summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJim Grosbach <grosbach@apple.com>2010-08-26 22:42:12 +0000
committerJim Grosbach <grosbach@apple.com>2010-08-26 22:42:12 +0000
commit700f5df518452162de7dda7461917f88e8f4c56e (patch)
tree0d2a3804c48916c2c6de19fe21cc53fe1f726661 /lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp
parent98b3d3793c6f2bd99641b6161dec9571d49240f7 (diff)
downloadllvm-700f5df518452162de7dda7461917f88e8f4c56e.tar.gz
llvm-700f5df518452162de7dda7461917f88e8f4c56e.tar.bz2
llvm-700f5df518452162de7dda7461917f88e8f4c56e.tar.xz
Remove the now obsolete frame index virtual re-use algorithm from PEI. Pre-RA
virtual base registers handle this function, and more. A bit more cleanup to do on the interface to eliminateFrameIndex() after this. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@112237 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp157
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 148 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp
index 734bf63252..66138f6782 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp
@@ -793,38 +793,6 @@ void PEI::replaceFrameIndices(MachineFunction &Fn) {
}
}
-/// findLastUseReg - find the killing use of the specified register within
-/// the instruciton range. Return the operand number of the kill in Operand.
-static MachineBasicBlock::iterator
-findLastUseReg(MachineBasicBlock::iterator I, MachineBasicBlock::iterator ME,
- unsigned Reg) {
- // Scan forward to find the last use of this virtual register
- for (++I; I != ME; ++I) {
- MachineInstr *MI = I;
- bool isDefInsn = false;
- bool isKillInsn = false;
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i)
- if (MI->getOperand(i).isReg()) {
- unsigned OpReg = MI->getOperand(i).getReg();
- if (OpReg == 0 || !TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(OpReg))
- continue;
- assert (OpReg == Reg
- && "overlapping use of scavenged index register!");
- // If this is the killing use, we have a candidate.
- if (MI->getOperand(i).isKill())
- isKillInsn = true;
- else if (MI->getOperand(i).isDef())
- isDefInsn = true;
- }
- if (isKillInsn && !isDefInsn)
- return I;
- }
- // If we hit the end of the basic block, there was no kill of
- // the virtual register, which is wrong.
- assert (0 && "scavenged index register never killed!");
- return ME;
-}
-
/// scavengeFrameVirtualRegs - Replace all frame index virtual registers
/// with physical registers. Use the register scavenger to find an
/// appropriate register to use.
@@ -834,27 +802,14 @@ void PEI::scavengeFrameVirtualRegs(MachineFunction &Fn) {
E = Fn.end(); BB != E; ++BB) {
RS->enterBasicBlock(BB);
- // FIXME: The logic flow in this function is still too convoluted.
- // It needs a cleanup refactoring. Do that in preparation for tracking
- // more than one scratch register value and using ranges to find
- // available scratch registers.
- unsigned CurrentVirtReg = 0;
- unsigned CurrentScratchReg = 0;
- bool havePrevValue = false;
- TargetRegisterInfo::FrameIndexValue PrevValue(0,0);
- TargetRegisterInfo::FrameIndexValue Value(0,0);
- MachineInstr *PrevLastUseMI = NULL;
- unsigned PrevLastUseOp = 0;
- bool trackingCurrentValue = false;
+ unsigned VirtReg = 0;
+ unsigned ScratchReg = 0;
int SPAdj = 0;
// The instruction stream may change in the loop, so check BB->end()
// directly.
for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(); I != BB->end(); ) {
MachineInstr *MI = I;
- bool isDefInsn = false;
- bool isKillInsn = false;
- bool clobbersScratchReg = false;
bool DoIncr = true;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
if (MI->getOperand(i).isReg()) {
@@ -862,124 +817,30 @@ void PEI::scavengeFrameVirtualRegs(MachineFunction &Fn) {
unsigned Reg = MO.getReg();
if (Reg == 0)
continue;
- if (!TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg)) {
- // If we have a previous scratch reg, check and see if anything
- // here kills whatever value is in there.
- if (Reg == CurrentScratchReg) {
- if (MO.isUse()) {
- // Two-address operands implicitly kill
- if (MO.isKill() || MI->isRegTiedToDefOperand(i))
- clobbersScratchReg = true;
- } else {
- assert (MO.isDef());
- clobbersScratchReg = true;
- }
- }
+ if (!TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg))
continue;
- }
- ++NumVirtualFrameRegs;
- // If this is a def, remember that this insn defines the value.
