[InstCombine] mark ADD with nuw if no unsigned overflow

Summary:
As a starting step, we only use one simple heuristic: if the sign bits
of both a and b are zero, we can prove "add a, b" do not unsigned
overflow, and thus convert it to "add nuw a, b".

Updated all affected tests and added two new tests (@zero_sign_bit and
@zero_sign_bit2) in AddOverflow.ll

Test Plan: make check-all

Reviewers: eliben, rafael, meheff, chandlerc

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: chandlerc, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4144

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@211084 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

2 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombine.h b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombine.h
index ea1839c3bc..ab4dc1ce23 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombine.h
+++ b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombine.h
@@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ private:
                                  bool DoXform = true);
   Instruction *transformSExtICmp(ICmpInst *ICI, Instruction &CI);
   bool WillNotOverflowSignedAdd(Value *LHS, Value *RHS);
+  bool WillNotOverflowUnsignedAdd(Value *LHS, Value *RHS);
   Value *EmitGEPOffset(User *GEP);
   Instruction *scalarizePHI(ExtractElementInst &EI, PHINode *PN);
   Value *EvaluateInDifferentElementOrder(Value *V, ArrayRef<int> Mask);
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp
index 63c440afcd..f6658964ae 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp
@@ -965,6 +965,21 @@ bool InstCombiner::WillNotOverflowSignedAdd(Value *LHS, Value *RHS) {
   return false;
 }
 
+/// WillNotOverflowUnsignedAdd - Return true if we can prove that:
+///    (zext (add LHS, RHS))  === (add (zext LHS), (zext RHS))
+bool InstCombiner::WillNotOverflowUnsignedAdd(Value *LHS, Value *RHS) {
+  // There are different heuristics we can use for this. Here is a simple one.
+  // If the sign bit of LHS and that of RHS are both zero, no unsigned wrap.
+  bool LHSKnownNonNegative, LHSKnownNegative;
+  bool RHSKnownNonNegative, RHSKnownNegative;
+  ComputeSignBit(LHS, LHSKnownNonNegative, LHSKnownNegative, DL, 0);
+  ComputeSignBit(RHS, RHSKnownNonNegative, RHSKnownNegative, DL, 0);
+  if (LHSKnownNonNegative && RHSKnownNonNegative)
+    return true;
+
+  return false;
+}
+
 Instruction *InstCombiner::visitAdd(BinaryOperator &I) {
   bool Changed = SimplifyAssociativeOrCommutative(I);
   Value *LHS = I.getOperand(0), *RHS = I.getOperand(1);
@@ -1240,10 +1255,17 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitAdd(BinaryOperator &I) {
       return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(A, B);
   }
 
+  // TODO(jingyue): Consider WillNotOverflowSignedAdd and
+  // WillNotOverflowUnsignedAdd to reduce the number of invocations of
+  // computeKnownBits.
   if (!I.hasNoSignedWrap() && WillNotOverflowSignedAdd(LHS, RHS)) {
     Changed = true;
     I.setHasNoSignedWrap(true);
   }
+  if (!I.hasNoUnsignedWrap() && WillNotOverflowUnsignedAdd(LHS, RHS)) {
+    Changed = true;
+    I.setHasNoUnsignedWrap(true);
+  }
 
   return Changed ? &I : nullptr;
 }