diff options
author | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-04-18 10:50:32 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-04-18 10:50:32 +0000 |
commit | 4c7edb124086ada5d5667e8e87e5a697441ed0f5 (patch) | |
tree | 81d712906051952696693b84ca7f19ac9ad3bf59 /include | |
parent | c32e261a1a363da829a58eb37696205c67110eb2 (diff) | |
download | llvm-4c7edb124086ada5d5667e8e87e5a697441ed0f5.tar.gz llvm-4c7edb124086ada5d5667e8e87e5a697441ed0f5.tar.bz2 llvm-4c7edb124086ada5d5667e8e87e5a697441ed0f5.tar.xz |
[LCG] Add support for building persistent and connected SCCs to the
LazyCallGraph. This is the start of the whole point of this different
abstraction, but it is just the initial bits. Here is a run-down of
what's going on here. I'm planning to incorporate some (or all) of this
into comments going forward, hopefully with better editing and wording.
=]
The crux of the problem with the traditional way of building SCCs is
that they are ephemeral. The new pass manager however really needs the
ability to associate analysis passes and results of analysis passes with
SCCs in order to expose these analysis passes to the SCC passes. Making
this work is kind-of the whole point of the new pass manager. =]
So, when we're building SCCs for the call graph, we actually want to
build persistent nodes that stick around and can be reasoned about
later. We'd also like the ability to walk the SCC graph in more complex
ways than just the traditional postorder traversal of the current CGSCC
walk. That means that in addition to being persistent, the SCCs need to
be connected into a useful graph structure.
However, we still want the SCCs to be formed lazily where possible.
These constraints are quite hard to satisfy with the SCC iterator. Also,
using that would bypass our ability to actually add data to the nodes of
the call graph to facilite implementing the Tarjan walk. So I've
re-implemented things in a more direct and embedded way. This
immediately makes it easy to get the persistence and connectivity
correct, and it also allows leveraging the existing nodes to simplify
the algorithm. I've worked somewhat to make this implementation more
closely follow the traditional paper's nomenclature and strategy,
although it is still a bit obtuse because it isn't recursive, using
an explicit stack and a tail call instead, and it is interruptable,
resuming each time we need another SCC.
The other tricky bit here, and what actually took almost all the time
and trials and errors I spent building this, is exactly *what* graph
structure to build for the SCCs. The naive thing to build is the call
graph in its newly acyclic form. I wrote about 4 versions of this which
did precisely this. Inevitably, when I experimented with them across
various use cases, they became incredibly awkward. It was all
implementable, but it felt like a complete wrong fit. Square peg, round
hole. There were two overriding aspects that pushed me in a different
direction:
1) We want to discover the SCC graph in a postorder fashion. That means
the root node will be the *last* node we find. Using the call-SCC DAG
as the graph structure of the SCCs results in an orphaned graph until
we discover a root.
2) We will eventually want to walk the SCC graph in parallel, exploring
distinct sub-graphs independently, and synchronizing at merge points.
This again is not helped by the call-SCC DAG structure.
The structure which, quite surprisingly, ended up being completely
natural to use is the *inverse* of the call-SCC DAG. We add the leaf
SCCs to the graph as "roots", and have edges to the caller SCCs. Once
I switched to building this structure, everything just fell into place
elegantly.
Aside from general cleanups (there are FIXMEs and too few comments
overall) that are still needed, the other missing piece of this is
support for iterating across levels of the SCC graph. These will become
useful for implementing #2, but they aren't an immediate priority.
