summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/CodeGen/LiveRangeCalc.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund@2pi.dk>2011-09-13 01:34:21 +0000
committerJakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund@2pi.dk>2011-09-13 01:34:21 +0000
commitb5a457c4cbc71db6ae313ef1bf8eadac65767ab0 (patch)
treeaad27894a39c0885259b2161e48183b6507c8bdf /lib/CodeGen/LiveRangeCalc.cpp
parent1582e7f1e255c19595f82cb447e52869196dec58 (diff)
downloadllvm-b5a457c4cbc71db6ae313ef1bf8eadac65767ab0.tar.gz
llvm-b5a457c4cbc71db6ae313ef1bf8eadac65767ab0.tar.bz2
llvm-b5a457c4cbc71db6ae313ef1bf8eadac65767ab0.tar.xz
Extract live range calculations from SplitKit.
SplitKit will soon need two copies of these data structures, and the algorithms will also be useful when LiveIntervalAnalysis becomes independent of LiveVariables. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139572 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/LiveRangeCalc.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/CodeGen/LiveRangeCalc.cpp271
1 files changed, 271 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/LiveRangeCalc.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/LiveRangeCalc.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..21eaa15d01
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/LiveRangeCalc.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
+//===---- LiveRangeCalc.cpp - Calculate live ranges -----------------------===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
+// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Implementation of the LiveRangeCalc class.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "regalloc"
+#include "LiveRangeCalc.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineDominators.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+
+void LiveRangeCalc::reset(const MachineFunction *MF) {
+ unsigned N = MF->getNumBlockIDs();
+ Seen.clear();
+ Seen.resize(N);
+ LiveOut.resize(N);
+ LiveIn.clear();
+}
+
+
+// Transfer information from the LiveIn vector to the live ranges.
+void LiveRangeCalc::updateLiveIns(VNInfo *OverrideVNI, SlotIndexes *Indexes) {
+ for (SmallVectorImpl<LiveInBlock>::iterator I = LiveIn.begin(),
+ E = LiveIn.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ if (!I->DomNode)
+ continue;
+ MachineBasicBlock *MBB = I->DomNode->getBlock();
+
+ VNInfo *VNI = OverrideVNI ? OverrideVNI : I->Value;
+ assert(VNI && "No live-in value found");
+
+ SlotIndex Start, End;
+ tie(Start, End) = Indexes->getMBBRange(MBB);
+
+ if (I->Kill.isValid())
+ I->LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, I->Kill, VNI));
+ else {
+ I->LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, End, VNI));
+ // The value is live-through, update LiveOut as well. Defer the Domtree
+ // lookup until it is needed.
+ assert(Seen.test(MBB->getNumber()));
+ LiveOut[MBB] = LiveOutPair(VNI, 0);
+ }
+ }
+ LiveIn.clear();
+}
+
+
+void LiveRangeCalc::extend(LiveInterval *LI,
+ SlotIndex Kill,
+ SlotIndexes *Indexes,
+ MachineDominatorTree *DomTree,
+ VNInfo::Allocator *Alloc) {
+ assert(LI && "Missing live range");
+ assert(Kill.isValid() && "Invalid SlotIndex");
+ assert(Indexes && "Missing SlotIndexes");
+ assert(DomTree && "Missing dominator tree");
+ SlotIndex LastUse = Kill.getPrevSlot();
+
+ MachineBasicBlock *KillMBB = Indexes->getMBBFromIndex(LastUse);
+ assert(Kill && "No MBB at Kill");
+
+ // Is there a def in the same MBB we can extend?
+ if (LI->extendInBlock(Indexes->getMBBStartIdx(KillMBB), LastUse))
+ return;
+
+ // Find the single reaching def, or determine if Kill is jointly dominated by
+ // multiple values, and we may need to create even more phi-defs to preserve
+ // VNInfo SSA form. Perform a search for all predecessor blocks where we
+ // know the dominating VNInfo.
+ VNInfo *VNI = findReachingDefs(LI, KillMBB, Kill, Indexes, DomTree);
+
+ // When there were multiple different values, we may need new PHIs.
+ if (!VNI)
+ updateSSA(Indexes, DomTree, Alloc);
+
+ updateLiveIns(VNI, Indexes);
+}
+
+
+// This function is called by a client after using the low-level API to add
+// live-out and live-in blocks. The unique value optimization is not
+// available, SplitEditor::transferValues handles that case directly anyway.
+void LiveRangeCalc::calculateValues(SlotIndexes *Indexes,
+ MachineDominatorTree *DomTree,
+ VNInfo::Allocator *Alloc) {
+ assert(Indexes && "Missing SlotIndexes");
+ assert(DomTree && "Missing dominator tree");
+ updateSSA(Indexes, DomTree, Alloc);
+ updateLiveIns(0, Indexes);
+}
+
+
+VNInfo *LiveRangeCalc::findReachingDefs(LiveInterval *LI,
+ MachineBasicBlock *KillMBB,
+ SlotIndex Kill,
+ SlotIndexes *Indexes,
+ MachineDominatorTree *DomTree) {
+ // Blocks where LI should be live-in.
+ SmallVector<MachineBasicBlock*, 16> WorkList(1, KillMBB);
+
+ // Remember if we have seen more than one value.
+ bool UniqueVNI = true;
+ VNInfo *TheVNI = 0;
+
+ // Using Seen as a visited set, perform a BFS for all reaching defs.
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i != WorkList.size(); ++i) {
+ MachineBasicBlock *MBB = WorkList[i];
+ assert(!MBB->pred_empty() && "Value live-in to entry block?");
+ for (MachineBasicBlock::pred_iterator PI = MBB->pred_begin(),
+ PE = MBB->pred_end(); PI != PE; ++PI) {
+ MachineBasicBlock *Pred = *PI;
+
+ // Is this a known live-out block?
