summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/llvm/CodeGen
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>2004-07-23 08:24:23 +0000
committerChris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>2004-07-23 08:24:23 +0000
commitec2bc645053e9051ada01fac6a555df17a85c91d (patch)
tree03fd93fa7edc2b0a29a91c261d1e6e4f82a504ec /include/llvm/CodeGen
parent5c2e282865821ba65795a2d14bd95e5a82a6be41 (diff)
downloadllvm-ec2bc645053e9051ada01fac6a555df17a85c91d.tar.gz
llvm-ec2bc645053e9051ada01fac6a555df17a85c91d.tar.bz2
llvm-ec2bc645053e9051ada01fac6a555df17a85c91d.tar.xz
Improve comments a bit
Use an explicit LiveRange class to represent ranges instead of an std::pair. This is a minor cleanup, but is really intended to make a future patch simpler and less invasive. Alkis, could you please take a look at LiveInterval::liveAt? I suspect that you can add an operator<(unsigned) to LiveRange, allowing us to speed up the upper_bound call by quite a bit (this would also apply to other callers of upper/lower_bound). I would do it myself, but I still don't understand that crazy liveAt function, despite the comment. :) Basically I would like to see this: LiveRange dummy(index, index+1); Ranges::const_iterator r = std::upper_bound(ranges.begin(), ranges.end(), dummy); Turn into: Ranges::const_iterator r = std::upper_bound(ranges.begin(), ranges.end(), index); git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@15130 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'include/llvm/CodeGen')
-rw-r--r--include/llvm/CodeGen/LiveIntervalAnalysis.h33
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/include/llvm/CodeGen/LiveIntervalAnalysis.h b/include/llvm/CodeGen/LiveIntervalAnalysis.h
index a78aed186f..a70deffdc1 100644
--- a/include/llvm/CodeGen/LiveIntervalAnalysis.h
+++ b/include/llvm/CodeGen/LiveIntervalAnalysis.h
@@ -29,9 +29,29 @@ namespace llvm {
class MRegisterInfo;
class VirtRegMap;
+ /// LiveRange structure - This represents a simple register range in the
+ /// program, with an inclusive start point and an exclusive end point.
+ /// These ranges are rendered as [start,end).
+ struct LiveRange {
+ unsigned start; // Start point of the interval (inclusive)
+ unsigned end; // End point of the interval (exclusive)
+ LiveRange(unsigned S, unsigned E) : start(S), end(E) {
+ assert(S < E && "Cannot create empty or backwards range");
+ }
+
+ bool operator<(const LiveRange &LR) const {
+ return start < LR.start || (start == LR.start && end < LR.end);
+ }
+ bool operator==(const LiveRange &LR) const {
+ return start == LR.start && end == LR.end;
+ }
+ private:
+ LiveRange(); // DO NOT IMPLEMENT
+ };
+ std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, const LiveRange &LR);
+
struct LiveInterval {
- typedef std::pair<unsigned, unsigned> Range;
- typedef std::vector<Range> Ranges;
+ typedef std::vector<LiveRange> Ranges;
unsigned reg; // the register of this interval
float weight; // weight of this interval:
// (number of uses *10^loopDepth)
@@ -44,14 +64,17 @@ namespace llvm {
bool spilled() const;
+ /// start - Return the lowest numbered slot covered by interval.
unsigned start() const {
assert(!empty() && "empty interval for register");
- return ranges.front().first;
+ return ranges.front().start;
}
+ /// end - return the maximum point of the interval of the whole,
+ /// exclusive.
unsigned end() const {
assert(!empty() && "empty interval for register");
- return ranges.back().second;
+ return ranges.back().end;
}
bool expiredAt(unsigned index) const {
@@ -62,7 +85,7 @@ namespace llvm {
bool overlaps(const LiveInterval& other) const;
- void addRange(unsigned start, unsigned end);
+ void addRange(LiveRange R);
void join(const LiveInterval& other);