summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--include/llvm/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.h35
-rw-r--r--include/llvm/Analysis/Passes.h7
-rw-r--r--include/llvm/Analysis/ValueNumbering.h75
-rw-r--r--include/llvm/LinkAllPasses.h4
-rw-r--r--include/llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h9
-rw-r--r--lib/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.cpp530
-rw-r--r--lib/Analysis/ValueNumbering.cpp286
-rw-r--r--lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp205
-rw-r--r--tools/llvm-ld/Optimize.cpp1
-rw-r--r--tools/lto/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp1
10 files changed, 0 insertions, 1153 deletions
diff --git a/include/llvm/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.h b/include/llvm/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 340a193e0a..0000000000
--- a/include/llvm/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-//===- llvm/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.h - Value # Load Insts --*- C++ -*-===//
-//
-// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
-//
-// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
-// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
-// This file defines a value numbering pass that value #'s load instructions.
-// To do this, it finds lexically identical load instructions, and uses alias
-// analysis to determine which loads are guaranteed to produce the same value.
-//
-// This pass builds off of another value numbering pass to implement value
-// numbering for non-load instructions. It uses Alias Analysis so that it can
-// disambiguate the load instructions. The more powerful these base analyses
-// are, the more powerful the resultant analysis will be.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-#ifndef LLVM_ANALYSIS_LOAD_VALUE_NUMBERING_H
-#define LLVM_ANALYSIS_LOAD_VALUE_NUMBERING_H
-
-namespace llvm {
-
-class FunctionPass;
-
-/// createLoadValueNumberingPass - Create and return a new pass that implements
-/// the ValueNumbering interface.
-///
-FunctionPass *createLoadValueNumberingPass();
-
-} // End llvm namespace
-
-#endif
diff --git a/include/llvm/Analysis/Passes.h b/include/llvm/Analysis/Passes.h
index 7843aea2ae..7995fc8cdc 100644
--- a/include/llvm/Analysis/Passes.h
+++ b/include/llvm/Analysis/Passes.h
@@ -79,13 +79,6 @@ namespace llvm {
//===--------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
- // createBasicVNPass - This pass walks SSA def-use chains to trivially
- // identify lexically identical expressions.
- //
- ImmutablePass *createBasicVNPass();
-
- //===--------------------------------------------------------------------===//
- //
// createProfileLoaderPass - This pass loads information from a profile dump
// file.
//
diff --git a/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueNumbering.h b/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueNumbering.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 72452acda1..0000000000
--- a/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueNumbering.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
-//===- llvm/Analysis/ValueNumbering.h - Value #'ing Interface ---*- C++ -*-===//
-//
-// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
-//
-// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
-// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
-// This file defines the abstract ValueNumbering interface, which is used as the
-// common interface used by all clients of value numbering information, and
-// implemented by all value numbering implementations.
-//
-// Implementations of this interface must implement the various virtual methods,
-// which automatically provides functionality for the entire suite of client
-// APIs.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-#ifndef LLVM_ANALYSIS_VALUE_NUMBERING_H
-#define LLVM_ANALYSIS_VALUE_NUMBERING_H
-
-#include <vector>
-#include "llvm/Pass.h"
-#include "llvm/System/IncludeFile.h"
-
-namespace llvm {
-
-class Value;
-class Instruction;
-
-struct ValueNumbering {
- static char ID; // Class identification, replacement for typeinfo
- virtual ~ValueNumbering(); // We want to be subclassed
-
- /// getEqualNumberNodes - Return nodes with the same value number as the
- /// specified Value. This fills in the argument vector with any equal values.
- ///
- virtual void getEqualNumberNodes(Value *V1,
- std::vector<Value*> &RetVals) const = 0;
-
- ///===-------------------------------------------------------------------===//
- /// Interfaces to update value numbering analysis information as the client
- /// changes the program.
- ///
-
- /// deleteValue - This method should be called whenever an LLVM Value is
- /// deleted from the program, for example when an instruction is found to be
- /// redundant and is eliminated.
- ///
- virtual void deleteValue(Value *V) {}
-
- /// copyValue - This method should be used whenever a preexisting value in the
- /// program is copied or cloned, introducing a new value. Note that analysis
- /// implementations should tolerate clients that use this method to introduce
- /// the same value multiple times: if the analysis already knows about a
- /// value, it should ignore the request.
- ///
- virtual void copyValue(Value *From, Value *To) {}
-
- /// replaceWithNewValue - This method is the obvious combination of the two
- /// above, and it provided as a helper to simplify client code.
- ///
- void replaceWithNewValue(Value *Old, Value *New) {
- copyValue(Old, New);
- deleteValue(Old);
- }
-};
-
-} // End llvm namespace
-
-// Force any file including this header to get the implementation as well
-FORCE_DEFINING_FILE_TO_BE_LINKED(BasicValueNumbering)
-
-#endif
diff --git a/include/llvm/LinkAllPasses.h b/include/llvm/LinkAllPasses.h
index 76a4a2f58d..d53e7bea50 100644
--- a/include/llvm/LinkAllPasses.h
+++ b/include/llvm/LinkAllPasses.h
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/FindUsedTypes.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/IntervalPartition.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopVR.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/Passes.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h"
@@ -50,7 +49,6 @@ namespace {
(void) llvm::createStructRetPromotionPass();
(void) llvm::createBasicAliasAnalysisPass();
(void) llvm::createLibCallAliasAnalysisPass(0);
- (void) llvm::createBasicVNPass();
(void) llvm::createBlockPlacementPass();
(void) llvm::createBlockProfilerPass();
(void) llvm::createBreakCriticalEdgesPass();
@@ -65,7 +63,6 @@ namespace {
(void) llvm::createEdgeProfilerPass();
(void) llvm::createFunctionInliningPass();
(void) llvm::createFunctionProfilerPass();
- (void) llvm::createGCSEPass();
(void) llvm::createGlobalDCEPass();
(void) llvm::createGlobalOptimizerPass();
(void) llvm::createGlobalsModRefPass();
@@ -77,7 +74,6 @@ namespace {
(void) llvm::createInternalizePass(false);
(void) llvm::createLCSSAPass();
(void) llvm::createLICMPass();
- (void) llvm::createLoadValueNumberingPass();
(void) llvm::createLoopExtractorPass();
(void) llvm::createLoopSimplifyPass();
(void) llvm::createLoopStrengthReducePass();
diff --git a/include/llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h b/include/llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h
index d62cdc7a86..b4c3e7caf5 100644
--- a/include/llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h
+++ b/include/llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h
@@ -78,15 +78,6 @@ FunctionPass *createScalarReplAggregatesPass(signed Threshold = -1);
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
-// GCSE - This pass is designed to be a very quick global transformation that
-// eliminates global common subexpressions from a function. It does this by
-// examining the SSA value graph of the function, instead of doing slow
-// bit-vector computations.
