summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJim Laskey <jlaskey@mac.com>2006-08-04 18:10:12 +0000
committerJim Laskey <jlaskey@mac.com>2006-08-04 18:10:12 +0000
commit5fa8fff8d21d98896957f3a891968c3ffc66c096 (patch)
tree1a96966e2ef09b7b33c7be80a643576aebe98275 /docs
parent2210eeb0d23f48d2dfa5aca497e1f19ffcf36522 (diff)
downloadllvm-5fa8fff8d21d98896957f3a891968c3ffc66c096.tar.gz
llvm-5fa8fff8d21d98896957f3a891968c3ffc66c096.tar.bz2
llvm-5fa8fff8d21d98896957f3a891968c3ffc66c096.tar.xz
Added how to add machine passes to command line options.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@29528 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'docs')
-rw-r--r--docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html293
1 files changed, 216 insertions, 77 deletions
diff --git a/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html b/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
index 0ca54994f5..71dc4926ac 100644
--- a/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
+++ b/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@
<ul>
<li><a href="#releaseMemory">The <tt>releaseMemory</tt> method</a></li>
</ul></li>
+ <li><a href="#registering">Registering dynamically loaded passes</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li><a href="#registering_existing">Using existing registries</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#registering_new">Creating new registries</a></li>
+ </ul></li>
<li><a href="#debughints">Using GDB with dynamically loaded passes</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#breakpoint">Setting a breakpoint in your pass</a></li>
@@ -97,7 +102,8 @@
</ol>
<div class="doc_author">
- <p>Written by <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a></p>
+ <p>Written by <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a>,
+ <a href="mailto:jlaskey@apple.com">Jim Laskey</a></p>
</div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
@@ -163,7 +169,7 @@ source tree in the <tt>lib/Transforms/Hello</tt> directory.</p>
copy the following into <tt>Makefile</tt>:</p>
<hr/>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
# Makefile for hello pass
# Path to top level of LLVM heirarchy
@@ -181,7 +187,7 @@ LOADABLE_MODULE = 1
# Include the makefile implementation stuff
include $(LEVEL)/Makefile.common
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>This makefile specifies that all of the <tt>.cpp</tt> files in the current
directory are to be compiled and linked together into a
@@ -205,10 +211,10 @@ the pass itself.</p>
<p>Now that we have a way to compile our new pass, we just have to write it.
Start out with:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>#include</b> "<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/Pass_8h-source.html">llvm/Pass.h</a>"
<b>#include</b> "<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/Function_8h-source.html">llvm/Function.h</a>"
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Which are needed because we are writing a <tt><a
href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Pass.html">Pass</a></tt>, and
@@ -216,18 +222,18 @@ we are operating on <tt><a
href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html">Function</a></tt>'s.</p>
<p>Next we have:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>using namespace llvm;</b>
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>... which is required because the functions from the include files
live in the llvm namespace.
</p>
<p>Next we have:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>namespace</b> {
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>... which starts out an anonymous namespace. Anonymous namespaces are to C++
what the "<tt>static</tt>" keyword is to C (at global scope). It makes the
@@ -237,9 +243,9 @@ information.</p>
<p>Next, we declare our pass itself:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>struct</b> Hello : <b>public</b> <a href="#FunctionPass">FunctionPass</a> {
-</pre><p>
+</pre></div><p>
<p>This declares a "<tt>Hello</tt>" class that is a subclass of <tt><a
href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1FunctionPass.html">FunctionPass</a></tt>.
