summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Christopher <echristo@apple.com>2011-02-05 00:49:15 +0000
committerEric Christopher <echristo@apple.com>2011-02-05 00:49:15 +0000
commit4e8af6db184118638c21f713ad98e3292c6891c9 (patch)
tree4527fa0f07aef9b250bdbc195ff97edd97f13eb9 /lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp
parent66c357dbc44c3f3fe1b789f1ad581bd55f25dea4 (diff)
downloadllvm-4e8af6db184118638c21f713ad98e3292c6891c9.tar.gz
llvm-4e8af6db184118638c21f713ad98e3292c6891c9.tar.bz2
llvm-4e8af6db184118638c21f713ad98e3292c6891c9.tar.xz
Rewrite how the indirect call bonus is handled. This now works by:
a) Making it a per call site bonus for functions that we can move from indirect to direct calls. b) Reduces the bonus from 500 to 100 per call site. c) Subtracts the size of the possible newly inlineable call from the bonus to only add a bonus if we can inline a small function to devirtualize it. Also changes the bonus from a positive that's subtracted to a negative that's added. Fixes the remainder of rdar://8546196 by reducing the object file size after inlining by 84%. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp203
1 files changed, 125 insertions, 78 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp b/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp
index ccf89193c4..98a158ab26 100644
--- a/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp
+++ b/lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include "llvm/CallingConv.h"
#include "llvm/IntrinsicInst.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
+
using namespace llvm;
/// callIsSmall - If a call is likely to lower to a single target instruction,
@@ -298,22 +299,38 @@ int InlineCostAnalyzer::getSpecializationBonus(Function *Callee,
return Bonus;
}
+// ConstantFunctionBonus - Figure out how much of a bonus we can get for
+// possibly devirtualizing a function. We'll subtract the size of the function
+// we may wish to inline from the indirect call bonus providing a limit on
+// growth. Leave an upper limit of 0 for the bonus - we don't want to penalize
+// inlining because we decide we don't want to give a bonus for
+// devirtualizing.
+int InlineCostAnalyzer::ConstantFunctionBonus(CallSite CS, Constant *C) {
+
+ // This could just be NULL.
+ if (!C) return 0;
+
+ Function *F = dyn_cast<Function>(C);
+ if (!F) return 0;
+
+ int Bonus = InlineConstants::IndirectCallBonus + getInlineSize(CS, F);
+ return (Bonus > 0) ? 0 : Bonus;
+}
+
// CountBonusForConstant - Figure out an approximation for how much per-call
// performance boost we can expect if the specified value is constant.
-unsigned InlineCostAnalyzer::CountBonusForConstant(Value *V) {
+int InlineCostAnalyzer::CountBonusForConstant(Value *V, Constant *C) {
unsigned Bonus = 0;
- bool indirectCallBonus = false;
for (Value::use_iterator UI = V->use_begin(), E = V->use_end(); UI != E;++UI){
User *U = *UI;
if (CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(U)) {
// Turning an indirect call into a direct call is a BIG win
if (CI->getCalledValue() == V)
- indirectCallBonus = true;
- }
- else if (InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(U)) {
+ Bonus += ConstantFunctionBonus(CallSite(CI), C);
+ } else if (InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(U)) {
// Turning an indirect call into a direct call is a BIG win
if (II->getCalledValue() == V)
- indirectCallBonus = true;
+ Bonus += ConstantFunctionBonus(CallSite(CI), C);
}
// FIXME: Eliminating conditional branches and switches should
// also yield a per-call performance boost.
@@ -345,13 +362,106 @@ unsigned InlineCostAnalyzer::CountBonusForConstant(Value *V) {
}
}
- // FIXME: The only reason we're applying the bonus once is while it's great
- // to devirtualize calls the magnitude of the bonus x number of call sites
- // can lead to a huge code explosion when we prefer to inline 1000 instruction
- // functions that have 10 call sites. This should be made a function of the
- // estimated inline penalty/benefit + the indirect call bonus.
- if (indirectCallBonus) Bonus += InlineConstants::IndirectCallBonus;
+ return Bonus;
+}
+
+int InlineCostAnalyzer::getInlineSize(CallSite CS, Function *Callee) {
+ // Get information about the callee.