-//
-FunctionPass *createGCSEPass();
-
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
// InductionVariableSimplify - Transform induction variables in a program to all
// use a single canonical induction variable per loop.
//
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.cpp b/lib/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.cpp
deleted file mode 100644
index f99ebb4a83..0000000000
--- a/lib/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.cpp
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,530 +0,0 @@
-//===- LoadValueNumbering.cpp - Load Value #'ing Implementation -*- C++ -*-===//
-//
-// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
-//
-// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
-// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
-// This file implements a value numbering pass that value numbers load and call
-// instructions. To do this, it finds lexically identical load instructions,
-// and uses alias analysis to determine which loads are guaranteed to produce
-// the same value. To value number call instructions, it looks for calls to
-// functions that do not write to memory which do not have intervening
-// instructions that clobber the memory that is read from.
-//
-// This pass builds off of another value numbering pass to implement value
-// numbering for non-load and non-call instructions. It uses Alias Analysis so
-// that it can disambiguate the load instructions. The more powerful these base
-// analyses are, the more powerful the resultant value numbering will be.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-#include "llvm/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.h"
-#include "llvm/Constants.h"
-#include "llvm/Function.h"
-#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
-#include "llvm/Pass.h"
-#include "llvm/Type.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueNumbering.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
-#include "llvm/Target/TargetData.h"
-#include <set>
-#include <algorithm>
-using namespace llvm;
-
-namespace {
- // FIXME: This should not be a FunctionPass.
- struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN LoadVN : public FunctionPass, public ValueNumbering {
- static char ID; // Class identification, replacement for typeinfo
- LoadVN() : FunctionPass((intptr_t)&ID) {}
-
- /// Pass Implementation stuff. This doesn't do any analysis.
- ///
- bool runOnFunction(Function &) { return false; }
-
- /// getAnalysisUsage - Does not modify anything. It uses Value Numbering
- /// and Alias Analysis.
- ///
- virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const;
-
- /// getEqualNumberNodes - Return nodes with the same value number as the
- /// specified Value. This fills in the argument vector with any equal
- /// values.
- ///
- virtual void getEqualNumberNodes(Value *V1,
- std::vector<Value*> &RetVals) const;
-
- /// deleteValue - This method should be called whenever an LLVM Value is
- /// deleted from the program, for example when an instruction is found to be
- /// redundant and is eliminated.
- ///
- virtual void deleteValue(Value *V) {
- getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>().deleteValue(V);
- }
-
- /// copyValue - This method should be used whenever a preexisting value in
- /// the program is copied or cloned, introducing a new value. Note that
- /// analysis implementations should tolerate clients that use this method to
- /// introduce the same value multiple times: if the analysis already knows
- /// about a value, it should ignore the request.
- ///
- virtual void copyValue(Value *From, Value *To) {
- getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>().copyValue(From, To);
- }
-
- /// getCallEqualNumberNodes - Given a call instruction, find other calls
- /// that have the same value number.
- void getCallEqualNumberNodes(CallInst *CI,
- std::vector<Value*> &RetVals) const;
- };
-}
-
-char LoadVN::ID = 0;
-// Register this pass...
-static RegisterPass<LoadVN>
-X("load-vn", "Load Value Numbering", false, true);
-
-// Declare that we implement the ValueNumbering interface
-static RegisterAnalysisGroup<ValueNumbering> Y(X);
-
-FunctionPass *llvm::createLoadValueNumberingPass() { return new LoadVN(); }
-
-
-/// getAnalysisUsage - Does not modify anything. It uses Value Numbering and
-/// Alias Analysis.
-///
-void LoadVN::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
- AU.setPreservesAll();
- AU.addRequiredTransitive<AliasAnalysis>();
- AU.addRequired<ValueNumbering>();
- AU.addRequiredTransitive<DominatorTree>();
- AU.addRequiredTransitive<TargetData>();
-}
-
-static bool isPathTransparentTo(BasicBlock *CurBlock, BasicBlock *Dom,
- Value *Ptr, unsigned Size, AliasAnalysis &AA,
- std::set<BasicBlock*> &Visited,
- std::map<BasicBlock*, bool> &TransparentBlocks){
- // If we have already checked out this path, or if we reached our destination,
- // stop searching, returning success.
- if (CurBlock == Dom || !Visited.insert(CurBlock).second)
- return true;
-
- // Check whether this block is known transparent or not.
- std::map<BasicBlock*, bool>::iterator TBI =
- TransparentBlocks.find(CurBlock);
-
- if (TBI == TransparentBlocks.end()) {
- // If this basic block can modify the memory location, then the path is not
- // transparent!