@@ -248,13 +254,13 @@ href="#passtype">later</a>, but for now, know that <a
href="#FunctionPass"><tt>FunctionPass</tt></a>'s operate a function at a
time.</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> <a href="#runOnFunction">runOnFunction</a>(Function &amp;F) {
std::cerr &lt;&lt; "<i>Hello: </i>" &lt;&lt; F.getName() &lt;&lt; "\n";
<b>return false</b>;
}
}; <i>// end of struct Hello</i>
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>We declare a "<a href="#runOnFunction"><tt>runOnFunction</tt></a>" method,
which overloads an abstract virtual method inherited from <a
@@ -262,10 +268,10 @@ href="#FunctionPass"><tt>FunctionPass</tt></a>. This is where we are supposed
to do our thing, so we just print out our message with the name of each
function.</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
RegisterOpt&lt;Hello&gt; X("<i>hello</i>", "<i>Hello World Pass</i>");
} <i>// end of anonymous namespace</i>
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Lastly, we register our class <tt>Hello</tt>, giving it a command line
argument "<tt>hello</tt>", and a name "<tt>Hello World Pass</tt>". There are
@@ -275,7 +281,7 @@ depending on what it is to be used for. For "optimizations" we use the
<p>As a whole, the <tt>.cpp</tt> file looks like:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>#include</b> "<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/Pass_8h-source.html">llvm/Pass.h</a>"
<b>#include</b> "<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/Function_8h-source.html">llvm/Function.h</a>"
@@ -291,7 +297,7 @@ depending on what it is to be used for. For "optimizations" we use the
RegisterOpt&lt;Hello&gt; X("<i>hello</i>", "<i>Hello World Pass</i>");
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Now that it's all together, compile the file with a simple "<tt>gmake</tt>"
command in the local directory and you should get a new
@@ -320,12 +326,12 @@ LLVM. We can now run the bytecode file (<tt>hello.bc</tt>) for the program
through our transformation like this (or course, any bytecode file will
work):</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/Hello.so -hello &lt; hello.bc &gt; /dev/null
Hello: __main
Hello: puts
Hello: main
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The '<tt>-load</tt>' option specifies that '<tt>opt</tt>' should load your
pass as a shared object, which makes '<tt>-hello</tt>' a valid command line
@@ -337,7 +343,7 @@ interesting way, we just throw away the result of <tt>opt</tt> (sending it to
<p>To see what happened to the other string you registered, try running
<tt>opt</tt> with the <tt>--help</tt> option:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/Hello.so --help
OVERVIEW: llvm .bc -&gt; .bc modular optimizer
@@ -354,7 +360,7 @@ OPTIONS:
-inline - Function Integration/Inlining
-instcombine - Combine redundant instructions
...
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The pass name get added as the information string for your pass, giving some
documentation to users of <tt>opt</tt>. Now that you have a working pass, you
@@ -365,7 +371,7 @@ line option (<tt>--time-passes</tt>) that allows you to get information about
the execution time of your pass along with the other passes you queue up. For
example:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/Hello.so -hello -time-passes &lt; hello.bc &gt; /dev/null
Hello: __main
Hello: puts
@@ -381,7 +387,7 @@ Hello: main
0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0013 ( 2.7%) Module Verifier
<b> 0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0033 ( 6.9%) Hello World Pass</b>
0.0100 (100.0%) 0.0100 (100.0%) 0.0200 (100.0%) 0.0479 (100.0%) TOTAL
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>As you can see, our implementation above is pretty fast :). The additional
passes listed are automatically inserted by the '<tt>opt</tt>' tool to verify
@@ -467,9 +473,9 @@ following signature:</p>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> runOnModule(Module &amp;M) = 0;
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>runOnModule</tt> method performs the interesting work of the pass.
It should return true if the module was modified by the transformation and
@@ -535,9 +541,9 @@ false if they didn't.</p>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> doInitialization(Module &amp;M);
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>doIninitialize</tt> method is allowed to do most of the things that
<tt>CallGraphSCCPass</tt>'s are not allowed to do. They can add and remove
@@ -556,9 +562,9 @@ fast).</p>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> runOnSCC(const std::vector&lt;CallGraphNode *&gt; &amp;SCCM) = 0;
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>runOnSCC</tt> method performs the interesting work of the pass, and
should return true if the module was modified by the transformation, false
@@ -574,9 +580,9 @@ otherwise.</p>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> doFinalization(Module &amp;M);
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>doFinalization</tt> method is an infrequently used method that is
called when the pass framework has finished calling <a
@@ -625,9 +631,9 @@ should return true if they modified the program, or false if they didn't.</p>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> doInitialization(Module &amp;M);
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>doIninitialize</tt> method is allowed to do most of the things that
<tt>FunctionPass</tt>'s are not allowed to do. They can add and remove
@@ -653,9 +659,9 @@ free functions that it needs, adding prototypes to the module if necessary.</p>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> runOnFunction(Function &amp;F) = 0;
-</pre><p>
+</pre></div><p>
<p>The <tt>runOnFunction</tt> method must be implemented by your subclass to do
the transformation or analysis work of your pass. As usual, a true value should
@@ -671,9 +677,9 @@ be returned if the function is modified.</p>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> doFinalization(Module &amp;M);
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>doFinalization</tt> method is an infrequently used method that is
called when the pass framework has finished calling <a
@@ -719,9 +725,9 @@ href="#FunctionPass"><tt>FunctionPass</tt></a>'s have, but also have the followi
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> doInitialization(Function &amp;F);
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>doIninitialize</tt> method is allowed to do most of the things that