+ FunctionInfo *CalleeFI = &CachedFunctionInfo[Callee];
+
+ // If we haven't calculated this information yet, do so now.
+ if (CalleeFI->Metrics.NumBlocks == 0)
+ CalleeFI->analyzeFunction(Callee);
+
+ // InlineCost - This value measures how good of an inline candidate this call
+ // site is to inline. A lower inline cost make is more likely for the call to
+ // be inlined. This value may go negative.
+ //
+ int InlineCost = 0;
+
+ // Compute any size reductions we can expect due to arguments being passed into
+ // the function.
+ //
+ unsigned ArgNo = 0;
+ CallSite::arg_iterator I = CS.arg_begin();
+ for (Function::arg_iterator FI = Callee->arg_begin(), FE = Callee->arg_end();
+ FI != FE; ++I, ++FI, ++ArgNo) {
+
+ // If an alloca is passed in, inlining this function is likely to allow
+ // significant future optimization possibilities (like scalar promotion, and
+ // scalarization), so encourage the inlining of the function.
+ //
+ if (isa<AllocaInst>(I))
+ InlineCost -= CalleeFI->ArgumentWeights[ArgNo].AllocaWeight;
+
+ // If this is a constant being passed into the function, use the argument
+ // weights calculated for the callee to determine how much will be folded
+ // away with this information.
+ else if (isa<Constant>(I))
+ InlineCost -= CalleeFI->ArgumentWeights[ArgNo].ConstantWeight;
+ }
+
+ // Each argument passed in has a cost at both the caller and the callee
+ // sides. Measurements show that each argument costs about the same as an
+ // instruction.
+ InlineCost -= (CS.arg_size() * InlineConstants::InstrCost);
+
+ // Now that we have considered all of the factors that make the call site more
+ // likely to be inlined, look at factors that make us not want to inline it.
+
+ // Calls usually take a long time, so they make the inlining gain smaller.
+ InlineCost += CalleeFI->Metrics.NumCalls * InlineConstants::CallPenalty;
+
+ // Look at the size of the callee. Each instruction counts as 5.
+ InlineCost += CalleeFI->Metrics.NumInsts*InlineConstants::InstrCost;
+
+ return InlineCost;
+}
+
+int InlineCostAnalyzer::getInlineBonuses(CallSite CS, Function *Callee) {
+ // Get information about the callee.
+ FunctionInfo *CalleeFI = &CachedFunctionInfo[Callee];
+
+ // If we haven't calculated this information yet, do so now.
+ if (CalleeFI->Metrics.NumBlocks == 0)
+ CalleeFI->analyzeFunction(Callee);
+
+ bool isDirectCall = CS.getCalledFunction() == Callee;
+ Instruction *TheCall = CS.getInstruction();
+ int Bonus = 0;
+
+ // If there is only one call of the function, and it has internal linkage,
+ // make it almost guaranteed to be inlined.
+ //
+ if (Callee->hasLocalLinkage() && Callee->hasOneUse() && isDirectCall)
+ Bonus += InlineConstants::LastCallToStaticBonus;
+
+ // If the instruction after the call, or if the normal destination of the
+ // invoke is an unreachable instruction, the function is noreturn. As such,
+ // there is little point in inlining this.
+ if (InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(TheCall)) {
+ if (isa<UnreachableInst>(II->getNormalDest()->begin()))
+ Bonus += InlineConstants::NoreturnPenalty;
+ } else if (isa<UnreachableInst>(++BasicBlock::iterator(TheCall)))
+ Bonus += InlineConstants::NoreturnPenalty;
+
+ // If this function uses the coldcc calling convention, prefer not to inline
+ // it.
+ if (Callee->getCallingConv() == CallingConv::Cold)
+ Bonus += InlineConstants::ColdccPenalty;
+ // Add to the inline quality for properties that make the call valuable to
+ // inline. This includes factors that indicate that the result of inlining
+ // the function will be optimizable. Currently this just looks at arguments
+ // passed into the function.