- if (AA.canBasicBlockModify(*CurBlock, Ptr, Size)) {
- TransparentBlocks.insert(TBI, std::make_pair(CurBlock, false));
- return false;
- }
- TransparentBlocks.insert(TBI, std::make_pair(CurBlock, true));
- } else if (!TBI->second)
- // This block is known non-transparent, so that path can't be either.
- return false;
-
- // The current block is known to be transparent. The entire path is
- // transparent if all of the predecessors paths to the parent is also
- // transparent to the memory location.
- for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(CurBlock), E = pred_end(CurBlock);
- PI != E; ++PI)
- if (!isPathTransparentTo(*PI, Dom, Ptr, Size, AA, Visited,
- TransparentBlocks))
- return false;
- return true;
-}
-
-/// getCallEqualNumberNodes - Given a call instruction, find other calls that
-/// have the same value number.
-void LoadVN::getCallEqualNumberNodes(CallInst *CI,
- std::vector<Value*> &RetVals) const {
- Function *CF = CI->getCalledFunction();
- if (CF == 0) return; // Indirect call.
- AliasAnalysis &AA = getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();
- AliasAnalysis::ModRefBehavior MRB = AA.getModRefBehavior(CI);
- if (MRB != AliasAnalysis::DoesNotAccessMemory &&
- MRB != AliasAnalysis::OnlyReadsMemory)
- return; // Nothing we can do for now.
-
- // Scan all of the arguments of the function, looking for one that is not
- // global. In particular, we would prefer to have an argument or instruction
- // operand to chase the def-use chains of.
- Value *Op = CF;
- for (User::op_iterator i = CI->op_begin() + 1, e = CI->op_end(); i != e; ++i)
- if (isa<Argument>(*i) ||
- isa<Instruction>(*i)) {
- Op = *i;
- break;
- }
-
- // Identify all lexically identical calls in this function.
- std::vector<CallInst*> IdenticalCalls;
-
- Function *CIFunc = CI->getParent()->getParent();
- for (Value::use_iterator UI = Op->use_begin(), E = Op->use_end(); UI != E;
- ++UI)
- if (CallInst *C = dyn_cast<CallInst>(*UI))
- if (C->getNumOperands() == CI->getNumOperands() &&
- C->getOperand(0) == CI->getOperand(0) &&
- C->getParent()->getParent() == CIFunc && C != CI) {
- bool AllOperandsEqual = true;
- for (User::op_iterator i = CI->op_begin() + 1, j = C->op_begin() + 1,
- e = CI->op_end(); i != e; ++i, ++j)
- if (*j != *i) {
- AllOperandsEqual = false;
- break;
- }
-
- if (AllOperandsEqual)
- IdenticalCalls.push_back(C);
- }
-
- if (IdenticalCalls.empty()) return;
-
- // Eliminate duplicates, which could occur if we chose a value that is passed
- // into a call site multiple times.
- std::sort(IdenticalCalls.begin(), IdenticalCalls.end());
- IdenticalCalls.erase(std::unique(IdenticalCalls.begin(),IdenticalCalls.end()),
- IdenticalCalls.end());
-
- // If the call reads memory, we must make sure that there are no stores
- // between the calls in question.
- //
- // FIXME: This should use mod/ref information. What we really care about it
- // whether an intervening instruction could modify memory that is read, not
- // ANY memory.
- //
- if (MRB == AliasAnalysis::OnlyReadsMemory) {
- DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
- BasicBlock *CIBB = CI->getParent();
- for (unsigned i = 0; i != IdenticalCalls.size(); ++i) {
- CallInst *C = IdenticalCalls[i];
- bool CantEqual = false;
-
- if (DT.dominates(CIBB, C->getParent())) {
- // FIXME: we currently only handle the case where both calls are in the
- // same basic block.
- if (CIBB != C->getParent()) {
- CantEqual = true;
- } else {
- Instruction *First = CI, *Second = C;
- if (!DT.dominates(CI, C))
- std::swap(First, Second);
-
- // Scan the instructions between the calls, checking for stores or
- // calls to dangerous functions.
- BasicBlock::iterator I = First;
- for (++First; I != BasicBlock::iterator(Second); ++I) {
- if (isa<StoreInst>(I)) {
- // FIXME: We could use mod/ref information to make this much
- // better!
- CantEqual = true;
- break;
- } else if (CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(I)) {
- if (!AA.onlyReadsMemory(CI)) {
- CantEqual = true;
- break;
- }
- } else if (I->mayWriteToMemory()) {
- CantEqual = true;
- break;
- }
- }
- }
-
- } else if (DT.dominates(C->getParent(), CIBB)) {
- // FIXME: We could implement this, but we don't for now.
- CantEqual = true;
- } else {
- // FIXME: if one doesn't dominate the other, we can't tell yet.
- CantEqual = true;
- }
-
-
- if (CantEqual) {
- // This call does not produce the same value as the one in the query.
- std::swap(IdenticalCalls[i--], IdenticalCalls.back());
- IdenticalCalls.pop_back();
- }
- }
- }
-
- // Any calls that are identical and not destroyed will produce equal values!
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = IdenticalCalls.size(); i != e; ++i)
- RetVals.push_back(IdenticalCalls[i]);
-}
-
-// getEqualNumberNodes - Return nodes with the same value number as the
-// specified Value. This fills in the argument vector with any equal values.
-//
-void LoadVN::getEqualNumberNodes(Value *V,
- std::vector<Value*> &RetVals) const {
- // If the alias analysis has any must alias information to share with us, we
- // can definitely use it.