<tt>BasicBlockPass</tt>'s are not allowed to do, but that
@@ -740,9 +746,9 @@ fast).</p>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> runOnBasicBlock(BasicBlock &amp;BB) = 0;
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Override this function to do the work of the <tt>BasicBlockPass</tt>. This
function is not allowed to inspect or modify basic blocks other than the
@@ -759,9 +765,9 @@ if the basic block is modified.</p>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> doFinalization(Function &amp;F);
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>doFinalization</tt> method is an infrequently used method that is
called when the pass framework has finished calling <a
@@ -805,9 +811,9 @@ data)</li>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &amp;MF) = 0;
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p><tt>runOnMachineFunction</tt> can be considered the main entry point of a
<tt>MachineFunctionPass</tt>; that is, you should override this method to do the
@@ -877,9 +883,9 @@ should implement the virtual <tt>print</tt> method:</p>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual void</b> print(std::ostream &amp;O, <b>const</b> Module *M) <b>const</b>;
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>print</tt> method must be implemented by "analyses" in order to print
a human readable version of the analysis results. This is useful for debugging
@@ -927,9 +933,9 @@ having any prerequisite passes, and invalidating <b>all</b> other passes.</p>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual void</b> getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &amp;Info) <b>const</b>;
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>By implementing the <tt>getAnalysisUsage</tt> method, the required and
invalidated sets may be specified for your transformation. The implementation
@@ -1008,24 +1014,24 @@ the fact that it hacks on the CFG.
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<i>// This is an example implementation from an analysis, which does not modify
// the program at all, yet has a prerequisite.</i>
<b>void</b> <a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1PostDominanceFrontier.html">PostDominanceFrontier</a>::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &amp;AU) <b>const</b> {
AU.setPreservesAll();
AU.addRequired&lt;<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1PostDominatorTree.html">PostDominatorTree</a>&gt;();
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>and:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<i>// This example modifies the program, but does not modify the CFG</i>
<b>void</b> <a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/structLICM.html">LICM</a>::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &amp;AU) <b>const</b> {
AU.setPreservesCFG();
AU.addRequired&lt;<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1LoopInfo.html">LoopInfo</a>&gt;();
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
</div>
@@ -1042,12 +1048,12 @@ required with the <a href="#getAnalysisUsage"><tt>getAnalysisUsage</tt></a>
method. It takes a single template argument that specifies which pass class you
want, and returns a reference to that pass. For example:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
bool LICM::runOnFunction(Function &amp;F) {
LoopInfo &amp;LI = getAnalysis&lt;LoopInfo&gt;();
...
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>This method call returns a reference to the pass desired. You may get a
runtime assertion failure if you attempt to get an analysis that you did not
@@ -1062,13 +1068,13 @@ If your pass is capable of updating analyses if they exist (e.g.,
<tt>getAnalysisToUpdate</tt> method, which returns a pointer to the analysis if
it is active. For example:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
...
if (DominatorSet *DS = getAnalysisToUpdate&lt;DominatorSet&gt;()) {
<i>// A DominatorSet is active. This code will update it.</i>
}
...
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
</div>
@@ -1163,14 +1169,14 @@ an analysis should be registered, with a human readable name provided for it.
Unlike registration of passes, there is no command line argument to be specified
for the Analysis Group Interface itself, because it is "abstract":</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>static</b> RegisterAnalysisGroup&lt;<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1AliasAnalysis.html">AliasAnalysis</a>&gt; A("<i>Alias Analysis</i>");
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Once the analysis is registered, passes can declare that they are valid
implementations of the interface by using the following code:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>namespace</b> {
//<i> Analysis Group implementations <b>must</b> be registered normally...</i>
RegisterOpt&lt;FancyAA&gt;
@@ -1179,7 +1185,7 @@ implementations of the interface by using the following code:</p>
//<i> Declare that we implement the AliasAnalysis interface</i>
RegisterAnalysisGroup&lt;<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1AliasAnalysis.html">AliasAnalysis</a>, FancyAA&gt; C;
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>This just shows a class <tt>FancyAA</tt> that is registered normally, then
uses the <tt>RegisterAnalysisGroup</tt> template to "join" the <tt><a
@@ -1188,7 +1194,7 @@ analysis group. Every implementation of an analysis group should join using
this template. A single pass may join multiple different analysis groups with
no problem.</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>namespace</b> {
//<i> Analysis Group implementations <b>must</b> be registered normally...</i>
RegisterOpt&lt;<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/structBasicAliasAnalysis.html">BasicAliasAnalysis</a>&gt;
@@ -1197,7 +1203,7 @@ no problem.</p>
//<i> Declare that we implement the AliasAnalysis interface</i>
RegisterAnalysisGroup&lt;<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1AliasAnalysis.html">AliasAnalysis</a>, <a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/structBasicAliasAnalysis.html">BasicAliasAnalysis</a>, <b>true</b>&gt; E;
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Here we show how the default implementation is specified (using the extra
argument to the <tt>RegisterAnalysisGroup</tt> template). There must be exactly
@@ -1290,7 +1296,7 @@ option, just type '<tt>opt --help-hidden</tt>').</p>
how our <a href="#basiccode">Hello World</a> pass interacts with other passes.
