summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDuncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>2012-02-27 08:14:30 +0000
committerDuncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>2012-02-27 08:14:30 +0000
commit669011f50b8234bb4775d52a2d1e1ba5f6311e62 (patch)
tree661fb8a3274b9d81dbf543c4caa01f04ea07bb5c /lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
parenta89cc7fec81e28a943391d4d641816e42a141e95 (diff)
downloadllvm-669011f50b8234bb4775d52a2d1e1ba5f6311e62.tar.gz
llvm-669011f50b8234bb4775d52a2d1e1ba5f6311e62.tar.bz2
llvm-669011f50b8234bb4775d52a2d1e1ba5f6311e62.tar.xz
When performing a conditional branch depending on the value of a comparison
%cmp (eg: A==B) we already replace %cmp with "true" under the true edge, and with "false" under the false edge. This change enhances this to replace the negated compare (A!=B) with "false" under the true edge and "true" under the false edge. Reported to improve perlbench results by 1%. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151517 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp66
1 files changed, 62 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
index 162ee2b5ce..68281e6620 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
@@ -96,12 +96,17 @@ namespace {
uint32_t nextValueNumber;
Expression create_expression(Instruction* I);
+ Expression create_cmp_expression(unsigned Opcode,
+ CmpInst::Predicate Predicate,
+ Value *LHS, Value *RHS);
Expression create_extractvalue_expression(ExtractValueInst* EI);
uint32_t lookup_or_add_call(CallInst* C);
public:
ValueTable() : nextValueNumber(1) { }
uint32_t lookup_or_add(Value *V);
uint32_t lookup(Value *V) const;
+ uint32_t lookup_or_add_cmp(unsigned Opcode, CmpInst::Predicate Pred,
+ Value *LHS, Value *RHS);
void add(Value *V, uint32_t num);
void clear();
void erase(Value *v);
@@ -181,6 +186,25 @@ Expression ValueTable::create_expression(Instruction *I) {
return e;
}
+Expression ValueTable::create_cmp_expression(unsigned Opcode,
+ CmpInst::Predicate Predicate,
+ Value *LHS, Value *RHS) {
+ assert((Opcode == Instruction::ICmp || Opcode == Instruction::FCmp) &&
+ "Not a comparison!");
+ Expression e;
+ e.type = CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(LHS->getType());
+ e.varargs.push_back(lookup_or_add(LHS));
+ e.varargs.push_back(lookup_or_add(RHS));
+
+ // Sort the operand value numbers so x<y and y>x get the same value number.
+ if (e.varargs[0] > e.varargs[1]) {
+ std::swap(e.varargs[0], e.varargs[1]);
+ Predicate = CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Predicate);
+ }
+ e.opcode = (Opcode << 8) | Predicate;
+ return e;
+}
+
Expression ValueTable::create_extractvalue_expression(ExtractValueInst *EI) {
assert(EI != 0 && "Not an ExtractValueInst?");
Expression e;
@@ -430,6 +454,19 @@ uint32_t ValueTable::lookup(Value *V) const {
return VI->second;
}
+/// lookup_or_add_cmp - Returns the value number of the given comparison,
+/// assigning it a new number if it did not have one before. Useful when
+/// we deduced the result of a comparison, but don't immediately have an
+/// instruction realizing that comparison to hand.
+uint32_t ValueTable::lookup_or_add_cmp(unsigned Opcode,
+ CmpInst::Predicate Predicate,
+ Value *LHS, Value *RHS) {
+ Expression exp = create_cmp_expression(Opcode, Predicate, LHS, RHS);
+ uint32_t& e = expressionNumbering[exp];
+ if (!e) e = nextValueNumber++;
+ return e;
+}
+
/// clear - Remove all entries from the ValueTable.
void ValueTable::clear() {
valueNumbering.clear();
@@ -1987,14 +2024,35 @@ bool GVN::propagateEquality(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, BasicBlock *Root) {
}
// If we are propagating an equality like "(A == B)" == "true" then also
- // propagate the equality A == B.
+ // propagate the equality A == B. When propagating a comparison such as
+ // "(A >= B)" == "true", replace all instances of "A < B" with "false".
if (ICmpInst *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(LHS)) {
- // Only equality comparisons are supported.
+ Value *Op0 = Cmp->getOperand(0), *Op1 = Cmp->getOperand(1);
+
+ // If "A == B" is known true, or "A != B" is known false, then replace
+ // A with B everywhere in the scope.
if ((isKnownTrue && Cmp->getPredicate() == CmpInst::ICMP_EQ) ||
- (isKnownFalse && Cmp->getPredicate() == CmpInst::ICMP_NE)) {
- Value *Op0 = Cmp->getOperand(0), *Op1 = Cmp->getOperand(1);
+ (isKnownFalse && Cmp->getPredicate() == CmpInst::ICMP_NE))
Changed |= propagateEquality(Op0, Op1, Root);
+
+ // If "A >= B" is known true, replace "A < B" with false everywhere.
+ CmpInst::Predicate NotPred = Cmp->getInversePredicate();
+ Constant *NotVal = ConstantInt::get(Cmp->getType(), isKnownFalse);
+ // Since we don't have the instruction "A < B" immediately to hand, work out
+ // the value number that it would have and use that to find an appropriate
+ // instruction (if any).
+ unsigned Num = VN.lookup_or_add_cmp(Cmp->getOpcode(), NotPred, Op0, Op1);
+ Value *NotCmp = findLeader(Root, Num);
+ if (NotCmp && isa<Instruction>(NotCmp)) {
+ unsigned NumReplacements =
+ replaceAllDominatedUsesWith(NotCmp, NotVal, Root);
+ Changed |= NumReplacements > 0;
+ NumGVNEqProp += NumReplacements;
}
+ // Ensure that any instruction in scope that gets the "A < B" value number
+ // is replaced with false.
+ addToLeaderTable(Num, NotVal, Root);
+
return Changed;
}