summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/unittests/Analysis
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2014-04-23 23:12:06 +0000
committerChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2014-04-23 23:12:06 +0000
commit31d2477c683f3c411195a896b852af286d49cfcb (patch)
tree4e15b9351fcaff55a38ff5c90c5906d4fb950d3d /unittests/Analysis
parente69ea7d8ae951f115511580a913c5802a9843659 (diff)
downloadllvm-31d2477c683f3c411195a896b852af286d49cfcb.tar.gz
llvm-31d2477c683f3c411195a896b852af286d49cfcb.tar.bz2
llvm-31d2477c683f3c411195a896b852af286d49cfcb.tar.xz
[LCG] Switch the SCC lookup to be in terms of call graph nodes rather
than functions. So far, this access pattern is *much* more common. It seems likely that any user of this interface is going to have nodes at the point that they are querying the SCCs. No functionality changed. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207045 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'unittests/Analysis')
-rw-r--r--unittests/Analysis/LazyCallGraphTest.cpp70
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/unittests/Analysis/LazyCallGraphTest.cpp b/unittests/Analysis/LazyCallGraphTest.cpp
index b08a3c51ec..a880c64d50 100644
--- a/unittests/Analysis/LazyCallGraphTest.cpp
+++ b/unittests/Analysis/LazyCallGraphTest.cpp
@@ -293,16 +293,16 @@ TEST(LazyCallGraphTest, MultiArmSCC) {
LazyCallGraph::SCC *SCC = *SCCI++;
EXPECT_EQ(CG.postorder_scc_end(), SCCI);
- LazyCallGraph::Node *A = CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "a"));
- LazyCallGraph::Node *B = CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "b"));
- LazyCallGraph::Node *C = CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "c"));
- LazyCallGraph::Node *D = CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "d"));
- LazyCallGraph::Node *E = CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "e"));
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG.lookupSCC(A->getFunction()));
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG.lookupSCC(B->getFunction()));
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG.lookupSCC(C->getFunction()));
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG.lookupSCC(D->getFunction()));
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG.lookupSCC(E->getFunction()));
+ LazyCallGraph::Node &A = *CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "a"));
+ LazyCallGraph::Node &B = *CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "b"));
+ LazyCallGraph::Node &C = *CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "c"));
+ LazyCallGraph::Node &D = *CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "d"));
+ LazyCallGraph::Node &E = *CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "e"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG.lookupSCC(A));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG.lookupSCC(B));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG.lookupSCC(C));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG.lookupSCC(D));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG.lookupSCC(E));
}
TEST(LazyCallGraphTest, InterSCCEdgeRemoval) {
@@ -322,20 +322,20 @@ TEST(LazyCallGraphTest, InterSCCEdgeRemoval) {
for (LazyCallGraph::SCC *C : CG.postorder_sccs())
(void)C;
- LazyCallGraph::Node *A = CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "a"));
- LazyCallGraph::Node *B = CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "b"));
- LazyCallGraph::SCC *AC = CG.lookupSCC(lookupFunction(*M, "a"));
- LazyCallGraph::SCC *BC = CG.lookupSCC(lookupFunction(*M, "b"));
+ LazyCallGraph::Node &A = *CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "a"));
+ LazyCallGraph::Node &B = *CG.lookup(lookupFunction(*M, "b"));
+ LazyCallGraph::SCC &AC = *CG.lookupSCC(A);
+ LazyCallGraph::SCC &BC = *CG.lookupSCC(B);
- EXPECT_EQ("b", A->begin()->getFunction().getName());
- EXPECT_EQ(B->end(), B->begin());
- EXPECT_EQ(AC, *BC->parent_begin());
+ EXPECT_EQ("b", A.begin()->getFunction().getName());
+ EXPECT_EQ(B.end(), B.begin());
+ EXPECT_EQ(&AC, *BC.parent_begin());
- CG.removeEdge(*A, lookupFunction(*M, "b"));
+ CG.removeEdge(A, lookupFunction(*M, "b"));
- EXPECT_EQ(A->end(), A->begin());
- EXPECT_EQ(B->end(), B->begin());
- EXPECT_EQ(BC->parent_end(), BC->parent_begin());
+ EXPECT_EQ(A.end(), A.begin());
+ EXPECT_EQ(B.end(), B.begin());
+ EXPECT_EQ(BC.parent_end(), BC.parent_begin());
}
TEST(LazyCallGraphTest, IntraSCCEdgeRemoval) {
@@ -369,27 +369,27 @@ TEST(LazyCallGraphTest, IntraSCCEdgeRemoval) {
LazyCallGraph::SCC *SCC = *SCCI++;
EXPECT_EQ(CG1.postorder_scc_end(), SCCI);
- LazyCallGraph::Node *A = CG1.lookup(lookupFunction(*M1, "a"));
- LazyCallGraph::Node *B = CG1.lookup(lookupFunction(*M1, "b"));
- LazyCallGraph::Node *C = CG1.lookup(lookupFunction(*M1, "c"));
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(A->getFunction()));
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(B->getFunction()));
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(C->getFunction()));
+ LazyCallGraph::Node &A = *CG1.lookup(lookupFunction(*M1, "a"));
+ LazyCallGraph::Node &B = *CG1.lookup(lookupFunction(*M1, "b"));
+ LazyCallGraph::Node &C = *CG1.lookup(lookupFunction(*M1, "c"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(A));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(B));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(C));
// Remove the edge from b -> a, which should leave the 3 functions still in
// a single connected component because of a -> b -> c -> a.
- CG1.removeEdge(*B, A->getFunction());
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(A->getFunction()));
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(B->getFunction()));
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(C->getFunction()));
+ CG1.removeEdge(B, A.getFunction());
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(A));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(B));
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(C));
// Remove the edge from c -> a, which should leave 'a' in the original SCC
// and form a new SCC for 'b' and 'c'.
- CG1.removeEdge(*C, A->getFunction());
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(A->getFunction()));
+ CG1.removeEdge(C, A.getFunction());
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC, CG1.lookupSCC(A));
EXPECT_EQ(1, std::distance(SCC->begin(), SCC->end()));
- LazyCallGraph::SCC *SCC2 = CG1.lookupSCC(B->getFunction());
- EXPECT_EQ(SCC2, CG1.lookupSCC(C->getFunction()));
+ LazyCallGraph::SCC *SCC2 = CG1.lookupSCC(B);
+ EXPECT_EQ(SCC2, CG1.lookupSCC(C));
}
}