Lets try it out with the <tt>gcse</tt> and <tt>licm</tt> passes:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/Hello.so -gcse -licm --debug-pass=Structure &lt; hello.bc &gt; /dev/null
Module Pass Manager
Function Pass Manager
@@ -1308,7 +1314,7 @@ Module Pass Manager
-- Module Verifier
Bytecode Writer
--Bytecode Writer
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>This output shows us when passes are constructed and when the analysis
results are known to be dead (prefixed with '<tt>--</tt>'). Here we see that
@@ -1327,7 +1333,7 @@ passes.</p>
<p>Lets see how this changes when we run the <a href="#basiccode">Hello
World</a> pass in between the two passes:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/Hello.so -gcse -hello -licm --debug-pass=Structure &lt; hello.bc &gt; /dev/null
Module Pass Manager
Function Pass Manager
@@ -1352,23 +1358,23 @@ Module Pass Manager
Hello: __main
Hello: puts
Hello: main
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Here we see that the <a href="#basiccode">Hello World</a> pass has killed the
Dominator Set pass, even though it doesn't modify the code at all! To fix this,
we need to add the following <a
href="#getAnalysisUsage"><tt>getAnalysisUsage</tt></a> method to our pass:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<i>// We don't modify the program, so we preserve all analyses</i>
<b>virtual void</b> getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &amp;AU) <b>const</b> {
AU.setPreservesAll();
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Now when we run our pass, we get this output:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/Hello.so -gcse -hello -licm --debug-pass=Structure &lt; hello.bc &gt; /dev/null
Pass Arguments: -gcse -hello -licm
Module Pass Manager
@@ -1392,7 +1398,7 @@ Module Pass Manager
Hello: __main
Hello: puts
Hello: main
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Which shows that we don't accidentally invalidate dominator information
anymore, and therefore do not have to compute it twice.</p>
@@ -1406,9 +1412,9 @@ anymore, and therefore do not have to compute it twice.</p>
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual void</b> releaseMemory();
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>PassManager</tt> automatically determines when to compute analysis
results, and how long to keep them around for. Because the lifetime of the pass
@@ -1427,6 +1433,139 @@ class, before the next call of <tt>run*</tt> in your pass.</p>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
<div class="doc_section">
+ <a name="registering">Registering dynamically loaded passes</a>
+</div>
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p><i>Size matters</i> when constructing production quality tools using llvm,
+both for the purposes of distribution, and for regulating the resident code size
+when running on the target system. Therefore, it becomes desirable to
+selectively use some passes, while omitting others and maintain the flexibility
+to change configurations later on. You want to be able to do all this, and,
+provide feedback to the user. This is where pass registration comes into
+play.</p>
+
+<p>The fundamental mechanisms for pass registration are the
+<tt>MachinePassRegistry</tt> class and subclasses of
+<tt>MachinePassRegistryNode</tt>.</p>
+
+<p>An instance of <tt>MachinePassRegistry</tt> is used to maintain a list of
+<tt>MachinePassRegistryNode</tt> objects. This instance maintains the list and
+communicates additions and deletions to the command line interface.</p>
+
+<p>An instance of <tt>MachinePassRegistryNode</tt> subclass is used to maintain
+information provided about a particular pass. This information includes the
+command line name, the command help string and the address of the function used
+to create an instance of the pass. A global static constructor of one of these
+instances <i>registers</i> with a corresponding <tt>MachinePassRegistry</tt>,
+the static destructor <i>unregisters</i>. Thus a pass that is statically linked
+in the tool will be registered at start up. A dynamically loaded pass will
+register on load and unregister at unload.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="registering_existing">Using existing registries</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>There are predefined registries to track instruction scheduling
+(<tt>RegisterScheduler</tt>) and register allocation (<tt>RegisterRegAlloc</tt>)
+machine passes. Here we will describe how to <i>register</i> a register
+allocator machine pass.</p>
+
+<p>Implement your register allocator machine pass. In your register allocator
+.cpp file add the following include;</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
+ #include ""llvm/CodeGen/RegAllocRegistry.h""
+</pre></div>
+
+<p>Also in your register allocator .cpp file, define a creator function in the
+form; </p>
+
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
+ FunctionPass *createMyRegisterAllocator() {
+ return new MyRegisterAllocator();
+ }
+</pre></div>
+
+<p>Note that the signature of this function should match the type of
+<tt>RegisterRegAlloc::FunctionPassCtor</tt>. In the same file add the
+"installing" declaration, in the form;</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
+ static RegisterRegAlloc myRegAlloc("myregalloc",
+ " my register allocator help string",
+ createMyRegisterAllocator);
+</pre></div>
+
+<p>Note the two spaces prior to the help string produces a tidy result on the
+--help query.</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
+$ llc --help
+ ...
