summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>2012-08-17 18:21:28 +0000
committerRafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>2012-08-17 18:21:28 +0000
commitd5118c8f78a05ad0b426b6032138d1d934b77c8d (patch)
tree4b2ceef73af9e25167fb81abcdb1993df439c622 /lib
parent1f1ab3e9c4dbef6a2d610b29903592986be09a10 (diff)
downloadllvm-d5118c8f78a05ad0b426b6032138d1d934b77c8d.tar.gz
llvm-d5118c8f78a05ad0b426b6032138d1d934b77c8d.tar.bz2
llvm-d5118c8f78a05ad0b426b6032138d1d934b77c8d.tar.xz
Assert that dominates is not given a multiple edge. Finding out if we have
multiple edges between two blocks is linear. If the caller is iterating all edges leaving a BB that would be a square time algorithm. It is more efficient to have the callers handle that case. Currently the only callers are: * GVN: already avoids the multiple edge case. * Verifier: could only hit this assert when looking at an invalid invoke. Since it already rejects the invoke, just avoid computing the dominance for it. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@162113 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r--lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp10
-rw-r--r--lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp7
2 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp b/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp
index 60bdeac16b..77b2403d87 100644
--- a/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp
+++ b/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp
@@ -161,6 +161,11 @@ bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def,
bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE,
const BasicBlock *UseBB) const {
+ // Assert that we have a single edge. We could handle them by simply
+ // returning false, but since isSingleEdge is linear on the number of
+ // edges, the callers can normally handle them more efficiently.
+ assert(BBE.isSingleEdge());
+
// If the BB the edge ends in doesn't dominate the use BB, then the
// edge also doesn't.
const BasicBlock *Start = BBE.getStart();
@@ -207,6 +212,11 @@ bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE,
bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE,
const Use &U) const {
+ // Assert that we have a single edge. We could handle them by simply
+ // returning false, but since isSingleEdge is linear on the number of
+ // edges, the callers can normally handle them more efficiently.
+ assert(BBE.isSingleEdge());
+
Instruction *UserInst = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
// A PHI in the end of the edge is dominated by it.
PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(UserInst);
diff --git a/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp b/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp
index 38914b3fe7..7ff97c3479 100644
--- a/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp
+++ b/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp
@@ -1575,6 +1575,13 @@ void Verifier::visitLandingPadInst(LandingPadInst &LPI) {
void Verifier::verifyDominatesUse(Instruction &I, unsigned i) {
Instruction *Op = cast<Instruction>(I.getOperand(i));
+ // If the we have an invalid invoke, don't try to compute the dominance.
+ // We already reject it in the invoke specific checks and the dominance
+ // computation doesn't handle multiple edges.
+ if (InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(Op)) {
+ if (II->getNormalDest() == II->getUnwindDest())
+ return;
+ }
const Use &U = I.getOperandUse(i);
Assert2(InstsInThisBlock.count(Op) || DT->dominates(Op, U),