- // This lets us properly consider insns which re-use the scratch
- // register, such as r2 = sub r2, #imm, in the middle of the
- // scratch range.
- if (MO.isDef())
- isDefInsn = true;
+ ++NumVirtualFrameRegs;
// Have we already allocated a scratch register for this virtual?
- if (Reg != CurrentVirtReg) {
+ if (Reg != VirtReg) {
// When we first encounter a new virtual register, it
// must be a definition.
assert(MI->getOperand(i).isDef() &&
"frame index virtual missing def!");
- // We can't have nested virtual register live ranges because
- // there's only a guarantee of one scavenged register at a time.
- assert (CurrentVirtReg == 0 &&
- "overlapping frame index virtual registers!");
-
- // If the target gave us information about what's in the register,
- // we can use that to re-use scratch regs.
- DenseMap<unsigned, FrameConstantEntry>::iterator Entry =
- FrameConstantRegMap.find(Reg);
- trackingCurrentValue = Entry != FrameConstantRegMap.end();
- if (trackingCurrentValue) {
- SPAdj = (*Entry).second.second;
- Value = (*Entry).second.first;
- } else {
- SPAdj = 0;
- Value.first = 0;
- Value.second = 0;
- }
-
- // If the scratch register from the last allocation is still
- // available, see if the value matches. If it does, just re-use it.
- if (trackingCurrentValue && havePrevValue && PrevValue == Value) {
- // FIXME: This assumes that the instructions in the live range
- // for the virtual register are exclusively for the purpose
- // of populating the value in the register. That's reasonable
- // for these frame index registers, but it's still a very, very
- // strong assumption. rdar://7322732. Better would be to
- // explicitly check each instruction in the range for references
- // to the virtual register. Only delete those insns that
- // touch the virtual register.
-
- // Find the last use of the new virtual register. Remove all
- // instruction between here and there, and update the current
- // instruction to reference the last use insn instead.
- MachineBasicBlock::iterator LastUseMI =
- findLastUseReg(I, BB->end(), Reg);
-
- // Remove all instructions up 'til the last use, since they're
- // just calculating the value we already have.
- BB->erase(I, LastUseMI);
- I = LastUseMI;
-
- // Extend the live range of the scratch register
- PrevLastUseMI->getOperand(PrevLastUseOp).setIsKill(false);
- RS->setUsed(CurrentScratchReg);
- CurrentVirtReg = Reg;
-
- // We deleted the instruction we were scanning the operands of.
- // Jump back to the instruction iterator loop. Don't increment
- // past this instruction since we updated the iterator already.
- DoIncr = false;
- break;
- }
-
// Scavenge a new scratch register
- CurrentVirtReg = Reg;
+ VirtReg = Reg;
const TargetRegisterClass *RC = Fn.getRegInfo().getRegClass(Reg);
- CurrentScratchReg = RS->scavengeRegister(RC, I, SPAdj);
- PrevValue = Value;
+ ScratchReg = RS->scavengeRegister(RC, I, SPAdj);
++NumScavengedRegs;
}
// replace this reference to the virtual register with the
// scratch register.
- assert (CurrentScratchReg && "Missing scratch register!");
- MI->getOperand(i).setReg(CurrentScratchReg);
+ assert (ScratchReg && "Missing scratch register!");
+ MI->getOperand(i).setReg(ScratchReg);
- if (MI->getOperand(i).isKill()) {
- isKillInsn = true;
- PrevLastUseOp = i;
- PrevLastUseMI = MI;
- }
}
}
- // If this is the last use of the scratch, stop tracking it. The
- // last use will be a kill operand in an instruction that does
- // not also define the scratch register.
- if (isKillInsn && !isDefInsn) {
- CurrentVirtReg = 0;
- havePrevValue = trackingCurrentValue;
- }
- // Similarly, notice if instruction clobbered the value in the
- // register we're tracking for possible later reuse. This is noted
- // above, but enforced here since the value is still live while we
- // process the rest of the operands of the instruction.
- if (clobbersScratchReg) {
- havePrevValue = false;
- CurrentScratchReg = 0;
- }
if (DoIncr) {
RS->forward(I);
++I;