+ -regalloc - Register allocator to use: (default = linearscan)
+ =linearscan - linear scan register allocator
+ =local - local register allocator
+ =simple - simple register allocator
+ =myregalloc - my register allocator help string
+ ...
+</pre></div>
+
+<p>And that's it. The user is now free to use <tt>-regalloc=myregalloc</tt> as
+an option. Registering instruction schedulers is similar except use the
+<tt>RegisterRegAlloc</tt> class. Note that the
+<tt>RegisterRegAlloc::FunctionPassCtor</tt> is significantly different from
+<tt>RegisterRegAlloc::FunctionPassCtor</tt>.</p>
+
+<p>To force the load/linking of your register allocator into the llc/lli tools,
+add your creator function's global declaration to "Passes.h" and add a "pseudo"
+call line to <tt>llvm/Codegen/LinkAllCodegenComponents.h</tt>.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="registering_new">Creating new registries</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>The easiest way to get started is to clone one of the existing registries; we
+recommend <tt>llvm/CodeGen/RegAllocRegistry.h</tt>. The key things to modify
+are the class name and the <tt>FunctionPassCtor</tt> type.</p>
+
+<p>Then you need to declare the registry. Example: if your pass registry is
+<tt>RegisterMyPasses</tt> then define;</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
+MachinePassRegistry RegisterMyPasses::Registry;
+</pre></div>
+
+<p>And finally, declare the command line option for your passes. Example:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
+ cl::opt&lt;RegisterMyPasses::FunctionPassCtor, false,
+ RegisterPassParser&lt;RegisterMyPasses&gt &gt
+ MyPassOpt("mypass",
+ cl::init(&amp;createDefaultMyPass),
+ cl::desc("my pass option help"));
+</pre></div>
+
+<p>Here the command option is "mypass", with createDefaultMyPass as the default
+creator.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<div class="doc_section">
<a name="debughints">Using GDB with dynamically loaded passes</a>
</div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
@@ -1454,7 +1593,7 @@ on that.</p>
<p>First thing you do is start <tt>gdb</tt> on the <tt>opt</tt> process:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ <b>gdb opt</b>
GNU gdb 5.0
Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@@ -1464,7 +1603,7 @@ Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "sparc-sun-solaris2.6"...
(gdb)
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Note that <tt>opt</tt> has a lot of debugging information in it, so it takes
time to load. Be patient. Since we cannot set a breakpoint in our pass yet
@@ -1474,7 +1613,7 @@ object. The most foolproof way of doing this is to set a breakpoint in
<tt>PassManager::run</tt> and then run the process with the arguments you
want:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
(gdb) <b>break PassManager::run</b>
Breakpoint 1 at 0x2413bc: file Pass.cpp, line 70.
(gdb) <b>run test.bc -load $(LLVMTOP)/llvm/Debug/lib/[libname].so -[passoption]</b>
@@ -1482,7 +1621,7 @@ Starting program: opt test.bc -load $(LLVMTOP)/llvm/Debug/lib/[libname].so -[pas
Breakpoint 1, PassManager::run (this=0xffbef174, M=@0x70b298) at Pass.cpp:70
70 bool PassManager::run(Module &amp;M) { return PM-&gt;run(M); }
(gdb)
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Once the <tt>opt</tt> stops in the <tt>PassManager::run</tt> method you are
now free to set breakpoints in your pass so that you can trace through execution