Fix tail merging to assign the (more) correct BasicBlock when splitting.

This makes it possible to write unit tests that are less susceptible
to minor code motion, particularly copy placement. block-placement.ll
covers this case with -pre-RA-sched=source which will soon be
default. One incorrectly named block is already fixed, but without
this fix, enabling new coalescing and scheduling would cause more
failures.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@184680 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp
index bf0ea5a125..9cd4208d64 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp
@@ -406,7 +406,8 @@ void BranchFolder::ReplaceTailWithBranchTo(MachineBasicBlock::iterator OldInst,
 /// MBB so that the part before the iterator falls into the part starting at the
 /// iterator.  This returns the new MBB.
 MachineBasicBlock *BranchFolder::SplitMBBAt(MachineBasicBlock &CurMBB,
-                                            MachineBasicBlock::iterator BBI1) {
+                                            MachineBasicBlock::iterator BBI1,
+                                            const BasicBlock *BB) {
   if (!TII->isLegalToSplitMBBAt(CurMBB, BBI1))
     return 0;
 
@@ -414,7 +415,7 @@ MachineBasicBlock *BranchFolder::SplitMBBAt(MachineBasicBlock &CurMBB,
 
   // Create the fall-through block.
   MachineFunction::iterator MBBI = &CurMBB;
-  MachineBasicBlock *NewMBB =MF.CreateMachineBasicBlock(CurMBB.getBasicBlock());
+  MachineBasicBlock *NewMBB =MF.CreateMachineBasicBlock(BB);
   CurMBB.getParent()->insert(++MBBI, NewMBB);
 
   // Move all the successors of this block to the specified block.
@@ -647,6 +648,7 @@ void BranchFolder::RemoveBlocksWithHash(unsigned CurHash,
 /// CreateCommonTailOnlyBlock - None of the blocks to be tail-merged consist
 /// only of the common tail.  Create a block that does by splitting one.
 bool BranchFolder::CreateCommonTailOnlyBlock(MachineBasicBlock *&PredBB,
+                                             MachineBasicBlock *SuccBB,
                                              unsigned maxCommonTailLength,
                                              unsigned &commonTailIndex) {
   commonTailIndex = 0;
@@ -676,7 +678,12 @@ bool BranchFolder::CreateCommonTailOnlyBlock(MachineBasicBlock *&PredBB,
   DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nSplitting BB#" << MBB->getNumber() << ", size "
                << maxCommonTailLength);
 
-  MachineBasicBlock *newMBB = SplitMBBAt(*MBB, BBI);
+  // If the split block unconditionally falls-thru to SuccBB, it will be
+  // merged. In control flow terms it should then take SuccBB's name. e.g. If
+  // SuccBB is an inner loop, the common tail is still part of the inner loop.
+  const BasicBlock *BB = (SuccBB && MBB->succ_size() == 1) ?
+    SuccBB->getBasicBlock() : MBB->getBasicBlock();
+  MachineBasicBlock *newMBB = SplitMBBAt(*MBB, BBI, BB);
   if (!newMBB) {
     DEBUG(dbgs() << "... failed!");
     return false;
@@ -784,7 +791,7 @@ bool BranchFolder::TryTailMergeBlocks(MachineBasicBlock *SuccBB,
          !SameTails[commonTailIndex].tailIsWholeBlock())) {
       // None of the blocks consist entirely of the common tail.
       // Split a block so that one does.
-      if (!CreateCommonTailOnlyBlock(PredBB,
+      if (!CreateCommonTailOnlyBlock(PredBB, SuccBB,
                                      maxCommonTailLength, commonTailIndex)) {
         RemoveBlocksWithHash(CurHash, SuccBB, PredBB);
         continue;