summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2014-04-18 10:50:32 +0000
committerChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2014-04-18 10:50:32 +0000
commit4c7edb124086ada5d5667e8e87e5a697441ed0f5 (patch)
tree81d712906051952696693b84ca7f19ac9ad3bf59 /include
parentc32e261a1a363da829a58eb37696205c67110eb2 (diff)
downloadllvm-4c7edb124086ada5d5667e8e87e5a697441ed0f5.tar.gz
llvm-4c7edb124086ada5d5667e8e87e5a697441ed0f5.tar.bz2
llvm-4c7edb124086ada5d5667e8e87e5a697441ed0f5.tar.xz
[LCG] Add support for building persistent and connected SCCs to the
LazyCallGraph. This is the start of the whole point of this different abstraction, but it is just the initial bits. Here is a run-down of what's going on here. I'm planning to incorporate some (or all) of this into comments going forward, hopefully with better editing and wording. =] The crux of the problem with the traditional way of building SCCs is that they are ephemeral. The new pass manager however really needs the ability to associate analysis passes and results of analysis passes with SCCs in order to expose these analysis passes to the SCC passes. Making this work is kind-of the whole point of the new pass manager. =] So, when we're building SCCs for the call graph, we actually want to build persistent nodes that stick around and can be reasoned about later. We'd also like the ability to walk the SCC graph in more complex ways than just the traditional postorder traversal of the current CGSCC walk. That means that in addition to being persistent, the SCCs need to be connected into a useful graph structure. However, we still want the SCCs to be formed lazily where possible. These constraints are quite hard to satisfy with the SCC iterator. Also, using that would bypass our ability to actually add data to the nodes of the call graph to facilite implementing the Tarjan walk. So I've re-implemented things in a more direct and embedded way. This immediately makes it easy to get the persistence and connectivity correct, and it also allows leveraging the existing nodes to simplify the algorithm. I've worked somewhat to make this implementation more closely follow the traditional paper's nomenclature and strategy, although it is still a bit obtuse because it isn't recursive, using an explicit stack and a tail call instead, and it is interruptable, resuming each time we need another SCC. The other tricky bit here, and what actually took almost all the time and trials and errors I spent building this, is exactly *what* graph structure to build for the SCCs. The naive thing to build is the call graph in its newly acyclic form. I wrote about 4 versions of this which did precisely this. Inevitably, when I experimented with them across various use cases, they became incredibly awkward. It was all implementable, but it felt like a complete wrong fit. Square peg, round hole. There were two overriding aspects that pushed me in a different direction: 1) We want to discover the SCC graph in a postorder fashion. That means the root node will be the *last* node we find. Using the call-SCC DAG as the graph structure of the SCCs results in an orphaned graph until we discover a root. 2) We will eventually want to walk the SCC graph in parallel, exploring distinct sub-graphs independently, and synchronizing at merge points. This again is not helped by the call-SCC DAG structure. The structure which, quite surprisingly, ended up being completely natural to use is the *inverse* of the call-SCC DAG. We add the leaf SCCs to the graph as "roots", and have edges to the caller SCCs. Once I switched to building this structure, everything just fell into place elegantly. Aside from general cleanups (there are FIXMEs and too few comments overall) that are still needed, the other missing piece of this is support for iterating across levels of the SCC graph. These will become useful for implementing #2, but they aren't an immediate priority. Once SCCs are in good shape, I'll be working on adding mutation support for incremental updates and adding the pass manager that this analysis enables. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206581 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r--include/llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h118
1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h b/include/llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h
index d22f2cf8db..bcd06c2a10 100644
--- a/include/llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h
+++ b/include/llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h
@@ -38,8 +38,10 @@
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/PointerUnion.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SetVector.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/iterator_range.h"
#include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
@@ -100,6 +102,7 @@ class raw_ostream;
class LazyCallGraph {
public:
class Node;
+ class SCC;
typedef SmallVector<PointerUnion<Function *, Node *>, 4> NodeVectorT;
typedef SmallVectorImpl<PointerUnion<Function *, Node *>> NodeVectorImplT;
@@ -173,9 +176,16 @@ public:
/// a callee, and facilitate iteration of child nodes in the graph.
class Node {
friend class LazyCallGraph;
+ friend class LazyCallGraph::SCC;
LazyCallGraph *G;
Function &F;
+
+ // We provide for the DFS numbering and Tarjan walk lowlink numbers to be
+ // stored directly within the node.
+ int DFSNumber;
+ int LowLink;
+
mutable NodeVectorT Callees;
SmallPtrSet<Function *, 4> CalleeSet;
@@ -201,6 +211,79 @@ public:
bool operator!=(const Node &N) const { return !operator==(N); }
};
+ /// \brief An SCC of the call graph.
+ ///
+ /// This represents a Strongly Connected Component of the call graph as
+ /// a collection of call graph nodes. While the order of nodes in the SCC is
+ /// stable, it is not any particular order.
