summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorQuentin Colombet <qcolombet@apple.com>2013-12-12 00:15:47 +0000
committerQuentin Colombet <qcolombet@apple.com>2013-12-12 00:15:47 +0000
commitb0f8afd43c54b9b5cb39eb1740eb1fedc4e6471c (patch)
tree0d26ede7f60c7b13cdf63b2080c93f2c92aa6f4a
parent76eb77dd52c4ec215e79e25992f04e3095afe5df (diff)
downloadllvm-b0f8afd43c54b9b5cb39eb1740eb1fedc4e6471c.tar.gz
llvm-b0f8afd43c54b9b5cb39eb1740eb1fedc4e6471c.tar.bz2
llvm-b0f8afd43c54b9b5cb39eb1740eb1fedc4e6471c.tar.xz
Fix an over-constrained assertion in MachineFunction::addLiveIn.
The assertion was checking that the virtual register VReg used to represent the physical register PReg uses the same register class as the one passed to MachineFunction::addLiveIn. This is over-constraining because it is sufficient to check that the register class of VReg (VRegRC) is a subclass of the register class of PReg (PRegRC) and that VRegRC contains PReg. Indeed, if VReg gets constrained because of some operation constraints between two calls of MachineFunction::addLiveIn, the original assertion cannot match. This fixes <rdar://problem/15633429>. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@197097 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp11
-rw-r--r--test/CodeGen/AArch64/assertion-rc-mismatch.ll24
2 files changed, 34 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp
index 0703df09a6..96a5ccb969 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp
@@ -425,7 +425,16 @@ unsigned MachineFunction::addLiveIn(unsigned PReg,
MachineRegisterInfo &MRI = getRegInfo();
unsigned VReg = MRI.getLiveInVirtReg(PReg);
if (VReg) {
- assert(MRI.getRegClass(VReg) == RC && "Register class mismatch!");
+ const TargetRegisterClass *VRegRC = MRI.getRegClass(VReg);
+ (void)VRegRC;
+ // A physical register can be added several times.
+ // Between two calls, the register class of the related virtual register
+ // may have been constrained to match some operation constraints.
+ // In that case, check that the current register class includes the
+ // physical register and is a sub class of the specified RC.
+ assert((VRegRC == RC || (VRegRC->contains(PReg) &&
+ RC->hasSubClassEq(VRegRC))) &&
+ "Register class mismatch!");
return VReg;
}
VReg = MRI.createVirtualRegister(RC);
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/AArch64/assertion-rc-mismatch.ll b/test/CodeGen/AArch64/assertion-rc-mismatch.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..02b0c0e786
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/CodeGen/AArch64/assertion-rc-mismatch.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=aarch64-none-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s
+; Test case related to <rdar://problem/15633429>.
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: small
+define i64 @small(i64 %encodedBase) {
+cmp:
+ %lnot.i.i = icmp eq i64 %encodedBase, 0
+ br i1 %lnot.i.i, label %if, label %else
+if:
+ %tmp1 = call i8* @llvm.returnaddress(i32 0)
+ br label %end
+else:
+ %tmp3 = call i8* @llvm.returnaddress(i32 0)
+ %ptr = getelementptr inbounds i8* %tmp3, i64 -16
+ %ld = load i8* %ptr, align 4
+ %tmp2 = inttoptr i8 %ld to i8*
+ br label %end
+end:
+ %tmp = phi i8* [ %tmp1, %if ], [ %tmp2, %else ]
+ %coerce.val.pi56 = ptrtoint i8* %tmp to i64
+ ret i64 %coerce.val.pi56
+}
+
+declare i8* @llvm.returnaddress(i32)