- if (isa<PointerType>(V->getType()))
- getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>().getMustAliases(V, RetVals);
-
- if (!isa<LoadInst>(V)) {
- if (CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(V))
- getCallEqualNumberNodes(CI, RetVals);
-
- // Not a load instruction? Just chain to the base value numbering
- // implementation to satisfy the request...
- assert(&getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>() != (ValueNumbering*)this &&
- "getAnalysis() returned this!");
-
- return getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>().getEqualNumberNodes(V, RetVals);
- }
-
- // Volatile loads cannot be replaced with the value of other loads.
- LoadInst *LI = cast<LoadInst>(V);
- if (LI->isVolatile())
- return getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>().getEqualNumberNodes(V, RetVals);
-
- Value *LoadPtr = LI->getOperand(0);
- BasicBlock *LoadBB = LI->getParent();
- Function *F = LoadBB->getParent();
-
- // Find out how many bytes of memory are loaded by the load instruction...
- unsigned LoadSize = getAnalysis<TargetData>().getTypeStoreSize(LI->getType());
- AliasAnalysis &AA = getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();
-
- // Figure out if the load is invalidated from the entry of the block it is in
- // until the actual instruction. This scans the block backwards from LI. If
- // we see any candidate load or store instructions, then we know that the
- // candidates have the same value # as LI.
- bool LoadInvalidatedInBBBefore = false;
- for (BasicBlock::iterator I = LI; I != LoadBB->begin(); ) {
- --I;
- if (I == LoadPtr) {
- // If we run into an allocation of the value being loaded, then the
- // contents are not initialized.
- if (isa<AllocationInst>(I))
- RetVals.push_back(UndefValue::get(LI->getType()));
-
- // Otherwise, since this is the definition of what we are loading, this
- // loaded value cannot occur before this block.
- LoadInvalidatedInBBBefore = true;
- break;
- } else if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(I)) {
- // If this instruction is a candidate load before LI, we know there are no
- // invalidating instructions between it and LI, so they have the same
- // value number.
- if (LI->getOperand(0) == LoadPtr && !LI->isVolatile())
- RetVals.push_back(I);
- }
-
- if (AA.getModRefInfo(I, LoadPtr, LoadSize) & AliasAnalysis::Mod) {
- // If the invalidating instruction is a store, and its in our candidate
- // set, then we can do store-load forwarding: the load has the same value
- // # as the stored value.
- if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(I))
- if (SI->getOperand(1) == LoadPtr)
- RetVals.push_back(I->getOperand(0));
-
- LoadInvalidatedInBBBefore = true;
- break;
- }
- }
-
- // Figure out if the load is invalidated between the load and the exit of the
- // block it is defined in. While we are scanning the current basic block, if
- // we see any candidate loads, then we know they have the same value # as LI.
- //
- bool LoadInvalidatedInBBAfter = false;
- {
- BasicBlock::iterator I = LI;
- for (++I; I != LoadBB->end(); ++I) {
- // If this instruction is a load, then this instruction returns the same
- // value as LI.
- if (isa<LoadInst>(I) && cast<LoadInst>(I)->getOperand(0) == LoadPtr)
- RetVals.push_back(I);
-
- if (AA.getModRefInfo(I, LoadPtr, LoadSize) & AliasAnalysis::Mod) {
- LoadInvalidatedInBBAfter = true;
- break;
- }
- }
- }
-
- // If the pointer is clobbered on entry and on exit to the function, there is
- // no need to do any global analysis at all.
- if (LoadInvalidatedInBBBefore && LoadInvalidatedInBBAfter)
- return;
-
- // Now that we know the value is not neccesarily killed on entry or exit to
- // the BB, find out how many load and store instructions (to this location)
- // live in each BB in the function.
- //
- std::map<BasicBlock*, unsigned> CandidateLoads;
- std::set<BasicBlock*> CandidateStores;
-
- for (Value::use_iterator UI = LoadPtr->use_begin(), UE = LoadPtr->use_end();
- UI != UE; ++UI)
- if (LoadInst *Cand = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(*UI)) {// Is a load of source?
- if (Cand->getParent()->getParent() == F && // In the same function?
- // Not in LI's block?
- Cand->getParent() != LoadBB && !Cand->isVolatile())
- ++CandidateLoads[Cand->getParent()]; // Got one.
- } else if (StoreInst *Cand = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(*UI)) {
- if (Cand->getParent()->getParent() == F && !Cand->isVolatile() &&
- Cand->getOperand(1) == LoadPtr) // It's a store THROUGH the ptr.
- CandidateStores.insert(Cand->getParent());
- }
-
- // Get dominators.
- DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
-
- // TransparentBlocks - For each basic block the load/store is alive across,
- // figure out if the pointer is invalidated or not. If it is invalidated, the
- // boolean is set to false, if it's not it is set to true. If we don't know
- // yet, the entry is not in the map.
- std::map<BasicBlock*, bool> TransparentBlocks;
-
- // Loop over all of the basic blocks that also load the value. If the value
- // is live across the CFG from the source to destination blocks, and if the
- // value is not invalidated in either the source or destination blocks, add it
- // to the equivalence sets.
- for (std::map<BasicBlock*, unsigned>::iterator
- I = CandidateLoads.begin(), E = CandidateLoads.end(); I != E; ++I) {
- bool CantEqual = false;
-
- // Right now we only can handle cases where one load dominates the other.
- // FIXME: generalize this!
- BasicBlock *BB1 = I->first, *BB2 = LoadBB;
- if (DT.dominates(BB1, BB2)) {
- // The other load dominates LI. If the loaded value is killed entering
- // the LoadBB block, we know the load is not live.
- if (LoadInvalidatedInBBBefore)
- CantEqual = true;
- } else if (DT.dominates(BB2, BB1)) {
- std::swap(BB1, BB2); // Canonicalize
- // LI dominates the other load. If the loaded value is killed exiting
- // the LoadBB block, we know the load is not live.