+ class SCC {
+ friend class LazyCallGraph;
+ friend class LazyCallGraph::Node;
+
+ SmallSetVector<SCC *, 1> ParentSCCs;
+ SmallVector<Node *, 1> Nodes;
+ SmallPtrSet<Function *, 1> NodeSet;
+
+ SCC() {}
+
+ public:
+ typedef SmallVectorImpl<Node *>::const_iterator iterator;
+
+ iterator begin() const { return Nodes.begin(); }
+ iterator end() const { return Nodes.end(); }
+ };
+
+ /// \brief A post-order depth-first SCC iterator over the call graph.
+ ///
+ /// This iterator triggers the Tarjan DFS-based formation of the SCC DAG for
+ /// the call graph, walking it lazily in depth-first post-order. That is, it
+ /// always visits SCCs for a callee prior to visiting the SCC for a caller
+ /// (when they are in different SCCs).
+ class postorder_scc_iterator
+ : public std::iterator<std::forward_iterator_tag, SCC *, ptrdiff_t, SCC *,
+ SCC *> {
+ friend class LazyCallGraph;
+ friend class LazyCallGraph::Node;
+ typedef std::iterator<std::forward_iterator_tag, SCC *, ptrdiff_t,
+ SCC *, SCC *> BaseT;
+
+ /// \brief Nonce type to select the constructor for the end iterator.
+ struct IsAtEndT {};
+
+ LazyCallGraph *G;
+ SCC *C;
+
+ // Build the begin iterator for a node.
+ postorder_scc_iterator(LazyCallGraph &G) : G(&G) {
+ C = G.getNextSCCInPostOrder();
+ }
+
+ // Build the end iterator for a node. This is selected purely by overload.
+ postorder_scc_iterator(LazyCallGraph &G, IsAtEndT /*Nonce*/)
+ : G(&G), C(nullptr) {}
+
+ public:
+ bool operator==(const postorder_scc_iterator &Arg) {
+ return G == Arg.G && C == Arg.C;
+ }
+ bool operator!=(const postorder_scc_iterator &Arg) {
+ return !operator==(Arg);
+ }
+
+ reference operator*() const { return C; }
+ pointer operator->() const { return operator*(); }
+
+ postorder_scc_iterator &operator++() {
+ C = G->getNextSCCInPostOrder();
+ return *this;
+ }
+ postorder_scc_iterator operator++(int) {
+ postorder_scc_iterator prev = *this;
+ ++*this;
+ return prev;
+ }
+ };
+
/// \brief Construct a graph for the given module.
///
/// This sets up the graph and computes all of the entry points of the graph.
@@ -229,6 +312,18 @@ public:
iterator begin() { return iterator(*this, EntryNodes); }
iterator end() { return iterator(*this, EntryNodes, iterator::IsAtEndT()); }
+ postorder_scc_iterator postorder_scc_begin() {
+ return postorder_scc_iterator(*this);
+ }
+ postorder_scc_iterator postorder_scc_end() {
+ return postorder_scc_iterator(*this, postorder_scc_iterator::IsAtEndT());
+ }
+
+ iterator_range<postorder_scc_iterator> postorder_sccs() {
+ return iterator_range<postorder_scc_iterator>(postorder_scc_begin(),
+ postorder_scc_end());
+ }
+
/// \brief Lookup a function in the graph which has already been scanned and
/// added.
Node *lookup(const Function &F) const { return NodeMap.lookup(&F); }
@@ -259,12 +354,35 @@ private:
/// \brief Set of the entry nodes to the graph.
SmallPtrSet<Function *, 4> EntryNodeSet;
+ /// \brief Allocator that holds all the call graph SCCs.
+ SpecificBumpPtrAllocator<SCC> SCCBPA;
+
+ /// \brief Maps Function -> SCC for fast lookup.
+ DenseMap<const Function *, SCC *> SCCMap;
+
+ /// \brief The leaf SCCs of the graph.
+ ///
+ /// These are all of the SCCs which have no children.
+ SmallVector<SCC *, 4> LeafSCCs;
+
+ /// \brief Stack of nodes not-yet-processed into SCCs.
+ SmallVector<std::pair<Node *, iterator>, 4> DFSStack;
+
+ /// \brief Set of entry nodes not-yet-processed into SCCs.
+ SmallSetVector<Function *, 4> SCCEntryNodes;
+
+ /// \brief Counter for the next DFS number to assign.
+ int NextDFSNumber;
+
/// \brief Helper to insert a new function, with an already looked-up entry in
/// the NodeMap.
Node *insertInto(Function &F, Node *&MappedN);
/// \brief Helper to copy a node from another graph into this one.
Node *copyInto(const Node &OtherN);
+
+ /// \brief Retrieve the next node in the post-order SCC walk of the call graph.
+ SCC *getNextSCCInPostOrder();
};
// Provide GraphTraits specializations for call graphs.