summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/CodingStandards.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com>2012-10-26 22:08:46 +0000
committerJordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com>2012-10-26 22:08:46 +0000
commit715672c643443225d21008b177b558504b6284e8 (patch)
treefeeef35a461cf440aa3caa8a2443d1f56b8e8285 /docs/CodingStandards.rst
parent002ef57e843c9ae204f37209d8378bf95f67fd95 (diff)
downloadllvm-715672c643443225d21008b177b558504b6284e8.tar.gz
llvm-715672c643443225d21008b177b558504b6284e8.tar.bz2
llvm-715672c643443225d21008b177b558504b6284e8.tar.xz
Suggest llvm_unreachable over assert(0).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166821 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/CodingStandards.rst')
-rw-r--r--docs/CodingStandards.rst25
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/docs/CodingStandards.rst b/docs/CodingStandards.rst
index 418e3f05a3..90835307b1 100644
--- a/docs/CodingStandards.rst
+++ b/docs/CodingStandards.rst
@@ -862,23 +862,28 @@ Here are more examples:
You get the idea.
-Please be aware that, when adding assert statements, not all compilers are aware
-of the semantics of the assert. In some places, asserts are used to indicate a
-piece of code that should not be reached. These are typically of the form:
+In the past, asserts were used to indicate a piece of code that should not be
+reached. These were typically of the form:
.. code-block:: c++
- assert(0 && "Some helpful error message");
+ assert(0 && "Invalid radix for integer literal");
-When used in a function that returns a value, they should be followed with a
-return statement and a comment indicating that this line is never reached. This
-will prevent a compiler which is unable to deduce that the assert statement
-never returns from generating a warning.
+This has a few issues, the main one being that some compilers might not
+understand the assertion, or warn about a missing return in builds where
+assertions are compiled out.
+
+Today, we have something much better: ``llvm_unreachable``:
.. code-block:: c++
- assert(0 && "Some helpful error message");
- return 0;
+ llvm_unreachable("Invalid radix for integer literal");
+
+When assertions are enabled, this will print the message if it's ever reached
+and then exit the program. When assertions are disabled (i.e. in release
+builds), ``llvm_unreachable`` becomes a hint to compilers to skip generating
+code for this branch. If the compiler does not support this, it will fall back
+to the "abort" implementation.
Another issue is that values used only by assertions will produce an "unused
value" warning when assertions are disabled. For example, this code will warn: