If there is a def of a super-register followed by a use of a sub-register, do *not* add an implicit def of the sub-register. e.g.

EAX = ..., AX<imp-def>
...
    = AX

This creates a double-def. Apparently this used to be necessary but is no longer needed.

Thanks to Anton for pointing this out. Anton, I cannot create a test case without your uncommitted ARM patches. Please check in a test case for me.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@72755 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/LiveVariables.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/LiveVariables.cpp
index c33d81e8a8..6228821691 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/LiveVariables.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/LiveVariables.cpp
@@ -242,20 +242,6 @@ void LiveVariables::HandlePhysRegUse(unsigned Reg, MachineInstr *MI) {
     }
   }
 
-  // There was an earlier def of a super-register. Add implicit def to that MI.
-  //
-  //   A: EAX = ...
-  //   B: ... = AX
-  //
-  // Add implicit def to A if there isn't a use of AX (or EAX) before B.
-  if (!PhysRegUse[Reg]) {
-    MachineInstr *Def = PhysRegDef[Reg];
-    if (Def && !Def->modifiesRegister(Reg))
-      Def->addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateReg(Reg,
-                                                true  /*IsDef*/,
-                                                true  /*IsImp*/));
-  }
-  
   // Remember this use.
   PhysRegUse[Reg]  = MI;
   for (const unsigned *SubRegs = TRI->getSubRegisters(Reg);