diff options
author | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> | 2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000 |
commit | 36b699f2b139a30a2dfa4448223d6985b55daa8a (patch) | |
tree | d6844c991f0c06de4b66a2615259607d8349e5b3 /lib/Analysis/IPA | |
parent | b033b03c23fb3ae066937b2ec09eb9d7a3f1d522 (diff) | |
download | llvm-36b699f2b139a30a2dfa4448223d6985b55daa8a.tar.gz llvm-36b699f2b139a30a2dfa4448223d6985b55daa8a.tar.bz2 llvm-36b699f2b139a30a2dfa4448223d6985b55daa8a.tar.xz |
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Analysis/IPA')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Analysis/IPA/GlobalsModRef.cpp | 27 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp | 5 |
2 files changed, 15 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/IPA/GlobalsModRef.cpp b/lib/Analysis/IPA/GlobalsModRef.cpp index dac9bd24a4..f4097e4631 100644 --- a/lib/Analysis/IPA/GlobalsModRef.cpp +++ b/lib/Analysis/IPA/GlobalsModRef.cpp @@ -252,33 +252,33 @@ bool GlobalsModRef::AnalyzeUsesOfPointer(Value *V, GlobalValue *OkayStoreDest) { if (!V->getType()->isPointerTy()) return true; - for (Value::use_iterator UI = V->use_begin(), E=V->use_end(); UI != E; ++UI) { - User *U = *UI; - if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(U)) { + for (Use &U : V->uses()) { + User *I = U.getUser(); + if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(I)) { Readers.push_back(LI->getParent()->getParent()); - } else if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(U)) { + } else if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(I)) { if (V == SI->getOperand(1)) { Writers.push_back(SI->getParent()->getParent()); } else if (SI->getOperand(1) != OkayStoreDest) { return true; // Storing the pointer } - } else if (Operator::getOpcode(U) == Instruction::GetElementPtr) { - if (AnalyzeUsesOfPointer(U, Readers, Writers)) + } else if (Operator::getOpcode(I) == Instruction::GetElementPtr) { + if (AnalyzeUsesOfPointer(I, Readers, Writers)) return true; - } else if (Operator::getOpcode(U) == Instruction::BitCast) { - if (AnalyzeUsesOfPointer(U, Readers, Writers, OkayStoreDest)) + } else if (Operator::getOpcode(I) == Instruction::BitCast) { + if (AnalyzeUsesOfPointer(I, Readers, Writers, OkayStoreDest)) return true; - } else if (CallSite CS = U) { + } else if (CallSite CS = I) { // Make sure that this is just the function being called, not that it is // passing into the function. - if (!CS.isCallee(UI)) { + if (!CS.isCallee(&U)) { // Detect calls to free. - if (isFreeCall(U, TLI)) + if (isFreeCall(I, TLI)) Writers.push_back(CS->getParent()->getParent()); else return true; // Argument of an unknown call. } - } else if (ICmpInst *ICI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(U)) { + } else if (ICmpInst *ICI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(I)) { if (!isa<ConstantPointerNull>(ICI->getOperand(1))) return true; // Allow comparison against null. } else { @@ -303,8 +303,7 @@ bool GlobalsModRef::AnalyzeIndirectGlobalMemory(GlobalValue *GV) { // Walk the user list of the global. If we find anything other than a direct // load or store, bail out. - for (Value::use_iterator I = GV->use_begin(), E = GV->use_end(); I != E; ++I){ - User *U = *I; + for (User *U : GV->users()) { if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(U)) { // The pointer loaded from the global can only be used in simple ways: // we allow addressing of it and loading storing to it. We do *not* allow diff --git a/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp b/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp index 62c717859c..d4ef2247e2 100644 --- a/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp +++ b/lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp @@ -1052,9 +1052,8 @@ bool CallAnalyzer::analyzeCall(CallSite CS) { Function *Caller = CS.getInstruction()->getParent()->getParent(); // Check if the caller function is recursive itself. - for (Value::use_iterator U = Caller->use_begin(), E = Caller->use_end(); - U != E; ++U) { - CallSite Site(cast<Value>(*U)); + for (User *U : Caller->users()) { + CallSite Site(U); if (!Site) continue; Instruction *I = Site.getInstruction(); |