- if (LoadInvalidatedInBBAfter)
- CantEqual = true;
- } else {
- // None of these loads can VN the same.
- CantEqual = true;
- }
-
- if (!CantEqual) {
- // Ok, at this point, we know that BB1 dominates BB2, and that there is
- // nothing in the LI block that kills the loaded value. Check to see if
- // the value is live across the CFG.
- std::set<BasicBlock*> Visited;
- for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB2), E = pred_end(BB2); PI!=E; ++PI)
- if (!isPathTransparentTo(*PI, BB1, LoadPtr, LoadSize, AA,
- Visited, TransparentBlocks)) {
- // None of these loads can VN the same.
- CantEqual = true;
- break;
- }
- }
-
- // If the loads can equal so far, scan the basic block that contains the
- // loads under consideration to see if they are invalidated in the block.
- // For any loads that are not invalidated, add them to the equivalence
- // set!
- if (!CantEqual) {
- unsigned NumLoads = I->second;
- if (BB1 == LoadBB) {
- // If LI dominates the block in question, check to see if any of the
- // loads in this block are invalidated before they are reached.
- for (BasicBlock::iterator BBI = I->first->begin(); ; ++BBI) {
- if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(BBI)) {
- if (LI->getOperand(0) == LoadPtr && !LI->isVolatile()) {
- // The load is in the set!
- RetVals.push_back(BBI);
- if (--NumLoads == 0) break; // Found last load to check.
- }
- } else if (AA.getModRefInfo(BBI, LoadPtr, LoadSize)
- & AliasAnalysis::Mod) {
- // If there is a modifying instruction, nothing below it will value
- // # the same.
- break;
- }
- }
- } else {
- // If the block dominates LI, make sure that the loads in the block are
- // not invalidated before the block ends.
- BasicBlock::iterator BBI = I->first->end();
- while (1) {
- --BBI;
- if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(BBI)) {
- if (LI->getOperand(0) == LoadPtr && !LI->isVolatile()) {
- // The load is the same as this load!
- RetVals.push_back(BBI);
- if (--NumLoads == 0) break; // Found all of the laods.
- }
- } else if (AA.getModRefInfo(BBI, LoadPtr, LoadSize)
- & AliasAnalysis::Mod) {
- // If there is a modifying instruction, nothing above it will value
- // # the same.
- break;
- }
- }
- }
- }
- }
-
- // Handle candidate stores. If the loaded location is clobbered on entrance
- // to the LoadBB, no store outside of the LoadBB can value number equal, so
- // quick exit.
- if (LoadInvalidatedInBBBefore)
- return;
-
- // Stores in the load-bb are handled above.
- CandidateStores.erase(LoadBB);
-
- for (std::set<BasicBlock*>::iterator I = CandidateStores.begin(),
- E = CandidateStores.end(); I != E; ++I)
- if (DT.dominates(*I, LoadBB)) {
- BasicBlock *StoreBB = *I;
-
- // Check to see if the path from the store to the load is transparent
- // w.r.t. the memory location.
- bool CantEqual = false;
- std::set<BasicBlock*> Visited;
- for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(LoadBB), E = pred_end(LoadBB);
- PI != E; ++PI)
- if (!isPathTransparentTo(*PI, StoreBB, LoadPtr, LoadSize, AA,
- Visited, TransparentBlocks)) {
- // None of these stores can VN the same.
- CantEqual = true;
- break;
- }
- Visited.clear();
- if (!CantEqual) {
- // Okay, the path from the store block to the load block is clear, and
- // we know that there are no invalidating instructions from the start
- // of the load block to the load itself. Now we just scan the store
- // block.
-
- BasicBlock::iterator BBI = StoreBB->end();
- while (1) {
- assert(BBI != StoreBB->begin() &&
- "There is a store in this block of the pointer, but the store"
- " doesn't mod the address being stored to?? Must be a bug in"
- " the alias analysis implementation!");
- --BBI;
- if (AA.getModRefInfo(BBI, LoadPtr, LoadSize) & AliasAnalysis::Mod) {
- // If the invalidating instruction is one of the candidates,
- // then it provides the value the load loads.
- if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(BBI))
- if (SI->getOperand(1) == LoadPtr)
- RetVals.push_back(SI->getOperand(0));
- break;
- }
- }
- }
- }
-}
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ValueNumbering.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ValueNumbering.cpp
deleted file mode 100644
index 55323eaa9e..0000000000
--- a/lib/Analysis/ValueNumbering.cpp
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,286 +0,0 @@
-//===- ValueNumbering.cpp - Value #'ing Implementation ----------*- C++ -*-===//
-//
-// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
-//
-// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
-// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
-// This file implements the non-abstract Value Numbering methods as well as a
-// default implementation for the analysis group.
-//
-// The ValueNumbering analysis pass is mostly deprecated. It is only used by the
-// Global Common Subexpression Elimination pass, which is deprecated by the
-// Global Value Numbering pass (which does its value numbering on its own).
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-#include "llvm/Analysis/Passes.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueNumbering.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/InstVisitor.h"
-#include "llvm/BasicBlock.h"
-#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
-#include "llvm/Pass.h"
-#include "llvm/Type.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
-using namespace llvm;
-
-char ValueNumbering::ID = 0;
-// Register the ValueNumbering interface, providing a nice name to refer to.
-static RegisterAnalysisGroup<ValueNumbering> V("Value Numbering");
-
-/// ValueNumbering destructor: DO NOT move this to the header file for
-/// ValueNumbering or else clients of the ValueNumbering class may not depend on
-/// the ValueNumbering.o file in the current .a file, causing alias analysis
-/// support to not be included in the tool correctly!