Once SCCs are in good shape, I'll be working on adding mutation support
for incremental updates and adding the pass manager that this analysis
enables.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206581 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r-- | include/llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h | 118 |
1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h b/include/llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h index d22f2cf8db..bcd06c2a10 100644 --- a/include/llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h +++ b/include/llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h @@ -38,8 +38,10 @@ #include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h" #include "llvm/ADT/PointerUnion.h" #include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/SetVector.h" #include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h" #include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/iterator_range.h" #include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h" #include "llvm/IR/Function.h" #include "llvm/IR/Module.h" @@ -100,6 +102,7 @@ class raw_ostream; class LazyCallGraph { public: class Node; + class SCC; typedef SmallVector<PointerUnion<Function *, Node *>, 4> NodeVectorT; typedef SmallVectorImpl<PointerUnion<Function *, Node *>> NodeVectorImplT; @@ -173,9 +176,16 @@ public: /// a callee, and facilitate iteration of child nodes in the graph. class Node { friend class LazyCallGraph; + friend class LazyCallGraph::SCC; LazyCallGraph *G; Function &F; + + // We provide for the DFS numbering and Tarjan walk lowlink numbers to be + // stored directly within the node. + int DFSNumber; + int LowLink; + mutable NodeVectorT Callees; SmallPtrSet<Function *, 4> CalleeSet; @@ -201,6 +211,79 @@ public: bool operator!=(const Node &N) const { return !operator==(N); } }; + /// \brief An SCC of the call graph. + /// + /// This represents a Strongly Connected Component of the call graph as + /// a collection of call graph nodes. While the order of nodes in the SCC is + /// stable, it is not any particular order. + class SCC { + friend class LazyCallGraph; + friend class LazyCallGraph::Node; + + SmallSetVector<SCC *, 1> ParentSCCs; + SmallVector<Node *, 1> Nodes; + SmallPtrSet<Function *, 1> NodeSet; + + SCC() {} + + public: + typedef SmallVectorImpl<Node *>::const_iterator iterator; + + iterator begin() const { return Nodes.begin(); } + iterator end() const { return Nodes.end(); } + }; + + /// \brief A post-order depth-first SCC iterator over the call graph. + /// + /// This iterator triggers the Tarjan DFS-based formation of the SCC DAG for + /// the call graph, walking it lazily in depth-first post-order. That is, it + /// always visits SCCs for a callee prior to visiting the SCC for a caller + /// (when they are in different SCCs). + class postorder_scc_iterator + : public std::iterator<std::forward_iterator_tag, SCC *, ptrdiff_t, SCC *, + SCC *> { + friend class LazyCallGraph; + friend class LazyCallGraph::Node; + typedef std::iterator<std::forward_iterator_tag, SCC *, ptrdiff_t, + SCC *, SCC *> BaseT; + + /// \brief Nonce type to select the constructor for the end iterator. + struct IsAtEndT {}; + + LazyCallGraph *G; + SCC *C; + + // Build the begin iterator for a node. + postorder_scc_iterator(LazyCallGraph &G) : G(&G) { + C = G.getNextSCCInPostOrder(); + } + + // Build the end iterator for a node. This is selected purely by overload. + postorder_scc_iterator(LazyCallGraph &G, IsAtEndT /*Nonce*/) + : G(&G), C(nullptr) {} + + public: + bool operator==(const postorder_scc_iterator &Arg) { + return G == Arg.G && C == Arg.C; + } + bool operator!=(const postorder_scc_iterator &Arg) { + return !operator==(Arg); + } + + reference operator*() const { return C; } + pointer operator->() const { return operator*(); } + + postorder_scc_iterator &operator++() { + C = G->getNextSCCInPostOrder(); + return *this; + } + postorder_scc_iterator operator++(int) { + postorder_scc_iterator prev = *this; + ++*this; + return prev; + } + }; + /// \brief Construct a graph for the given module. /// /// This sets up the graph and computes all of the entry points of the graph. @@ -229,6 +312,18 @@ public: iterator begin() { return iterator(*this, EntryNodes); } iterator end() { return iterator(*this, EntryNodes, iterator::IsAtEndT()); } + postorder_scc_iterator postorder_scc_begin() { + return postorder_scc_iterator(*this); + } + postorder_scc_iterator postorder_scc_end() { + return postorder_scc_iterator(*this, postorder_scc_iterator::IsAtEndT()); + } + + iterator_range<postorder_scc_iterator> postorder_sccs() { + return iterator_range<postorder_scc_iterator>(postorder_scc_begin(), + postorder_scc_end()); + } + /// \brief Lookup a function in the graph which has already been scanned and /// added. Node *lookup(const Function &F) const { return NodeMap.lookup(&F); } @@ -259,12 +354,35 @@ private: /// \brief Set of the entry nodes to the graph. SmallPtrSet<Function *, 4> EntryNodeSet; + /// \brief Allocator that holds all the call graph SCCs. + SpecificBumpPtrAllocator<SCC> SCCBPA; + + /// \brief Maps Function -> SCC for fast lookup. + DenseMap<const Function *, SCC *> SCCMap; + + /// \brief The leaf SCCs of the graph. + /// + /// These are all of the SCCs which have no children. + SmallVector<SCC *, 4> LeafSCCs; + + /// \brief Stack of nodes not-yet-processed into SCCs. + SmallVector<std::pair<Node *, iterator>, 4> DFSStack; + + /// \brief Set of entry nodes not-yet-processed into SCCs. + SmallSetVector<Function *, 4> SCCEntryNodes; + + /// \brief Counter for the next DFS number to assign. + int NextDFSNumber; + /// \brief Helper to insert a new function, with an already looked-up entry in /// the NodeMap. Node *insertInto(Function &F, Node *&MappedN); /// \brief Helper to copy a node from another graph into this one. Node *copyInto(const Node &OtherN); + + /// \brief Retrieve the next node in the post-order SCC walk of the call graph. + SCC *getNextSCCInPostOrder(); }; // Provide GraphTraits specializations for call graphs. |