summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBenjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com>2012-10-26 20:25:01 +0000
committerBenjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com>2012-10-26 20:25:01 +0000
commitb8b3f6081f8dc409e7281e1597d8d94e50e4b028 (patch)
tree69338256a9d7cab2a8872f1bd85eeb1692732018 /lib
parent480b1b28ea6fc1bb5c78d99472df624cfd3fce47 (diff)
downloadllvm-b8b3f6081f8dc409e7281e1597d8d94e50e4b028.tar.gz
llvm-b8b3f6081f8dc409e7281e1597d8d94e50e4b028.tar.bz2
llvm-b8b3f6081f8dc409e7281e1597d8d94e50e4b028.tar.xz
Remove LoopDependenceAnalysis.
It was unmaintained and not much more than a stub. The new DependenceAnalysis pass is both more general and complete. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166810 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r--lib/Analysis/Analysis.cpp1
-rw-r--r--lib/Analysis/CMakeLists.txt1
-rw-r--r--lib/Analysis/LoopDependenceAnalysis.cpp362
3 files changed, 0 insertions, 364 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/Analysis.cpp b/lib/Analysis/Analysis.cpp
index 588206e915..8969ea9563 100644
--- a/lib/Analysis/Analysis.cpp
+++ b/lib/Analysis/Analysis.cpp
@@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ void llvm::initializeAnalysis(PassRegistry &Registry) {
initializeLazyValueInfoPass(Registry);
initializeLibCallAliasAnalysisPass(Registry);
initializeLintPass(Registry);
- initializeLoopDependenceAnalysisPass(Registry);
initializeLoopInfoPass(Registry);
initializeMemDepPrinterPass(Registry);
initializeMemoryDependenceAnalysisPass(Registry);
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/CMakeLists.txt b/lib/Analysis/CMakeLists.txt
index 3ce888fefa..8f5a2f2893 100644
--- a/lib/Analysis/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/lib/Analysis/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ add_llvm_library(LLVMAnalysis
LibCallSemantics.cpp
Lint.cpp
Loads.cpp
- LoopDependenceAnalysis.cpp
LoopInfo.cpp
LoopPass.cpp
MemDepPrinter.cpp
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/LoopDependenceAnalysis.cpp b/lib/Analysis/LoopDependenceAnalysis.cpp
deleted file mode 100644
index b696e5fae1..0000000000
--- a/lib/Analysis/LoopDependenceAnalysis.cpp
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,362 +0,0 @@
-//===- LoopDependenceAnalysis.cpp - LDA Implementation ----------*- C++ -*-===//
-//
-// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
-//
-// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
-// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
-// This is the (beginning) of an implementation of a loop dependence analysis
-// framework, which is used to detect dependences in memory accesses in loops.
-//
-// Please note that this is work in progress and the interface is subject to
-// change.
-//
-// TODO: adapt as implementation progresses.
-//
-// TODO: document lingo (pair, subscript, index)
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-#define DEBUG_TYPE "lda"
-#include "llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h"
-#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopDependenceAnalysis.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpressions.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
-#include "llvm/Assembly/Writer.h"
-#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
-#include "llvm/Operator.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/Allocator.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
-#include "llvm/DataLayout.h"
-using namespace llvm;
-
-STATISTIC(NumAnswered, "Number of dependence queries answered");
-STATISTIC(NumAnalysed, "Number of distinct dependence pairs analysed");
-STATISTIC(NumDependent, "Number of pairs with dependent accesses");
-STATISTIC(NumIndependent, "Number of pairs with independent accesses");
-STATISTIC(NumUnknown, "Number of pairs with unknown accesses");
-
-LoopPass *llvm::createLoopDependenceAnalysisPass() {
- return new LoopDependenceAnalysis();
-}
-
-INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(LoopDependenceAnalysis, "lda",
- "Loop Dependence Analysis", false, true)
-INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(ScalarEvolution)
-INITIALIZE_AG_DEPENDENCY(AliasAnalysis)
-INITIALIZE_PASS_END(LoopDependenceAnalysis, "lda",
- "Loop Dependence Analysis", false, true)
-char LoopDependenceAnalysis::ID = 0;
-
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// Utility Functions
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-static inline bool IsMemRefInstr(const Value *V) {
- const Instruction *I = dyn_cast<const Instruction>(V);
- return I && (I->mayReadFromMemory() || I->mayWriteToMemory());
-}
-
-static void GetMemRefInstrs(const Loop *L,
- SmallVectorImpl<Instruction*> &Memrefs) {
- for (Loop::block_iterator b = L->block_begin(), be = L->block_end();
- b != be; ++b)
- for (BasicBlock::iterator i = (*b)->begin(), ie = (*b)->end();
- i != ie; ++i)
- if (IsMemRefInstr(i))
- Memrefs.push_back(i);
-}
-
-static bool IsLoadOrStoreInst(Value *I) {
- // Returns true if the load or store can be analyzed. Atomic and volatile
- // operations have properties which this analysis does not understand.
