstantSize->getZExtValue() >
- Subtarget->getMaxInlineSizeThreshold()) {
+ if ((Align & 3) != 0 || !ConstantSize ||
+ ConstantSize->getZExtValue() > Subtarget.getMaxInlineSizeThreshold()) {
// Check to see if there is a specialized entry-point for memory zeroing.
ConstantSDNode *V = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Src);
if (const char *bzeroEntry = V &&
- V->isNullValue() ? Subtarget->getBZeroEntry() : nullptr) {
- EVT IntPtr = TLI.getPointerTy();
+ V->isNullValue() ? Subtarget.getBZeroEntry() : nullptr) {
+ EVT IntPtr = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo().getPointerTy();
Type *IntPtrTy = getDataLayout()->getIntPtrType(*DAG.getContext());
TargetLowering::ArgListTy Args;
TargetLowering::ArgListEntry Entry;
@@ -68,7 +69,7 @@ X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl,
DAG.getExternalSymbol(bzeroEntry, IntPtr), &Args, 0)
.setDiscardResult();
- std::pair<SDValue,SDValue> CallResult = TLI.LowerCallTo(CLI);
+ std::pair<SDValue,SDValue> CallResult = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo().LowerCallTo(CLI);
return CallResult.second;
}
@@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl,
ValReg = X86::EAX;
Val = (Val << 8) | Val;
Val = (Val << 16) | Val;
- if (Subtarget->is64Bit() && ((Align & 0x7) == 0)) { // QWORD aligned
+ if (Subtarget.is64Bit() && ((Align & 0x7) == 0)) { // QWORD aligned
AVT = MVT::i64;
ValReg = X86::RAX;
Val = (Val << 32) | Val;
@@ -128,13 +129,11 @@ X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl,
InFlag = Chain.getValue(1);
}
- Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget->is64Bit() ? X86::RCX :
- X86::ECX,
- Count, InFlag);
+ Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget.is64Bit() ? X86::RCX : X86::ECX,
+ Count, InFlag);
InFlag = Chain.getValue(1);
- Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget->is64Bit() ? X86::RDI :
- X86::EDI,
- Dst, InFlag);
+ Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget.is64Bit() ? X86::RDI : X86::EDI,
+ Dst, InFlag);
InFlag = Chain.getValue(1);
SDVTList Tys = DAG.getVTList(MVT::Other, MVT::Glue);
@@ -182,10 +181,11 @@ X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemcpy(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl,
// This requires the copy size to be a constant, preferably
// within a subtarget-specific limit.
ConstantSDNode *ConstantSize = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Size);
+ const X86Subtarget &Subtarget = DAG.getTarget().getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>();
if (!ConstantSize)
return SDValue();
uint64_t SizeVal = ConstantSize->getZExtValue();
- if (!AlwaysInline && SizeVal > Subtarget->getMaxInlineSizeThreshold())
+ if (!AlwaysInline && SizeVal > Subtarget.getMaxInlineSizeThreshold())
return SDValue();
/// If not DWORD aligned, it is more efficient to call the library. However
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemcpy(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl,
AVT = MVT::i32;
else
// QWORD aligned
- AVT = Subtarget->is64Bit() ? MVT::i64 : MVT::i32;
+ AVT = Subtarget.is64Bit() ? MVT::i64 : MVT::i32;
unsigned UBytes = AVT.getSizeInBits() / 8;
unsigned CountVal = SizeVal / UBytes;
@@ -226,15 +226,15 @@ X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemcpy(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl,
unsigned BytesLeft = SizeVal % UBytes;
SDValue InFlag;
- Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget->is64Bit() ? X86::RCX :
+ Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget.is64Bit() ? X86::RCX :
X86::ECX,
Count, InFlag);
InFlag = Chain.getValue(1);
- Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget->is64Bit() ? X86::RDI :
+ Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget.is64Bit() ? X86::RDI :
X86::EDI,
Dst, InFlag);
InFlag = Chain.getValue(1);
- Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget->is64Bit() ? X86::RSI :
+ Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget.is64Bit() ? X86::RSI :
X86::ESI,
Src, InFlag);
InFlag = Chain.getValue(1);
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.h b/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.h
index 0d5dc38ae8..c12555a596 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.h
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.h
@@ -23,14 +23,8 @@ class X86TargetMachine;
class X86Subtarget;
class X86SelectionDAGInfo : public TargetSelectionDAGInfo {
- /// Subtarget - Keep a pointer to the X86Subtarget around so that we can
- /// make the right decision when generating code for different targets.
- const X86Subtarget *Subtarget;
-
- const X86TargetLowering &TLI;
-
public:
- explicit X86SelectionDAGInfo(const X86TargetMachine &TM);
+ explicit X86SelectionDAGInfo(const DataLayout &DL);
~X86SelectionDAGInfo();
SDValue EmitTargetCodeForMemset(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl,
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
index 73fd21479d..83b304184f 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ X86TargetMachine::X86TargetMachine(const Target &T, StringRef TT, StringRef CPU,
Subtarget.getStackAlignment(),
Subtarget.is64Bit() ? -8 : -4),
DL(computeDataLayout(*getSubtargetImpl())), InstrInfo(*this),
- TLInfo(*this), TSInfo(*this), JITInfo(*this) {
+ TLInfo(*this), TSInfo(DL), JITInfo(*this) {
// Determine the PICStyle based on the target selected.
if (getRelocationModel() == Reloc::Static) {
// Unless we're in PIC or DynamicNoPIC mode, set the PIC style to None.