SelectionDAG: Try to expand all condition codes using getCCSwappedOperands()

This is useful for targets like R600, which only support GT, GE, NE, and EQ
condition codes as it removes the need to handle unsupported condition
codes in target specific code.

There are no tests with this commit, but R600 has been updated to take
advantage of this new feature, so its existing selectcc tests are now
testing the swapped operands path.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191601 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
index c58b8fd0ba..f6406b2a33 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
@@ -1615,8 +1615,13 @@ bool SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeSetCCCondCode(EVT VT,
     // Nothing to do.
     break;
   case TargetLowering::Expand: {
+    ISD::CondCode InvCC = ISD::getSetCCSwappedOperands(CCCode);
+    if (TLI.isCondCodeLegal(InvCC, OpVT)) {
+      std::swap(LHS, RHS);
+      CC = DAG.getCondCode(InvCC);
+      return true;
+    }
     ISD::CondCode CC1 = ISD::SETCC_INVALID, CC2 = ISD::SETCC_INVALID;
-    ISD::CondCode InvCC = ISD::SETCC_INVALID;
     unsigned Opc = 0;
     switch (CCCode) {
     default: llvm_unreachable("Don't know how to expand this condition!");
@@ -1658,15 +1663,9 @@ bool SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeSetCCCondCode(EVT VT,
     case ISD::SETLT:
     case ISD::SETNE:
     case ISD::SETEQ:
-      InvCC = ISD::getSetCCSwappedOperands(CCCode);
-      if (TLI.getCondCodeAction(InvCC, OpVT) == TargetLowering::Expand) {
-        // We only support using the inverted operation and not a
-        // different manner of supporting expanding these cases.
-        llvm_unreachable("Don't know how to expand this condition!");
-      }
-      std::swap(LHS, RHS);
-      CC = DAG.getCondCode(InvCC);
-      return true;
+      // We only support using the inverted operation, which is computed above
+      // and not a different manner of supporting expanding these cases.
+      llvm_unreachable("Don't know how to expand this condition!");
     }
 
     SDValue SetCC1, SetCC2;