- if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(I))
- return LI->isUnordered();
- else if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(I))
- return SI->isUnordered();
- return false;
-}
-
-static Value *GetPointerOperand(Value *I) {
- if (LoadInst *i = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(I))
- return i->getPointerOperand();
- if (StoreInst *i = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(I))
- return i->getPointerOperand();
- llvm_unreachable("Value is no load or store instruction!");
-}
-
-static AliasAnalysis::AliasResult UnderlyingObjectsAlias(AliasAnalysis *AA,
- const Value *A,
- const Value *B) {
- const Value *aObj = GetUnderlyingObject(A);
- const Value *bObj = GetUnderlyingObject(B);
- return AA->alias(aObj, AA->getTypeStoreSize(aObj->getType()),
- bObj, AA->getTypeStoreSize(bObj->getType()));
-}
-
-static inline const SCEV *GetZeroSCEV(ScalarEvolution *SE) {
- return SE->getConstant(Type::getInt32Ty(SE->getContext()), 0L);
-}
-
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// Dependence Testing
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::isDependencePair(const Value *A,
- const Value *B) const {
- return IsMemRefInstr(A) &&
- IsMemRefInstr(B) &&
- (cast<const Instruction>(A)->mayWriteToMemory() ||
- cast<const Instruction>(B)->mayWriteToMemory());
-}
-
-bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::findOrInsertDependencePair(Value *A,
- Value *B,
- DependencePair *&P) {
- void *insertPos = 0;
- FoldingSetNodeID id;
- id.AddPointer(A);
- id.AddPointer(B);
-
- P = Pairs.FindNodeOrInsertPos(id, insertPos);
- if (P) return true;
-
- P = new (PairAllocator) DependencePair(id, A, B);
- Pairs.InsertNode(P, insertPos);
- return false;
-}
-
-void LoopDependenceAnalysis::getLoops(const SCEV *S,
- DenseSet<const Loop*>* Loops) const {
- // Refactor this into an SCEVVisitor, if efficiency becomes a concern.
- for (const Loop *L = this->L; L != 0; L = L->getParentLoop())
- if (!SE->isLoopInvariant(S, L))
- Loops->insert(L);
-}
-
-bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::isLoopInvariant(const SCEV *S) const {
- DenseSet<const Loop*> loops;
- getLoops(S, &loops);
- return loops.empty();
-}
-
-bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::isAffine(const SCEV *S) const {
- const SCEVAddRecExpr *rec = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S);
- return isLoopInvariant(S) || (rec && rec->isAffine());
-}
-
-bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::isZIVPair(const SCEV *A, const SCEV *B) const {
- return isLoopInvariant(A) && isLoopInvariant(B);
-}
-
-bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::isSIVPair(const SCEV *A, const SCEV *B) const {
- DenseSet<const Loop*> loops;
- getLoops(A, &loops);
- getLoops(B, &loops);
- return loops.size() == 1;
-}
-
-LoopDependenceAnalysis::DependenceResult
-LoopDependenceAnalysis::analyseZIV(const SCEV *A,
- const SCEV *B,
- Subscript *S) const {
- assert(isZIVPair(A, B) && "Attempted to ZIV-test non-ZIV SCEVs!");
- return A == B ? Dependent : Independent;
-}
-
-LoopDependenceAnalysis::DependenceResult
-LoopDependenceAnalysis::analyseSIV(const SCEV *A,
- const SCEV *B,
- Subscript *S) const {
- return Unknown; // TODO: Implement.