+ //
+ CallSite::arg_iterator I = CS.arg_begin();
+ for (Function::arg_iterator FI = Callee->arg_begin(), FE = Callee->arg_end();
+ FI != FE; ++I, ++FI)
+ // Compute any constant bonus due to inlining we want to give here.
+ if (isa<Constant>(I))
+ Bonus += CountBonusForConstant(FI, cast<Constant>(I));
+
return Bonus;
}
@@ -368,7 +478,6 @@ InlineCost InlineCostAnalyzer::getInlineCost(CallSite CS,
SmallPtrSet<const Function*, 16> &NeverInline) {
Instruction *TheCall = CS.getInstruction();
Function *Caller = TheCall->getParent()->getParent();
- bool isDirectCall = CS.getCalledFunction() == Callee;
// Don't inline functions which can be redefined at link-time to mean
// something else. Don't inline functions marked noinline or call sites
@@ -418,72 +527,10 @@ InlineCost InlineCostAnalyzer::getInlineCost(CallSite CS,
// InlineCost - This value measures how good of an inline candidate this call
// site is to inline. A lower inline cost make is more likely for the call to
- // be inlined. This value may go negative.
- //
- int InlineCost = 0;
-
- // Add to the inline quality for properties that make the call valuable to
- // inline. This includes factors that indicate that the result of inlining
- // the function will be optimizable. Currently this just looks at arguments
- // passed into the function.
- //
- unsigned ArgNo = 0;
- CallSite::arg_iterator I = CS.arg_begin();
- for (Function::arg_iterator FI = Callee->arg_begin(), FE = Callee->arg_end();
- FI != FE; ++I, ++FI, ++ArgNo) {
-
- // If an alloca is passed in, inlining this function is likely to allow
- // significant future optimization possibilities (like scalar promotion, and
- // scalarization), so encourage the inlining of the function.
- //
- if (isa<AllocaInst>(I))
- InlineCost -= CalleeFI->ArgumentWeights[ArgNo].AllocaWeight;
-
- // If this is a constant being passed into the function, use the argument
- // weights calculated for the callee to determine how much will be folded
- // away with this information.
- else if (isa<Constant>(I)) {
- InlineCost -= CalleeFI->ArgumentWeights[ArgNo].ConstantWeight;
-
- // Compute any constant bonus due to inlining we want to give here.
- InlineCost -= CountBonusForConstant(FI);
- }
- }
-
- // Each argument passed in has a cost at both the caller and the callee
- // sides. Measurements show that each argument costs about the same as an
- // instruction.
- InlineCost -= (CS.arg_size() * InlineConstants::InstrCost);
-
- // If there is only one call of the function, and it has internal linkage,
- // make it almost guaranteed to be inlined.
+ // be inlined. This value may go negative due to the fact that bonuses
+ // are negative numbers.
//
- if (Callee->hasLocalLinkage() && Callee->hasOneUse() && isDirectCall)
- InlineCost += InlineConstants::LastCallToStaticBonus;
-
- // Now that we have considered all of the factors that make the call site more
- // likely to be inlined, look at factors that make us not want to inline it.
-
- // If the instruction after the call, or if the normal destination of the
- // invoke is an unreachable instruction, the function is noreturn. As such,
- // there is little point in inlining this.
- if (InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(TheCall)) {
- if (isa<UnreachableInst>(II->getNormalDest()->begin()))
- InlineCost += InlineConstants::NoreturnPenalty;
- } else if (isa<UnreachableInst>(++BasicBlock::iterator(TheCall)))
- InlineCost += InlineConstants::NoreturnPenalty;
-
- // If this function uses the coldcc calling convention, prefer not to inline
- // it.
- if (Callee->getCallingConv() == CallingConv::Cold)
- InlineCost += InlineConstants::ColdccPenalty;
-
- // Calls usually take a long time, so they make the inlining gain smaller.
- InlineCost += CalleeFI->Metrics.NumCalls * InlineConstants::CallPenalty;
-
- // Look at the size of the callee. Each instruction counts as 5.
- InlineCost += CalleeFI->Metrics.NumInsts*InlineConstants::InstrCost;
-
+ int InlineCost = getInlineSize(CS, Callee) + getInlineBonuses(CS, Callee);
return llvm::InlineCost::get(InlineCost);
}