-///
-ValueNumbering::~ValueNumbering() {}
-
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// Basic ValueNumbering Pass Implementation
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
-// Because of the way .a files work, the implementation of the BasicVN class
-// MUST be in the ValueNumbering file itself, or else we run the risk of
-// ValueNumbering being used, but the default implementation not being linked
-// into the tool that uses it. As such, we register and implement the class
-// here.
-//
-
-namespace {
- /// BasicVN - This class is the default implementation of the ValueNumbering
- /// interface. It walks the SSA def-use chains to trivially identify
- /// lexically identical expressions. This does not require any ahead of time
- /// analysis, so it is a very fast default implementation.
- ///
- struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN BasicVN
- : public ImmutablePass, public ValueNumbering {
- static char ID; // Class identification, replacement for typeinfo
- BasicVN() : ImmutablePass((intptr_t)&ID) {}
-
- /// getEqualNumberNodes - Return nodes with the same value number as the
- /// specified Value. This fills in the argument vector with any equal
- /// values.
- ///
- /// This is where our implementation is.
- ///
- virtual void getEqualNumberNodes(Value *V1,
- std::vector<Value*> &RetVals) const;
- };
-}
-
-char BasicVN::ID = 0;
-// Register this pass...
-static RegisterPass<BasicVN>
-X("basicvn", "Basic Value Numbering (default GVN impl)", false, true);
-
-// Declare that we implement the ValueNumbering interface
-static RegisterAnalysisGroup<ValueNumbering, true> Y(X);
-
-namespace {
- /// BVNImpl - Implement BasicVN in terms of a visitor class that
- /// handles the different types of instructions as appropriate.
- ///
- struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN BVNImpl : public InstVisitor<BVNImpl> {
- std::vector<Value*> &RetVals;
- explicit BVNImpl(std::vector<Value*> &RV) : RetVals(RV) {}
-
- void visitCastInst(CastInst &I);
- void visitGetElementPtrInst(GetElementPtrInst &I);
- void visitCmpInst(CmpInst &I);
-
- void handleBinaryInst(Instruction &I);
- void visitBinaryOperator(Instruction &I) { handleBinaryInst(I); }
- void visitShiftInst(Instruction &I) { handleBinaryInst(I); }
- void visitExtractElementInst(Instruction &I) { handleBinaryInst(I); }
-
- void handleTernaryInst(Instruction &I);
- void visitSelectInst(Instruction &I) { handleTernaryInst(I); }
- void visitInsertElementInst(Instruction &I) { handleTernaryInst(I); }
- void visitShuffleVectorInst(Instruction &I) { handleTernaryInst(I); }
- void visitInstruction(Instruction &) {
- // Cannot value number calls or terminator instructions.
- }
- };
-}
-
-ImmutablePass *llvm::createBasicVNPass() { return new BasicVN(); }
-
-// getEqualNumberNodes - Return nodes with the same value number as the
-// specified Value. This fills in the argument vector with any equal values.
-//
-void BasicVN::getEqualNumberNodes(Value *V, std::vector<Value*> &RetVals) const{
- assert(V->getType() != Type::VoidTy &&
- "Can only value number non-void values!");
- // We can only handle the case where I is an instruction!
- if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V))
- BVNImpl(RetVals).visit(I);
-}
-
-void BVNImpl::visitCastInst(CastInst &CI) {
- Instruction &I = (Instruction&)CI;
- Value *Op = I.getOperand(0);
- Function *F = I.getParent()->getParent();
-
- for (Value::use_iterator UI = Op->use_begin(), UE = Op->use_end();
- UI != UE; ++UI)
- if (CastInst *Other = dyn_cast<CastInst>(*UI))
- // Check that the opcode is the same
- if (Other->getOpcode() == Instruction::CastOps(I.getOpcode()) &&
- // Check that the destination types are the same
- Other->getType() == I.getType() &&
- // Is it embedded in the same function? (This could be false if LHS
- // is a constant or global!)
- Other->getParent()->getParent() == F &&
- // Check to see if this new cast is not I.
- Other != &I) {
- // These instructions are identical. Add to list...
- RetVals.push_back(Other);
- }
-}
-
-void BVNImpl::visitCmpInst(CmpInst &CI1) {
- Value *LHS = CI1.getOperand(0);
- for (Value::use_iterator UI = LHS->use_begin(), UE = LHS->use_end();
- UI != UE; ++UI)
- if (CmpInst *CI2 = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(*UI))
- // Check to see if this compare instruction is not CI, but same opcode,
- // same predicate, and in the same function.
- if (CI2 != &CI1 && CI2->getOpcode() == CI1.getOpcode() &&
- CI2->getPredicate() == CI1.getPredicate() &&
- CI2->getParent()->getParent() == CI1.getParent()->getParent())
- // If the operands are the same
- if ((CI2->getOperand(0) == CI1.getOperand(0) &&
- CI2->getOperand(1) == CI1.getOperand(1)) ||
- // Or the compare is commutative and the operands are reversed
- (CI1.isCommutative() &&
- CI2->getOperand(0) == CI1.getOperand(1) &&
- CI2->getOperand(1) == CI1.getOperand(0)))
- // Then the instructiosn are identical, add to list.
- RetVals.push_back(CI2);
-}
-
-
-
-// isIdenticalBinaryInst - Return true if the two binary instructions are
-// identical.
-//
-static inline bool isIdenticalBinaryInst(const Instruction &I1,
- const Instruction *I2) {
- // Is it embedded in the same function? (This could be false if LHS
- // is a constant or global!)