-}
-
-LoopDependenceAnalysis::DependenceResult
-LoopDependenceAnalysis::analyseMIV(const SCEV *A,
- const SCEV *B,
- Subscript *S) const {
- return Unknown; // TODO: Implement.
-}
-
-LoopDependenceAnalysis::DependenceResult
-LoopDependenceAnalysis::analyseSubscript(const SCEV *A,
- const SCEV *B,
- Subscript *S) const {
- DEBUG(dbgs() << " Testing subscript: " << *A << ", " << *B << "\n");
-
- if (A == B) {
- DEBUG(dbgs() << " -> [D] same SCEV\n");
- return Dependent;
- }
-
- if (!isAffine(A) || !isAffine(B)) {
- DEBUG(dbgs() << " -> [?] not affine\n");
- return Unknown;
- }
-
- if (isZIVPair(A, B))
- return analyseZIV(A, B, S);
-
- if (isSIVPair(A, B))
- return analyseSIV(A, B, S);
-
- return analyseMIV(A, B, S);
-}
-
-LoopDependenceAnalysis::DependenceResult
-LoopDependenceAnalysis::analysePair(DependencePair *P) const {
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "Analysing:\n" << *P->A << "\n" << *P->B << "\n");
-
- // We only analyse loads and stores but no possible memory accesses by e.g.
- // free, call, or invoke instructions.
- if (!IsLoadOrStoreInst(P->A) || !IsLoadOrStoreInst(P->B)) {
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "--> [?] no load/store\n");
- return Unknown;
- }
-
- Value *aPtr = GetPointerOperand(P->A);
- Value *bPtr = GetPointerOperand(P->B);
-
- switch (UnderlyingObjectsAlias(AA, aPtr, bPtr)) {
- case AliasAnalysis::MayAlias:
- case AliasAnalysis::PartialAlias:
- // We can not analyse objects if we do not know about their aliasing.
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "---> [?] may alias\n");
- return Unknown;
-
- case AliasAnalysis::NoAlias:
- // If the objects noalias, they are distinct, accesses are independent.
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "---> [I] no alias\n");
- return Independent;
-
- case AliasAnalysis::MustAlias:
- break; // The underlying objects alias, test accesses for dependence.
- }
-
- const GEPOperator *aGEP = dyn_cast<GEPOperator>(aPtr);
- const GEPOperator *bGEP = dyn_cast<GEPOperator>(bPtr);
-
- if (!aGEP || !bGEP)
- return Unknown;
-
- // FIXME: Is filtering coupled subscripts necessary?
-
- // Collect GEP operand pairs (FIXME: use GetGEPOperands from BasicAA), adding
- // trailing zeroes to the smaller GEP, if needed.