+ if (Seen.test(Pred->getNumber())) {
+ if (VNInfo *VNI = LiveOut[Pred].first) {
+ if (TheVNI && TheVNI != VNI)
+ UniqueVNI = false;
+ TheVNI = VNI;
+ }
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ SlotIndex Start, End;
+ tie(Start, End) = Indexes->getMBBRange(Pred);
+
+ // First time we see Pred. Try to determine the live-out value, but set
+ // it as null if Pred is live-through with an unknown value.
+ VNInfo *VNI = LI->extendInBlock(Start, End.getPrevSlot());
+ setLiveOutValue(Pred, VNI);
+ if (VNI) {
+ if (TheVNI && TheVNI != VNI)
+ UniqueVNI = false;
+ TheVNI = VNI;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ // No, we need a live-in value for Pred as well
+ if (Pred != KillMBB)
+ WorkList.push_back(Pred);
+ else
+ // Loopback to KillMBB, so value is really live through.
+ Kill = SlotIndex();
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Transfer WorkList to LiveInBlocks in reverse order.
+ // This ordering works best with updateSSA().
+ LiveIn.clear();
+ LiveIn.reserve(WorkList.size());
+ while(!WorkList.empty())
+ addLiveInBlock(LI, DomTree->getNode(WorkList.pop_back_val()));
+
+ // The kill block may not be live-through.
+ assert(LiveIn.back().DomNode->getBlock() == KillMBB);
+ LiveIn.back().Kill = Kill;
+
+ return UniqueVNI ? TheVNI : 0;
+}
+
+
+// This is essentially the same iterative algorithm that SSAUpdater uses,
+// except we already have a dominator tree, so we don't have to recompute it.
+void LiveRangeCalc::updateSSA(SlotIndexes *Indexes,
+ MachineDominatorTree *DomTree,
+ VNInfo::Allocator *Alloc) {
+ assert(Indexes && "Missing SlotIndexes");
+ assert(DomTree && "Missing dominator tree");
+
+ // Interate until convergence.
+ unsigned Changes;
+ do {
+ Changes = 0;
+ // Propagate live-out values down the dominator tree, inserting phi-defs
+ // when necessary.
+ for (SmallVectorImpl<LiveInBlock>::iterator I = LiveIn.begin(),
+ E = LiveIn.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ MachineDomTreeNode *Node = I->DomNode;
+ // Skip block if the live-in value has already been determined.
+ if (!Node)
+ continue;
+ MachineBasicBlock *MBB = Node->getBlock();
+ MachineDomTreeNode *IDom = Node->getIDom();
+ LiveOutPair IDomValue;
+
+ // We need a live-in value to a block with no immediate dominator?
+ // This is probably an unreachable block that has survived somehow.
+ bool needPHI = !IDom || !Seen.test(IDom->getBlock()->getNumber());
+
+ // IDom dominates all of our predecessors, but it may not be their
+ // immediate dominator. Check if any of them have live-out values that are
+ // properly dominated by IDom. If so, we need a phi-def here.
+ if (!needPHI) {
+ IDomValue = LiveOut[IDom->getBlock()];
+
+ // Cache the DomTree node that defined the value.
+ if (IDomValue.first && !IDomValue.second)
+ LiveOut[IDom->getBlock()].second = IDomValue.second =
+ DomTree->getNode(Indexes->getMBBFromIndex(IDomValue.first->def));
+
+ for (MachineBasicBlock::pred_iterator PI = MBB->pred_begin(),
+ PE = MBB->pred_end(); PI != PE; ++PI) {
+ LiveOutPair &Value = LiveOut[*PI];
+ if (!Value.first || Value.first == IDomValue.first)
+ continue;
+
+ // Cache the DomTree node that defined the value.
+ if (!Value.second)
+ Value.second =
+ DomTree->getNode(Indexes->getMBBFromIndex(Value.first->def));
+
+ // This predecessor is carrying something other than IDomValue.
+ // It could be because IDomValue hasn't propagated yet, or it could be
+ // because MBB is in the dominance frontier of that value.
+ if (DomTree->dominates(IDom, Value.second)) {
+ needPHI = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // The value may be live-through even if Kill is set, as can happen when
+ // we are called from extendRange. In that case LiveOutSeen is true, and
+ // LiveOut indicates a foreign or missing value.
+ LiveOutPair &LOP = LiveOut[MBB];
+
+ // Create a phi-def if required.
+ if (needPHI) {
+ ++Changes;
+ assert(Alloc && "Need VNInfo allocator to create PHI-defs");
+ SlotIndex Start, End;
+ tie(Start, End) = Indexes->getMBBRange(MBB);
+ VNInfo *VNI = I->LI->getNextValue(Start, 0, *Alloc);
+ VNI->setIsPHIDef(true);
+ I->Value = VNI;
+ // This block is done, we know the final value.
+ I->DomNode = 0;
+
+ // Add liveness since updateLiveIns now skips this node.
+ if (I->Kill.isValid())
+ I->LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, I->Kill, VNI));
+ else {
+ I->LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, End, VNI));
+ LOP = LiveOutPair(VNI, Node);
+ }
+ } else if (IDomValue.first) {
+ // No phi-def here. Remember incoming value.
+ I->Value = IDomValue.first;
+
+ // If the IDomValue is killed in the block, don't propagate through.
+ if (I->Kill.isValid())
+ continue;
+
+ // Propagate IDomValue if it isn't killed:
+ // MBB is live-out and doesn't define its own value.
+ if (LOP.first == IDomValue.first)
+ continue;
+ ++Changes;
+ LOP = IDomValue;
+ }
+ }
+ } while (Changes);
+}