summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke.ll
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMark Seaborn <mseaborn@chromium.org>2013-12-08 00:50:58 +0000
committerMark Seaborn <mseaborn@chromium.org>2013-12-08 00:50:58 +0000
commit615f9b7162ac6444c9e45042477634b73ba8850a (patch)
tree3fc110c71e119f6478b0d4dd5d253878a05660ba /test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke.ll
parent1de81334024df0f59ef2e5f1af2701ca7c04068c (diff)
downloadllvm-615f9b7162ac6444c9e45042477634b73ba8850a.tar.gz
llvm-615f9b7162ac6444c9e45042477634b73ba8850a.tar.bz2
llvm-615f9b7162ac6444c9e45042477634b73ba8850a.tar.xz
Fix inlining to not produce duplicate landingpad clauses
Before this change, inlining one "invoke" into an outer "invoke" call site can lead to the outer landingpad's catch/filter clauses being copied multiple times into the resulting landingpad. This happens: * when the inlined function contains multiple "resume" instructions, because forwardResume() copies the clauses but is called multiple times; * when the inlined function contains a "resume" and a "call", because HandleCallsInBlockInlinedThroughInvoke() copies the clauses but is redundant with forwardResume(). Fix this by deduplicating the code. This problem doesn't lead to any incorrect execution; it's only untidy. This change will make fixing PR17872 a little easier. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196710 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke.ll')
-rw-r--r--test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke.ll5
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke.ll b/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke.ll
index c3941388f9..c53bb5aa17 100644
--- a/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke.ll
+++ b/test/Transforms/Inline/inline_invoke.ll
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ eh.resume:
; CHECK: landingpad { i8*, i32 } personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
; CHECK-NEXT: cleanup
; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
-; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
; CHECK-NEXT: invoke void @_ZN1AD1Ev(%struct.A* [[A]])
; CHECK-NEXT: to label %[[LBL:[^\s]+]] unwind
; CHECK: [[LBL]]:
@@ -167,7 +166,6 @@ eh.resume:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[LPADVAL1:%.*]] = landingpad { i8*, i32 } personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
; CHECK-NEXT: cleanup
; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
-; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
; CHECK-NEXT: invoke void @_ZN1AD1Ev(%struct.A* [[A1]])
; CHECK-NEXT: to label %[[RESUME1:[^\s]+]] unwind
; CHECK: [[RESUME1]]:
@@ -187,7 +185,6 @@ eh.resume:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[LPADVAL2:%.*]] = landingpad { i8*, i32 } personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
; CHECK-NEXT: cleanup
; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
-; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
; CHECK-NEXT: invoke void @_ZN1AD1Ev(%struct.A* [[A2]])
; CHECK-NEXT: to label %[[RESUME2:[^\s]+]] unwind
; CHECK: [[RESUME2]]:
@@ -275,7 +272,6 @@ lpad.cont:
; CHECK: landingpad { i8*, i32 } personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
; CHECK-NEXT: cleanup
; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
-; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
; CHECK-NEXT: invoke void @_ZN1AD1Ev(
; CHECK-NEXT: to label %[[L:[^\s]+]] unwind
; CHECK: [[L]]:
@@ -322,7 +318,6 @@ terminate:
; CHECK: landingpad { i8*, i32 } personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
; CHECK-NEXT: cleanup
; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
-; CHECK-NEXT: catch i8* bitcast (i8** @_ZTIi to i8*)
; CHECK-NEXT: invoke void @_ZN1AD1Ev(
; CHECK-NEXT: to label %[[L:[^\s]+]] unwind
; CHECK: [[L]]: