summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Transforms
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>2008-09-16 18:46:06 +0000
committerDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>2008-09-16 18:46:06 +0000
commit81b28ceab6bd0ed6a784b7dc952ddb0b03fc6de7 (patch)
tree057a8a72e899e9640c6b3892016da39c468f4fa6 /lib/Transforms
parent19a341acb8df340651053c1ebb2403232103445b (diff)
downloadllvm-81b28ceab6bd0ed6a784b7dc952ddb0b03fc6de7.tar.gz
llvm-81b28ceab6bd0ed6a784b7dc952ddb0b03fc6de7.tar.bz2
llvm-81b28ceab6bd0ed6a784b7dc952ddb0b03fc6de7.tar.xz
Improve instcombine's handling of integer min and max in two ways:
- Recognize expressions like "x > -1 ? x : 0" as min/max and turn them into expressions like "x < 0 ? 0 : x", which is easily recognizable as a min/max operation. - Refrain from folding expression like "y/2 < 1" to "y < 2" when the comparison is being used as part of a min or max idiom, like "y/2 < 1 ? 1 : y/2". In that case, the division has another use, so folding doesn't eliminate it, and obfuscates the min/max, making it harder to recognize as a min/max operation. These benefit ScalarEvolution, CodeGen, and anything else that wants to recognize integer min and max. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@56246 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Transforms')
-rw-r--r--lib/Transforms/Scalar/InstructionCombining.cpp144
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InstructionCombining.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InstructionCombining.cpp
index 1cb4fa2c21..e68e646b80 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InstructionCombining.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InstructionCombining.cpp
@@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ namespace {
Instruction *visitBitCast(BitCastInst &CI);
Instruction *FoldSelectOpOp(SelectInst &SI, Instruction *TI,
Instruction *FI);
- Instruction *visitSelectInst(SelectInst &CI);
+ Instruction *visitSelectInst(SelectInst &SI);
+ Instruction *visitSelectInstWithICmp(SelectInst &SI, ICmpInst *ICI);
Instruction *visitCallInst(CallInst &CI);
Instruction *visitInvokeInst(InvokeInst &II);
Instruction *visitPHINode(PHINode &PN);
@@ -5312,8 +5313,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
}
}
- // See if we are doing a comparison between a constant and an instruction that
- // can be folded into the comparison.
+ // See if we are doing a comparison with a constant.
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op1)) {
Value *A, *B;
@@ -5324,9 +5324,9 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
return new ICmpInst(I.getPredicate(), A, B);
}
- // If we have a icmp le or icmp ge instruction, turn it into the appropriate
- // icmp lt or icmp gt instruction. This allows us to rely on them being
- // folded in the code below.
+ // If we have an icmp le or icmp ge instruction, turn it into the
+ // appropriate icmp lt or icmp gt instruction. This allows us to rely on
+ // them being folded in the code below.
switch (I.getPredicate()) {
default: break;
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
@@ -5446,7 +5446,24 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ, Op0, AddOne(CI));
break;
}
-
+ }
+
+ // Test if the ICmpInst instruction is used exclusively by a select as
+ // part of a minimum or maximum operation. If so, refrain from doing
+ // any other folding. This helps out other analyses which understand
+ // non-obfuscated minimum and maximum idioms, such as ScalarEvolution
+ // and CodeGen. And in this case, at least one of the comparison
+ // operands has at least one user besides the compare (the select),
+ // which would often largely negate the benefit of folding anyway.
+ if (I.hasOneUse())
+ if (SelectInst *SI = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(*I.use_begin()))
+ if ((SI->getOperand(1) == Op0 && SI->getOperand(2) == Op1) ||
+ (SI->getOperand(2) == Op0 && SI->getOperand(1) == Op1))
+ return 0;
+
+ // See if we are doing a comparison between a constant and an instruction that
+ // can be folded into the comparison.
+ if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op1)) {
// Since the RHS is a ConstantInt (CI), if the left hand side is an
// instruction, see if that instruction also has constants so that the
// instruction can be folded into the icmp
@@ -8181,6 +8198,91 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldSelectOpOp(SelectInst &SI, Instruction *TI,
return 0;
}
+/// visitSelectInstWithICmp - Visit a SelectInst that has an
+/// ICmpInst as its first operand.
+///
+Instruction *InstCombiner::visitSelectInstWithICmp(SelectInst &SI,
+ ICmpInst *ICI) {
+ bool Changed = false;
+ ICmpInst::Predicate Pred = ICI->getPredicate();
+ Value *CmpLHS = ICI->getOperand(0);
+ Value *CmpRHS = ICI->getOperand(1);
+ Value *TrueVal = SI.getTrueValue();
+ Value *FalseVal = SI.getFalseValue();
+
+ // Check cases where the comparison is with a constant that
+ // can be adjusted to fit the min/max idiom. We may edit ICI in
+ // place here, so make sure the select is the only user.
+ if (ICI->hasOneUse())
+ if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(CmpRHS))
+ switch (Pred) {
+ default: break;
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT: {
+ // X < MIN ? T : F --> F
+ if (CI->isMinValue(Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT))
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, FalseVal);
+ // X < C ? X : C-1 --> X > C-1 ? C-1 : X
+ Constant *AdjustedRHS = SubOne(CI);
+ if ((CmpLHS == TrueVal && AdjustedRHS == FalseVal) ||
+ (CmpLHS == FalseVal && AdjustedRHS == TrueVal)) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
+ CmpRHS = AdjustedRHS;
+ std::swap(FalseVal, TrueVal);
+ ICI->setPredicate(Pred);
+ ICI->setOperand(1, CmpRHS);
+ SI.setOperand(1, TrueVal);
+ SI.setOperand(2, FalseVal);
+ Changed = true;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT: {
+ // X > MAX ? T : F --> F
+ if (CI->isMaxValue(Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT))
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, FalseVal);
+ // X > C ? X : C+1 --> X < C+1 ? C+1 : X
+ Constant *AdjustedRHS = AddOne(CI);
+ if ((CmpLHS == TrueVal && AdjustedRHS == FalseVal) ||
+ (CmpLHS == FalseVal && AdjustedRHS == TrueVal)) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
+ CmpRHS = AdjustedRHS;
+ std::swap(FalseVal, TrueVal);
+ ICI->setPredicate(Pred);
+ ICI->setOperand(1, CmpRHS);
+ SI.setOperand(1, TrueVal);
+ SI.setOperand(2, FalseVal);
+ Changed = true;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (CmpLHS == TrueVal && CmpRHS == FalseVal) {
+ // Transform (X == Y) ? X : Y -> Y
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, FalseVal);
+ // Transform (X != Y) ? X : Y -> X
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE)
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, TrueVal);
+ /// NOTE: if we wanted to, this is where to detect integer MIN/MAX
+
+ } else if (CmpLHS == FalseVal && CmpRHS == TrueVal) {
+ // Transform (X == Y) ? Y : X -> X
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, FalseVal);
+ // Transform (X != Y) ? Y : X -> Y
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE)
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, TrueVal);
+ /// NOTE: if we wanted to, this is where to detect integer MIN/MAX
+ }
+
+ /// NOTE: if we wanted to, this is where to detect integer ABS
+
+ return Changed ? &SI : 0;
+}
+
Instruction *InstCombiner::visitSelectInst(SelectInst &SI) {
Value *CondVal = SI.getCondition();
Value *TrueVal = SI.getTrueValue();
@@ -8329,7 +8431,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitSelectInst(SelectInst &SI) {
// Transform (X != Y) ? X : Y -> X
if (FCI->getPredicate() == FCmpInst::FCMP_ONE)
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, TrueVal);
- // NOTE: if we wanted to, this is where to detect MIN/MAX/ABS/etc.
+ // NOTE: if we wanted to, this is where to detect MIN/MAX
} else if (FCI->getOperand(0) == FalseVal && FCI->getOperand(1) == TrueVal){
// Transform (X == Y) ? Y : X -> X
@@ -8347,31 +8449,15 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitSelectInst(SelectInst &SI) {
// Transform (X != Y) ? Y : X -> Y
if (FCI->getPredicate() == FCmpInst::FCMP_ONE)
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, TrueVal);
- // NOTE: if we wanted to, this is where to detect MIN/MAX/ABS/etc.
+ // NOTE: if we wanted to, this is where to detect MIN/MAX
}
+ // NOTE: if we wanted to, this is where to detect ABS
}
// See if we are selecting two values based on a comparison of the two values.
- if (ICmpInst *ICI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(CondVal)) {
- if (ICI->getOperand(0) == TrueVal && ICI->getOperand(1) == FalseVal) {
- // Transform (X == Y) ? X : Y -> Y
- if (ICI->getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, FalseVal);
- // Transform (X != Y) ? X : Y -> X
- if (ICI->getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, TrueVal);
- // NOTE: if we wanted to, this is where to detect MIN/MAX/ABS/etc.
-
- } else if (ICI->getOperand(0) == FalseVal && ICI->getOperand(1) == TrueVal){
- // Transform (X == Y) ? Y : X -> X
- if (ICI->getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, FalseVal);
- // Transform (X != Y) ? Y : X -> Y
- if (ICI->getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, TrueVal);
- // NOTE: if we wanted to, this is where to detect MIN/MAX/ABS/etc.
- }
- }
+ if (ICmpInst *ICI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(CondVal))
+ if (Instruction *Result = visitSelectInstWithICmp(SI, ICI))
+ return Result;
if (Instruction *TI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(TrueVal))
if (Instruction *FI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(FalseVal))