summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Bitcode
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000
committerChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000
commit36b699f2b139a30a2dfa4448223d6985b55daa8a (patch)
treed6844c991f0c06de4b66a2615259607d8349e5b3 /lib/Bitcode
parentb033b03c23fb3ae066937b2ec09eb9d7a3f1d522 (diff)
downloadllvm-36b699f2b139a30a2dfa4448223d6985b55daa8a.tar.gz
llvm-36b699f2b139a30a2dfa4448223d6985b55daa8a.tar.bz2
llvm-36b699f2b139a30a2dfa4448223d6985b55daa8a.tar.xz
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.
This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Bitcode')
-rw-r--r--lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp10
-rw-r--r--lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp11
-rw-r--r--lib/Bitcode/Writer/ValueEnumerator.cpp9
3 files changed, 11 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp b/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp
index 527fd25398..5e358d9cc5 100644
--- a/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp
+++ b/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ void BitcodeReaderValueList::ResolveConstantForwardRefs() {
// new value. If they reference more than one placeholder, update them all
// at once.
while (!Placeholder->use_empty()) {
- Value::use_iterator UI = Placeholder->use_begin();
+ auto UI = Placeholder->user_begin();
User *U = *UI;
// If the using object isn't uniqued, just update the operands. This
@@ -3116,8 +3116,8 @@ error_code BitcodeReader::Materialize(GlobalValue *GV) {
for (UpgradedIntrinsicMap::iterator I = UpgradedIntrinsics.begin(),
E = UpgradedIntrinsics.end(); I != E; ++I) {
if (I->first != I->second) {
- for (Value::use_iterator UI = I->first->use_begin(),
- UE = I->first->use_end(); UI != UE; ) {
+ for (auto UI = I->first->user_begin(), UE = I->first->user_end();
+ UI != UE;) {
if (CallInst* CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(*UI++))
UpgradeIntrinsicCall(CI, I->second);
}
@@ -3172,8 +3172,8 @@ error_code BitcodeReader::MaterializeModule(Module *M) {
for (std::vector<std::pair<Function*, Function*> >::iterator I =
UpgradedIntrinsics.begin(), E = UpgradedIntrinsics.end(); I != E; ++I) {
if (I->first != I->second) {
- for (Value::use_iterator UI = I->first->use_begin(),
- UE = I->first->use_end(); UI != UE; ) {
+ for (auto UI = I->first->user_begin(), UE = I->first->user_end();
+ UI != UE;) {
if (CallInst* CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(*UI++))
UpgradeIntrinsicCall(CI, I->second);
}
diff --git a/lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp b/lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp
index 718cd12389..8a09507c29 100644
--- a/lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp
+++ b/lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp
@@ -1807,17 +1807,10 @@ static void WriteUseList(const Value *V, const ValueEnumerator &VE,
return;
// Make a copy of the in-memory use-list for sorting.
- unsigned UseListSize = std::distance(V->use_begin(), V->use_end());
- SmallVector<const User*, 8> UseList;
- UseList.reserve(UseListSize);
- for (Value::const_use_iterator I = V->use_begin(), E = V->use_end();
- I != E; ++I) {
- const User *U = *I;
- UseList.push_back(U);
- }
+ SmallVector<const User*, 8> UserList(V->user_begin(), V->user_end());
// Sort the copy based on the order read by the BitcodeReader.
- std::sort(UseList.begin(), UseList.end(), bitcodereader_order);
+ std::sort(UserList.begin(), UserList.end(), bitcodereader_order);
// TODO: Generate a diff between the BitcodeWriter in-memory use-list and the
// sorted list (i.e., the expected BitcodeReader in-memory use-list).
diff --git a/lib/Bitcode/Writer/ValueEnumerator.cpp b/lib/Bitcode/Writer/ValueEnumerator.cpp
index 9e7b12a93d..8531e76be1 100644
--- a/lib/Bitcode/Writer/ValueEnumerator.cpp
+++ b/lib/Bitcode/Writer/ValueEnumerator.cpp
@@ -159,12 +159,11 @@ void ValueEnumerator::print(raw_ostream &OS, const ValueMapType &Map,
V->dump();
OS << " Uses(" << std::distance(V->use_begin(),V->use_end()) << "):";
- for (Value::const_use_iterator UI = V->use_begin(), UE = V->use_end();
- UI != UE; ++UI) {
- if (UI != V->use_begin())
+ for (const Use &U : V->uses()) {
+ if (&U != &*V->use_begin())
OS << ",";
- if((*UI)->hasName())
- OS << " " << (*UI)->getName();
+ if(U->hasName())
+ OS << " " << U->getName();
else
OS << " [null]";