- if (I1.getOpcode() != I2->getOpcode() ||
- I1.getParent()->getParent() != I2->getParent()->getParent())
- return false;
-
- // If they are CmpInst instructions, check their predicates
- if (CmpInst *CI1 = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(&const_cast<Instruction&>(I1)))
- if (CI1->getPredicate() != cast<CmpInst>(I2)->getPredicate())
- return false;
-
- // They are identical if both operands are the same!
- if (I1.getOperand(0) == I2->getOperand(0) &&
- I1.getOperand(1) == I2->getOperand(1))
- return true;
-
- // If the instruction is commutative, the instruction can match if the
- // operands are swapped!
- //
- if ((I1.getOperand(0) == I2->getOperand(1) &&
- I1.getOperand(1) == I2->getOperand(0)) &&
- I1.isCommutative())
- return true;
-
- return false;
-}
-
-// isIdenticalTernaryInst - Return true if the two ternary instructions are
-// identical.
-//
-static inline bool isIdenticalTernaryInst(const Instruction &I1,
- const Instruction *I2) {
- // Is it embedded in the same function? (This could be false if LHS
- // is a constant or global!)
- if (I1.getParent()->getParent() != I2->getParent()->getParent())
- return false;
-
- // They are identical if all operands are the same!
- return I1.getOperand(0) == I2->getOperand(0) &&
- I1.getOperand(1) == I2->getOperand(1) &&
- I1.getOperand(2) == I2->getOperand(2);
-}
-
-
-
-void BVNImpl::handleBinaryInst(Instruction &I) {
- Value *LHS = I.getOperand(0);
-
- for (Value::use_iterator UI = LHS->use_begin(), UE = LHS->use_end();
- UI != UE; ++UI)
- if (Instruction *Other = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*UI))
- // Check to see if this new binary operator is not I, but same operand...
- if (Other != &I && isIdenticalBinaryInst(I, Other)) {
- // These instructions are identical. Handle the situation.
- RetVals.push_back(Other);
- }
-}
-
-// IdenticalComplexInst - Return true if the two instructions are the same, by
-// using a brute force comparison. This is useful for instructions with an
-// arbitrary number of arguments.
-//
-static inline bool IdenticalComplexInst(const Instruction *I1,
- const Instruction *I2) {
- assert(I1->getOpcode() == I2->getOpcode());
- // Equal if they are in the same function...
- return I1->getParent()->getParent() == I2->getParent()->getParent() &&
- // And return the same type...
- I1->getType() == I2->getType() &&
- // And have the same number of operands...
- I1->getNumOperands() == I2->getNumOperands() &&
- // And all of the operands are equal.
- std::equal(I1->op_begin(), I1->op_end(), I2->op_begin());
-}
-
-void BVNImpl::visitGetElementPtrInst(GetElementPtrInst &I) {
- Value *Op = I.getOperand(0);
-
- // Try to pick a local operand if possible instead of a constant or a global
- // that might have a lot of uses.
- for (User::op_iterator i = I.op_begin() + 1, e = I.op_end(); i != e; ++i)
- if (isa<Instruction>(*i) || isa<Argument>(*i)) {
- Op = *i;
- break;
- }
-
- for (Value::use_iterator UI = Op->use_begin(), UE = Op->use_end();
- UI != UE; ++UI)
- if (GetElementPtrInst *Other = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(*UI))
- // Check to see if this new getelementptr is not I, but same operand...
- if (Other != &I && IdenticalComplexInst(&I, Other)) {
- // These instructions are identical. Handle the situation.
- RetVals.push_back(Other);
- }
-}
-
-void BVNImpl::handleTernaryInst(Instruction &I) {
- Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0);
- Instruction *OtherInst;
-
- for (Value::use_iterator UI = Op0->use_begin(), UE = Op0->use_end();
- UI != UE; ++UI)
- if ((OtherInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*UI)) &&
- OtherInst->getOpcode() == I.getOpcode()) {
- // Check to see if this new select is not I, but has the same operands.
- if (OtherInst != &I && isIdenticalTernaryInst(I, OtherInst)) {
- // These instructions are identical. Handle the situation.
- RetVals.push_back(OtherInst);
- }
-
- }
-}
-
-
-// Ensure that users of ValueNumbering.h will link with this file
-DEFINING_FILE_FOR(BasicValueNumbering)
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp
deleted file mode 100644
index 9d3f1a8750..0000000000
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,205 +0,0 @@
-//===-- GCSE.cpp - SSA-based Global Common Subexpression Elimination ------===//
-//
-// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
-//
-// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
-// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
-// This pass is designed to be a very quick global transformation that
-// eliminates global common subexpressions from a function. It does this by
-// using an existing value numbering analysis pass to identify the common
-// subexpressions, eliminating them when possible.
-//
-// This pass is deprecated by the Global Value Numbering pass (which does a
-// better job with its own value numbering).
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-#define DEBUG_TYPE "gcse"
-#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
-#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
-#include "llvm/Function.h"
-#include "llvm/Type.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/ConstantFolding.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueNumbering.h"
-#include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h"
-#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
-#include <algorithm>
-using namespace llvm;
-
-STATISTIC(NumInstRemoved, "Number of instructions removed");
-STATISTIC(NumLoadRemoved, "Number of loads removed");
-STATISTIC(NumCallRemoved, "Number of calls removed");
-STATISTIC(NumNonInsts , "Number of instructions removed due "
- "to non-instruction values");
-STATISTIC(NumArgsRepl , "Number of function arguments replaced "
- "with constant values");
-namespace {
- struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN GCSE : public FunctionPass {
- static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid
- GCSE() : FunctionPass((intptr_t)&ID) {}
-
- virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F);
-
- private:
- void ReplaceInstructionWith(Instruction *I, Value *V);
-
- // This transformation requires dominator and immediate dominator info
- virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
- AU.setPreservesCFG();
- AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
- AU.addRequired<ValueNumbering>();
- }
- };
-}
-
-char GCSE::ID = 0;
-static RegisterPass<GCSE>
-X("gcse", "Global Common Subexpression Elimination");
-
-// createGCSEPass - The public interface to this file...