- typedef SmallVector<std::pair<const SCEV*, const SCEV*>, 4> GEPOpdPairsTy;
- GEPOpdPairsTy opds;
- for(GEPOperator::const_op_iterator aIdx = aGEP->idx_begin(),
- aEnd = aGEP->idx_end(),
- bIdx = bGEP->idx_begin(),
- bEnd = bGEP->idx_end();
- aIdx != aEnd && bIdx != bEnd;
- aIdx += (aIdx != aEnd), bIdx += (bIdx != bEnd)) {
- const SCEV* aSCEV = (aIdx != aEnd) ? SE->getSCEV(*aIdx) : GetZeroSCEV(SE);
- const SCEV* bSCEV = (bIdx != bEnd) ? SE->getSCEV(*bIdx) : GetZeroSCEV(SE);
- opds.push_back(std::make_pair(aSCEV, bSCEV));
- }
-
- if (!opds.empty() && opds[0].first != opds[0].second) {
- // We cannot (yet) handle arbitrary GEP pointer offsets. By limiting
- //
- // TODO: this could be relaxed by adding the size of the underlying object
- // to the first subscript. If we have e.g. (GEP x,0,i; GEP x,2,-i) and we
- // know that x is a [100 x i8]*, we could modify the first subscript to be
- // (i, 200-i) instead of (i, -i).
- return Unknown;
- }
-
- // Now analyse the collected operand pairs (skipping the GEP ptr offsets).
- for (GEPOpdPairsTy::const_iterator i = opds.begin() + 1, end = opds.end();
- i != end; ++i) {
- Subscript subscript;
- DependenceResult result = analyseSubscript(i->first, i->second, &subscript);
- if (result != Dependent) {
- // We either proved independence or failed to analyse this subscript.
- // Further subscripts will not improve the situation, so abort early.
- return result;
- }
- P->Subscripts.push_back(subscript);
- }
- // We successfully analysed all subscripts but failed to prove independence.
- return Dependent;
-}
-
-bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::depends(Value *A, Value *B) {
- assert(isDependencePair(A, B) && "Values form no dependence pair!");
- ++NumAnswered;
-
- DependencePair *p;
- if (!findOrInsertDependencePair(A, B, p)) {
- // The pair is not cached, so analyse it.
- ++NumAnalysed;
- switch (p->Result = analysePair(p)) {
- case Dependent: ++NumDependent; break;
- case Independent: ++NumIndependent; break;
- case Unknown: ++NumUnknown; break;
- }
- }
- return p->Result != Independent;
-}
-
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// LoopDependenceAnalysis Implementation
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &) {
- this->L = L;
- AA = &getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();
- SE = &getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>();
- return false;
-}
-
-void LoopDependenceAnalysis::releaseMemory() {
- Pairs.clear();
- PairAllocator.Reset();
-}
-
-void LoopDependenceAnalysis::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
- AU.setPreservesAll();
- AU.addRequiredTransitive<AliasAnalysis>();
- AU.addRequiredTransitive<ScalarEvolution>();
-}
-
-static void PrintLoopInfo(raw_ostream &OS,
- LoopDependenceAnalysis *LDA, const Loop *L) {
- if (!L->empty()) return; // ignore non-innermost loops
-
- SmallVector<Instruction*, 8> memrefs;
- GetMemRefInstrs(L, memrefs);
-
- OS << "Loop at depth " << L->getLoopDepth() << ", header block: ";
- WriteAsOperand(OS, L->getHeader(), false);
- OS << "\n";
-
- OS << " Load/store instructions: " << memrefs.size() << "\n";
- for (SmallVector<Instruction*, 8>::const_iterator x = memrefs.begin(),
- end = memrefs.end(); x != end; ++x)
- OS << "\t" << (x - memrefs.begin()) << ": " << **x << "\n";
-
- OS << " Pairwise dependence results:\n";
- for (SmallVector<Instruction*, 8>::const_iterator x = memrefs.begin(),
- end = memrefs.end(); x != end; ++x)
- for (SmallVector<Instruction*, 8>::const_iterator y = x + 1;
- y != end; ++y)
- if (LDA->isDependencePair(*x, *y))
- OS << "\t" << (x - memrefs.begin()) << "," << (y - memrefs.begin())
- << ": " << (LDA->depends(*x, *y) ? "dependent" : "independent")
- << "\n";
-}
-
-void LoopDependenceAnalysis::print(raw_ostream &OS, const Module*) const {
- // TODO: doc why const_cast is safe
- PrintLoopInfo(OS, const_cast<LoopDependenceAnalysis*>(this), this->L);
-}