Fix inlining to not produce duplicate landingpad clauses

Before this change, inlining one "invoke" into an outer "invoke" call
site can lead to the outer landingpad's catch/filter clauses being
copied multiple times into the resulting landingpad.  This happens:

 * when the inlined function contains multiple "resume" instructions,
   because forwardResume() copies the clauses but is called multiple
   times;

 * when the inlined function contains a "resume" and a "call", because
   HandleCallsInBlockInlinedThroughInvoke() copies the clauses but is
   redundant with forwardResume().

Fix this by deduplicating the code.

This problem doesn't lead to any incorrect execution; it's only
untidy.

This change will make fixing PR17872 a little easier.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196710 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

2 files changed, 117 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke.ll b/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke.ll
index c3941388f9..c53bb5aa17 100644
--- a/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke.ll
+++ b/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke.ll
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ eh.resume:
 ; CHECK:      landingpad { i8*, i32 } personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    cleanup
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
-; CHECK-NEXT:    catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
 ; CHECK-NEXT: invoke void @_ZN1AD1Ev(%struct.A* [[A]])
 ; CHECK-NEXT:   to label %[[LBL:[^\s]+]] unwind
 ; CHECK: [[LBL]]:
@@ -167,7 +166,6 @@ eh.resume:
 ; CHECK-NEXT: [[LPADVAL1:%.*]] = landingpad { i8*, i32 } personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    cleanup
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
-; CHECK-NEXT:    catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
 ; CHECK-NEXT: invoke void @_ZN1AD1Ev(%struct.A* [[A1]])
 ; CHECK-NEXT:   to label %[[RESUME1:[^\s]+]] unwind
 ; CHECK: [[RESUME1]]:
@@ -187,7 +185,6 @@ eh.resume:
 ; CHECK-NEXT: [[LPADVAL2:%.*]] = landingpad { i8*, i32 } personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
 ; CHECK-NEXT:   cleanup
 ; CHECK-NEXT:   catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
-; CHECK-NEXT:   catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
 ; CHECK-NEXT: invoke void @_ZN1AD1Ev(%struct.A* [[A2]])
 ; CHECK-NEXT:   to label %[[RESUME2:[^\s]+]] unwind
 ; CHECK: [[RESUME2]]:
@@ -275,7 +272,6 @@ lpad.cont:
 ; CHECK:      landingpad { i8*, i32 } personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    cleanup
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
-; CHECK-NEXT:    catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
 ; CHECK-NEXT: invoke void @_ZN1AD1Ev(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:   to label %[[L:[^\s]+]] unwind
 ; CHECK:    [[L]]:
@@ -322,7 +318,6 @@ terminate:
 ; CHECK:      landingpad { i8*, i32 } personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    cleanup
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
-; CHECK-NEXT:    catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
 ; CHECK-NEXT: invoke void @_ZN1AD1Ev(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:   to label %[[L:[^\s]+]] unwind
 ; CHECK:    [[L]]:
diff --git a/test/Transforms/Inline/invoke-combine-clauses.ll b/test/Transforms/Inline/invoke-combine-clauses.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5f06039b9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/Transforms/Inline/invoke-combine-clauses.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+; RUN: opt %s -inline -S | FileCheck %s
+
+declare void @external_func()
+declare void @abort()
+
+@exception_inner = external global i8
+@exception_outer = external global i8
+@condition = external global i1
+
+
+; Check for a bug in which multiple "resume" instructions in the
+; inlined function caused "catch i8* @exception_outer" to appear
+; multiple times in the resulting landingpad.
+
+define internal void @inner_multiple_resume() {
+  invoke void @external_func()
+      to label %cont unwind label %lpad
+cont:
+  ret void
+lpad:
+  %lp = landingpad i32 personality i8* null
+      catch i8* @exception_inner
+  %cond = load i1* @condition
+  br i1 %cond, label %resume1, label %resume2
+resume1:
+  resume i32 1
+resume2:
+  resume i32 2
+}
+
+define void @outer_multiple_resume() {
+  invoke void @inner_multiple_resume()
+      to label %cont unwind label %lpad
+cont:
+  ret void
+lpad:
+  %lp = landingpad i32 personality i8* null
+      catch i8* @exception_outer
+  resume i32 %lp
+}
+; CHECK: define void @outer_multiple_resume()
+; CHECK: %lp.i = landingpad
+; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* @exception_inner
+; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* @exception_outer
+; Check that there isn't another "catch" clause:
+; CHECK-NEXT: load
+
+
+; Check for a bug in which having a "resume" and a "call" in the
+; inlined function caused "catch i8* @exception_outer" to appear
+; multiple times in the resulting landingpad.
+
+define internal void @inner_resume_and_call() {
+  call void @external_func()
+  invoke void @external_func()
+      to label %cont unwind label %lpad
+cont:
+  ret void
+lpad:
+  %lp = landingpad i32 personality i8* null
+      catch i8* @exception_inner
+  resume i32 %lp
+}
+
+define void @outer_resume_and_call() {
+  invoke void @inner_resume_and_call()
+      to label %cont unwind label %lpad
+cont:
+  ret void
+lpad:
+  %lp = landingpad i32 personality i8* null
+      catch i8* @exception_outer
+  resume i32 %lp
+}
+; CHECK: define void @outer_resume_and_call()
+; CHECK: %lp.i = landingpad
+; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* @exception_inner
+; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* @exception_outer
+; Check that there isn't another "catch" clause:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br
+
+
+; Check what happens if the inlined function contains an "invoke" but
+; no "resume".  In this case, the inlined landingpad does not need to
+; include the "catch i8* @exception_outer" clause from the outer
+; function (since the outer function's landingpad will not be
+; reachable), but it's OK to include this clause.
+
+define internal void @inner_no_resume_or_call() {
+  invoke void @external_func()
+      to label %cont unwind label %lpad
+cont:
+  ret void
+lpad:
+  %lp = landingpad i32 personality i8* null
+      catch i8* @exception_inner
+  ; A landingpad might have no "resume" if a C++ destructor aborts.
+  call void @abort() noreturn nounwind
+  unreachable
+}
+
+define void @outer_no_resume_or_call() {
+  invoke void @inner_no_resume_or_call()
+      to label %cont unwind label %lpad
+cont:
+  ret void
+lpad:
+  %lp = landingpad i32 personality i8* null
+      catch i8* @exception_outer
+  resume i32 %lp
+}
+; CHECK: define void @outer_no_resume_or_call()
+; CHECK: %lp.i = landingpad
+; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* @exception_inner
+; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* @exception_outer
+; Check that there isn't another "catch" clause:
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @abort()