-FunctionPass *llvm::createGCSEPass() { return new GCSE(); }
-
-// GCSE::runOnFunction - This is the main transformation entry point for a
-// function.
-//
-bool GCSE::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
- bool Changed = false;
-
- // Get pointers to the analysis results that we will be using...
- DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
- ValueNumbering &VN = getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>();
-
- std::vector<Value*> EqualValues;
-
- // Check for value numbers of arguments. If the value numbering
- // implementation can prove that an incoming argument is a constant or global
- // value address, substitute it, making the argument dead.
- for (Function::arg_iterator AI = F.arg_begin(), E = F.arg_end(); AI != E;++AI)
- if (!AI->use_empty()) {
- VN.getEqualNumberNodes(AI, EqualValues);
- if (!EqualValues.empty()) {
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = EqualValues.size(); i != e; ++i)
- if (isa<Constant>(EqualValues[i])) {
- AI->replaceAllUsesWith(EqualValues[i]);
- ++NumArgsRepl;
- Changed = true;
- break;
- }
- EqualValues.clear();
- }
- }
-
- // Traverse the CFG of the function in dominator order, so that we see each
- // instruction after we see its operands.
- for (df_iterator<DomTreeNode*> DI = df_begin(DT.getRootNode()),
- E = df_end(DT.getRootNode()); DI != E; ++DI) {
- BasicBlock *BB = DI->getBlock();
-
- // Remember which instructions we've seen in this basic block as we scan.
- std::set<Instruction*> BlockInsts;
-
- for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); I != E; ) {
- Instruction *Inst = I++;
-
- if (Constant *C = ConstantFoldInstruction(Inst)) {
- ReplaceInstructionWith(Inst, C);
- } else if (Inst->getType() != Type::VoidTy) {
- // If this instruction computes a value, try to fold together common
- // instructions that compute it.
- //
- VN.getEqualNumberNodes(Inst, EqualValues);
-
- // If this instruction computes a value that is already computed
- // elsewhere, try to recycle the old value.
- if (!EqualValues.empty()) {
- if (Inst == &*BB->begin())
- I = BB->end();
- else {
- I = Inst; --I;
- }
-
- // First check to see if we were able to value number this instruction
- // to a non-instruction value. If so, prefer that value over other
- // instructions which may compute the same thing.
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = EqualValues.size(); i != e; ++i)
- if (!isa<Instruction>(EqualValues[i])) {
- ++NumNonInsts; // Keep track of # of insts repl with values
-
- // Change all users of Inst to use the replacement and remove it
- // from the program.
- ReplaceInstructionWith(Inst, EqualValues[i]);
- Inst = 0;
- EqualValues.clear(); // don't enter the next loop
- break;
- }
-
- // If there were no non-instruction values that this instruction
- // produces, find a dominating instruction that produces the same
- // value. If we find one, use it's value instead of ours.
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = EqualValues.size(); i != e; ++i) {
- Instruction *OtherI = cast<Instruction>(EqualValues[i]);
- bool Dominates = false;
- if (OtherI->getParent() == BB)
- Dominates = BlockInsts.count(OtherI);
- else
- Dominates = DT.dominates(OtherI->getParent(), BB);
-
- if (Dominates) {
- // Okay, we found an instruction with the same value as this one
- // and that dominates this one. Replace this instruction with the
- // specified one.
- ReplaceInstructionWith(Inst, OtherI);
- Inst = 0;
- break;
- }
- }
-
- EqualValues.clear();
-
- if (Inst) {
- I = Inst; ++I; // Deleted no instructions
- } else if (I == BB->end()) { // Deleted first instruction
- I = BB->begin();
- } else { // Deleted inst in middle of block.
- ++I;
- }
- }
-
- if (Inst)
- BlockInsts.insert(Inst);
- }
- }
- }
-
- // When the worklist is empty, return whether or not we changed anything...
- return Changed;
-}
-
-
-void GCSE::ReplaceInstructionWith(Instruction *I, Value *V) {
- if (isa<LoadInst>(I))
- ++NumLoadRemoved; // Keep track of loads eliminated
- if (isa<CallInst>(I))
- ++NumCallRemoved; // Keep track of calls eliminated
- ++NumInstRemoved; // Keep track of number of insts eliminated
-
- // Update value numbering
- getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>().deleteValue(I);
-
- I->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
-
- if (InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(I)) {
- // Removing an invoke instruction requires adding a branch to the normal
- // destination and removing PHI node entries in the exception destination.
- BranchInst::Create(II->getNormalDest(), II);
- II->getUnwindDest()->removePredecessor(II->getParent());
- }
-
- // Erase the instruction from the program.
- I->eraseFromParent();
-}
diff --git a/tools/llvm-ld/Optimize.cpp b/tools/llvm-ld/Optimize.cpp
index 0cbd29ccb3..af95939776 100644
--- a/tools/llvm-ld/Optimize.cpp
+++ b/tools/llvm-ld/Optimize.cpp
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
#include "llvm/Module.h"
#include "llvm/PassManager.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/Passes.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/Verifier.h"
diff --git a/tools/lto/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp b/tools/lto/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp
index e60dc171bb..ad3964d3f7 100644
--- a/tools/lto/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp
+++ b/tools/lto/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
#include "llvm/Analysis/Passes.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/Verifier.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/FileWriters.h"
#include "llvm/Target/SubtargetFeature.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetOptions.h"