summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Target/MSP430/MSP430RegisterInfo.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEli Bendersky <eliben@google.com>2013-02-21 20:05:00 +0000
committerEli Bendersky <eliben@google.com>2013-02-21 20:05:00 +0000
commit700ed80d3da5e98e05ceb90e9bfb66058581a6db (patch)
tree9e56e69a7368d120c5de167f978f3b37cc310815 /lib/Target/MSP430/MSP430RegisterInfo.cpp
parentfece442c697eb29f14b4718bdafa3a97d545b476 (diff)
downloadllvm-700ed80d3da5e98e05ceb90e9bfb66058581a6db.tar.gz
llvm-700ed80d3da5e98e05ceb90e9bfb66058581a6db.tar.bz2
llvm-700ed80d3da5e98e05ceb90e9bfb66058581a6db.tar.xz
Move the eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr method from TargetRegisterInfo
to TargetFrameLowering, where it belongs. Incidentally, this allows us to delete some duplicated (and slightly different!) code in TRI. There are potentially other layering problems that can be cleaned up as a result, or in a similar manner. The refactoring was OK'd by Anton Korobeynikov on llvmdev. Note: this touches the target interfaces, so out-of-tree targets may be affected. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@175788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Target/MSP430/MSP430RegisterInfo.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Target/MSP430/MSP430RegisterInfo.cpp60
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 60 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/MSP430/MSP430RegisterInfo.cpp b/lib/Target/MSP430/MSP430RegisterInfo.cpp
index 6e0a2237f8..0b3e9e2596 100644
--- a/lib/Target/MSP430/MSP430RegisterInfo.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/MSP430/MSP430RegisterInfo.cpp
@@ -101,66 +101,6 @@ MSP430RegisterInfo::getPointerRegClass(const MachineFunction &MF, unsigned Kind)
return &MSP430::GR16RegClass;
}
-void MSP430RegisterInfo::
-eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr(MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
- MachineBasicBlock::iterator I) const {
- const TargetFrameLowering *TFI = MF.getTarget().getFrameLowering();
-
- if (!TFI->hasReservedCallFrame(MF)) {
- // If the stack pointer can be changed after prologue, turn the
- // adjcallstackup instruction into a 'sub SPW, <amt>' and the
- // adjcallstackdown instruction into 'add SPW, <amt>'
- // TODO: consider using push / pop instead of sub + store / add
- MachineInstr *Old = I;
- uint64_t Amount = Old->getOperand(0).getImm();
- if (Amount != 0) {
- // We need to keep the stack aligned properly. To do this, we round the
- // amount of space needed for the outgoing arguments up to the next
- // alignment boundary.
- Amount = (Amount+StackAlign-1)/StackAlign*StackAlign;
-
- MachineInstr *New = 0;
- if (Old->getOpcode() == TII.getCallFrameSetupOpcode()) {
- New = BuildMI(MF, Old->getDebugLoc(),
- TII.get(MSP430::SUB16ri), MSP430::SPW)
- .addReg(MSP430::SPW).addImm(Amount);
- } else {
- assert(Old->getOpcode() == TII.getCallFrameDestroyOpcode());
- // factor out the amount the callee already popped.
- uint64_t CalleeAmt = Old->getOperand(1).getImm();
- Amount -= CalleeAmt;
- if (Amount)
- New = BuildMI(MF, Old->getDebugLoc(),
- TII.get(MSP430::ADD16ri), MSP430::SPW)
- .addReg(MSP430::SPW).addImm(Amount);
- }
-
- if (New) {
- // The SRW implicit def is dead.
- New->getOperand(3).setIsDead();
-
- // Replace the pseudo instruction with a new instruction...
- MBB.insert(I, New);
- }
- }
- } else if (I->getOpcode() == TII.getCallFrameDestroyOpcode()) {
- // If we are performing frame pointer elimination and if the callee pops
- // something off the stack pointer, add it back.
- if (uint64_t CalleeAmt = I->getOperand(1).getImm()) {
- MachineInstr *Old = I;
- MachineInstr *New =
- BuildMI(MF, Old->getDebugLoc(), TII.get(MSP430::SUB16ri),
- MSP430::SPW).addReg(MSP430::SPW).addImm(CalleeAmt);
- // The SRW implicit def is dead.
- New->getOperand(3).setIsDead();
-
- MBB.insert(I, New);
- }
- }
-
- MBB.erase(I);
-}
-
void
MSP430RegisterInfo::eliminateFrameIndex(MachineBasicBlock::iterator II,
int SPAdj, unsigned FIOperandNum,